Burn wounds
Burns are injuries of our skin caused by heat, chemicals, electricity or radiation. They present significant dangers and complications, ranging from immediate physical damage to long-term health issues.
Burn degrees
The depth is categorized in four burn degrees: 1, 2a, 2b, 3 and 4.
Gif 1: Different burn degrees. [1]
Burn degree | Depth | Symptoms | Healing |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Superficial, only Epidermis damaged | - Redness (erythema) - Mild swelling - Pain (usually mild to moderate) - Dry skin without blistering |
3-6 days without scar |
2a | Involves epidermis and upper dermis | - Bright red or pink color - Moist appearance due to blisters and weeping - Pain is usually severe due to intact nerve endings |
1-3 weeks with minimal scarring, often without significant complications |
2b | Lower dermis up to the subcutaneous tissue | - Red color - Skin may appear waxy - Pain is usually less severe than in 2a burns because of nerve damage |
3-6 weeks or longer, high risk of scarring, may require skin grafting |
3 | Involves even muscle tissue | - White, waxy, or leathery appearance - Dry and stiff - Little to no pain due to nerve damage |
Requires skin grafting for proper healing, significant scarring |
4 | Involves all layers of skin and extends into muscle, tendon, and bone | - Charred or blackened skin - No sensation in the area due to extensive nerve damage |
Extensive surgical intervention, including amputation, results in significant functional impairment and scarring |
The exact depth of a burn is often difficult to assess. There is a thin line between a 2a and a 2b
degree burn which is a critical point whether a patient needs surgery and skin grafting or not. An
unnecessary operation would increase the risk of infection while not performing an operation when it
is needed could put the patients at risk as well [2].
Socioeconomic factors
A study comparing global burn injury data ranging from 1990 to 2019 discovered that most of the
newest reported cases tend to occur among 10- to 19-year-olds – while most of the deaths related to
burns occur mainly among very young children from the age of one to four [10]. However, the
likelihood of being burned is not equally distributed around the world: According to the WHO,
especially people in low- and middle-income countries are at risk to suffer fatal burn injuries,
with most of the deaths occurring in Africa and South-East-Asia [11].
In high-income countries fatalities due to burns have been steadily decreasing with a death rate in
children that is seven times lower than in low- and middle-income countries [11]. Despite a general
tendency for higher injury rates in men, women and children in these countries are victims of burns
more often. For women and girls this is mainly due to accidents while cooking on open flames and
unsafe stoves - for children in general it is mainly, because they are unattended at the time.
Another important cause mentioned by the WHO is domestic violence, for which there exists however no
reliable data.
Both the WHO and the study agree that worldwide the burn risk correlates with the socioeconomic
status. According to the WHO, contributing factors are (among others) jobs that expose people to
open flames, a lack in safety measures, and poverty. At the same time, costs for medical assistance
tend to be high. Added to this are indirect costs that arise due to disabilities, trauma and being
unfit for work as a consequence of the burn injury [11]. So, the people most at risk are also the
ones, that are least likely to be able to pay for medical treatment.
Current treatment methods
Standard treatments are quite expensive and include wound cleaning, debridement to remove dead tissue,
and the application of topical antibiotics and dressings. The risk of infection remains high,
necessitating frequent monitoring and dressing changes, which can be painful and distressing for the
patient. The healing process can be slow, and there is a significant risk of scarring, which may require
further surgical intervention. Some patients may even experience allergic reactions or sensitivities to
certain topical agents or dressings, complicating treatment further. Emerging treatments, such as skin
substitutes and growth factor therapies, show promise, but are often expensive and not widely accessible
[7].
The depth and percentage of burned area of the body is the guide for the treatment plan. There are very
different approaches to treat a burn, so each therapy plan has to be personalized for the patients
specific injuries.
The first 48 hours
In the first 48 hours after a burn injury, the body experiences critical physiological changes, which
require careful monitoring and assessment. This period is vital for evaluating the extent of the
burn and planning appropriate treatment to prevent complications such as infection and fluid loss.
Burn wounds tend to expand during this time because of extra thermal energy, so a mild burn could turn
into a serious injury.
