. (). (view online)

Notebook | TU-Eindhoven - iGEM 2024

Notebook

Write that down! Write that down!

~ Spongebob Squarepants
Take a look around the summary of our lab activities and full notebook!

E. coli BL21 BMV isolation

  • June 16, 2024

    Small culture BL21

    A culture tube was prepared with 8 mL LB broth and 8 µL kanamycin. A small amount of the BL21 glycerol stock was inoculated into the culture tube. The small culture was incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

  • June 17, 2024

    Large culture BL21

    A culture flask with 250 mL of autoclaved TSB medium was prepared. 250 µL kanamycin was added. The 8 mL small culture of BL21 was inoculated into the culture flask and this large culture was incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

  • June 18, 2024

    BL21 BMV isolation

    The large culture was pelleted at 6.000 x g for 20 min. at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and filtered with a 0.2 µm pore size filter. The supernatant was filtered further with 100 kDa Amicon filters. The retentate was collected and analysed with Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS).

  • June 19, 2024

    BL21 BMV sample - DLS measurement

    The prepared BL21 BMV sample was analysed with DLS. The number mean and intensity mean did not correspond to the expected size range for BMVs. Therefore, it was decided to look for an improved protocol.

M. smegmatis mc² 155 BMV isolation

  • August 13, 2024

    Determining penicillin concentration

    Three culture tubes were made with 7.2 mL 7H9 Middlebrook and 800 µL ADC enrichment per tube. A small amount of the M. smegmatis mc² 155 glycerol stock was inoculated into the culture tube. To identify correct penicillin concentration, a different concentration was added to each culture tube; 20 units/mL, 75 units/mL and 150 units/mL.
    The small cultures were incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

    Next to that, 2 L of Sauton's minimal medium was prepared and autoclaved.

  • August 15, 2024

    Large culture M. smegmatis

    The three small cultures of M. smegmatis were analysed with OD600 value. The OD600 of the small culture with 75 units/mL penicillin was comparable with the OD600 that is mentioned in literature. Therefore, this concentration was chosen as the standard penicillin concentration.

    The small culture was inoculated into a large culture of 330 mL Sauton's minimal medium with 75 units/mL penicillin. The OD600 was measured every hour (Table 1).

    OD600 measurement of large culture of M. smegmatis with Sauton's minimal medium.
    Time OD600
    11:10 0.001
    14:10 0.010
    15:10 0.012
    16:10 0.006
    17:10 0.011

    Although there seemed to be no growth, the large culture was incubated overnight.
  • August 16, 2024

    Large culture M. smegmatis

    The OD600 of the large culture was measured again. There was still no growth visible after 24 hours. Therefore, it was decided to redo the experiment with fresh Sauton's minimal medium.

  • August 23, 2024

    Small culture M. smegmatis

    Three small cultures of M. smegmatis in 7H9 Middlebrook with 75 units/mL penicillin were made and incubated overnight at at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

  • August 26, 2024

    Large culture M. smegmatis

    Small culture of M. smegmatis was inoculated in fresh Sauton's minimal medium large culture. OD600 was measured (Table 2).

    OD600 measurement of large culture of M. smegmatis with Sauton's minimal medium.
    Time OD600
    10:00 0.056
    12:30 0.067
    13:45 0.003
    15:30 0.000
    16:15 0.001

    It was concluded that Sauton's minimal medium is insufficient for M. smegmatis survival. Therefore, an improved minimal medium was made.
  • August 27, 2024

    Improved Sauton's minimal medium

    Yeast extract was added in three different concentrations to the Sauton's minimal medium: 1 g/L, 5 g/L and 10 g/L. Next to that, a large culture with 7H9 Middlebrook and 10% ADC enrichment was tested. The OD600 was measured to monitor the growth (Table 3).

    OD600 measurement of large culture of M. smegmatis with Sauton's minimal medium and different yeast extract concentrations
    Time 7H9 Middlebrook with ADC 1 g/L yeast extract 5 g/L yeast extract 10 g/L yeast extract
    9:30 0.041 0.056 0.055 0.047
    10:45 0.040 0.043 0.035 0.037
    12:00 0.047 0.051 0.040 0.046
    13:50 0.073 0.058 0.040 0.040
    15:20 0.096 0.062 0.061 0.061
    9:00 - Next day 0.774 2.017 1.503 0.620
    10:15 0.893 2.212 1.721 0.702

    As M. smegmatis grows best in Sauton's minimal medium with 1 g/L yeast extract, this was chosen as the large culture growth medium.

  • Augustus 30, 2024

    Small culture M. smegmatis

    Three small cultures of M. smegmatis in 7H9 Middlebrook with 75 units/mL penicillin were made and incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

  • September 2, 2024

    Large culture with improved Sauton's minimal medium

    Small culture of M. smegmatis was inoculated in a large culture of 350 mL fresh Sauton's minimal medium with 1 g/L yeast extract and 75 units/mL penicillin. The starting OD600 of the large culture was