If burns are minor, they should be cooled slightly and be kept clean to
prevent progressive tissue damage and infection. If burns are deeper, cover a larger area of the
body or are located in vulnerable parts of the body such as the face or the genital region, they
need special treatment in a burn care unit. In every case, the assessment of burns should be done by
a specialist as even minor burns can have serious consequences. If treated incorrectly, burn wounds
can lead to infection and sepsis, which can even be life threatening. In general, small superficial
burns are debrided, desinfected and kept moist for 24 to 48 hours. [2][7]
Depth Assessment
The evaluation of burn depth is essential for the determination of treatment protocols. In theory, there is no problem in differentiating between the degrees of burns. Burn grade 2a is still supplied with blood, while 2b is a white wound bed that is not supplied with blood and usually requires surgery. The assessment of the wound and the decision to operate and remove the dead tissue is only made after 24 to 48 hours. There are different assessment techniques with different pros and cons.
Technique | Description | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
Clinical assessment [6] | Healthcare professionals evaluate the size, depth, and severity of the burn by inspecting the wound's appearance, assessing the patient's pain level, checking for signs of infection, and determining whether any other injuries or complications exist. |
(+) Quick (+) Non-invasive (+) Expertise (+) Cheap |
(-) Often inaccurate, especially for moderate depth burns (-) Subjective (-) Difficulties with different skin tones |
Biopsy [7][8] | A small sample of burn tissue is extracted using a punch biopsy technique, and thin sections of this tissue are examined by a pathologist after staining with hematoxylin and eosin. This staining allows for the evaluation of cellular vitality and the degree of tissue denaturation caused by the burn. |
(+) Accurate burn depth (+) Objective |
(-) Unrepresentative as only one small area is examined (-) Sampling errors (-) Invasive (-) Possible scarring (-) Long wait time (-) Expensive |
Laser Doppler Imaging [7][9] | This method operates on the principles of Doppler effect, where laser light directed at moving blood cells reflects back with a frequency change proportional to the blood flow in the tissue. This allows for real-time monitoring of micro-circulation beneath the skin surface. |
(+) Reliable (+) Non-invasive (+) Fast (+) Objective (+) Broad assessment area |
(-) Expensive (-) Specialists needed (-) Limited use on certain skin types and skin conditions (-) Environment-sensitive (temperature, movements) |
The biggest problem with currently used assessment techniques is the price. Accurate methods are
expensive and therefore not very accessible, but just an inspection of the wound is too inaccurate
and risky. Some methods are even skin-tone dependent, limiting them even further for use.
Debridement
Debridement is a medical procedure that involves the removal of dead, damaged, or infected tissue from a wound to promote healing and prevent infection. It is the key step in burn wound treatment as it removes obstacles to the healing process, reduces the risk of infection, and prepares the wound bed for further treatment, such as grafting or closure. By facilitating a clean environment, debridement significantly enhances the body’s natural healing response and improves overall outcomes for patients. [9]
Type of Debridement | Description | Used for | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
Surgical Debridement [11] | Physical removal of necrotic tissue with surgical instruments (scalpel, scissors) |
- Deep burns with significant necrosis - Infected wounds |
(+) Fast and effective for large areas (+) Allows immediate wound cleaning and grafting |
(-) Invasive, painful (-) Risk of bleeding and infection (-) Requires anesthesia |
Mechanical Debridement [11] | Uses external force (wet-to-dry dressings, hydrotherapy) to remove dead tissue |
- Superficial burns - Moderate necrotic tissue |
(+) Simple, cheap (+) Can be done at the bedside |
(-) Very painful (-) May damage healthy tissue |
Enzymatic Debridement [11] | Topical enzymes (e.g. collagenase, bromelain) digest necrotic tissue and remove eschar (crust of dead tissue) |
- Moderate burns with necrosis - Deep burns - Eschar-heavy wounds |
(+) Selective to dead tissue, preserves healthy tissue (+) Less painful (+) Effective for eschar removal (+) Reduces need for surgery |
(-) Slower than surgery (-) may cause irritations |
Autolytic Debridement [11] | Body’s natural enzymes digest necrotic tissue under moisture-retentive dressings (hydrogels, hydrocolloids) |
- Small wounds - Patients unable to tolerate aggressive methods |
(+) Painless, non-invasive (+) Selective to dead tissue (+) Easy to apply |
(-) Very slow process |
A mechanical cleaning is often needed in the beginning as the wound is likely to contain molten
fabrics or other foreign substances. After that, it is important to disinfect and debride the wound,
so it can heal properly [9][3]. If possible, surgical intervention is avoided
as it increases the infection risk and puts the patient in a lot of pain. Therefore, it is necessary
to be sure about the depth and condition of the wound, so the patient's health will not be put at further risk.
Dressings
Burn wound dressings protect the injured area, promote healing, and prevent
complications such as infection. They create a moist, insulated environment, that supports tissue
regeneration while keeping harmful bacteria out. Burn wound dressings also help manage exudate,
minimize pain, and reduce the risk of further trauma to the healing tissue.
They can be categorized into three main types: conventional, biological and synthetic dressings.
[6]
Dressing Type | Description | Used for | Pros | Cons | Examples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional Dressings | Gauze and cotton-based, highly absorbent materials | Small to moderate burns with less exudate |
(+) Highly absorbent (+) Non-adherent inner layer reduces pain during changes |
(-) Risk of infection from exudate contamination (-) May cause tissue trauma upon removal (-) much waste |
Gamgee tissue pad |
Biological Dressings | Derived from natural tissues, including skin (allografts, xenografts, tissue derivatives) | Severe burns, when donor skin is limited |
(+) Natural tissue integration (+) not much donor skin needed |
(-) Risk of rejection or infection (-) Limited mechanical properties in xenografts |
Allografts (human donor skin), Xenografts (porcine skin) |
Synthetic Dressings | Made from foams, films, sprays, composites, and gels, each with specific properties | Moderate to severe burns, for patients needing flexible, quick solutions |
(+) Fast application (+) Provides a moisture-balanced environment (+) Customizable for different needs |
(-) Potential toxicity (-) may not handle excessive exudate (-) much waste |
Tegaderm |
Dressings for burn wounds must fulfill several important requirements to enable effective healing.
They should be easy to apply without prior preparation and must regulate fluid balance to counteract
significant fluid loss through evaporation and exudation. Maintaining a moist environment is crucial
as it promotes granulation and epithelialization. Dressings should allow optimal water vapor
transfer without causing tissue desiccation or excessive moisture that could lead to maceration. It
is important to absorb the wound fluids as they are a natural breeding ground for pathogenic
bacteria.
Dressings must also be permeable to gases such as oxygen and carbon dioxide, which are
essential for cellular activity and healing. Adhesive properties are important to prevent slippage
and leakage while ensuring easy and painless removal. The materials used should be free of toxic,
carcinogenic or allergenic substances to avoid adverse reactions. These criteria ensure that burn
dressings not only protect the wound, but also promote the overall healing process and minimize
complications. Additionally, it would be optimal to reduce waste to keep environmental pollution at a
minimum.
Hydrogels
Hydrogels have emerged as a promising solution for wound treatment because of their unique
properties, including high water content, biocompatibility, and the ability to provide a moist
healing environment. This promotes cell formation and accelerates the healing process.
Generally, a dry environment tends to hinder the formation of new cells, while a moist
environment has a beneficial effect on the healing process, as it helps to reduce eschar formation
[5]. Moreover, hydrogels can be loaded with water-soluble drugs, such as antimicrobial agents, to combat
infections.
Currently used hydrogels are synthesized chemically, which leads to a higher rate of allergic
reactions. In medical jargon, a hydrogel is a paste that needs to be applied to the skin by hand.
This often leads to mechanical irritation and may cause pain [1].
NexoBrid is a specialized enzymatic debridement hydrogel primarily composed of bromelain, an enzyme
derived from pineapple stems. It selectively removes eschar and dead or damaged tissue from deep
burn wounds without harming the surrounding healthy tissue. It is stored as a powder containing 2 percent
bromelain. For application, it needs to be mixed with water to form a gel. This gel is often referred
to as a hydrogel due to its gel-like consistency, which allows easy application by qualified staff.
[https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2022/20220621155885/anx_155885_en.pdf]
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
(+) Selective debridement: Bromelain only targets necrotic tissue and preserves viable
tissue, which is essential for wound healing and reduces the need for surgical
intervention. (+) Less invasive: Unlike surgical debridement, NexoBrid avoids the need for surgery and anesthesia, making it a less painful and less traumatic option. (+) Time: It quickly removes eschar, which reduces the risk of infection and allows for faster wound healing. (+) Reduced need for skin grafts: By preserving more of the patient's own tissue, bromelain may reduce the necessity for skin grafts in some cases. |
(-) Pain during application: NexoBrid can cause significant pain as the bromelain
concentration is relatively high and patients may require analgesics or anesthesia
during treatment. (-) Expensive: NexoBrid can be costly compared to other debridement methods. (-) Potential for irritation: The high enzyme concentration can cause irritation to surrounding skin, requiring careful application and monitoring. |
NexoBrid is primarily used for 2a to 3rd degree burns. It is a good alternative to surgical
intervention and promotes wound healing by removing eschar and dead skin cells. But its use has to
be carefully considered as the high bromelain concentrations may cause pain and irritations.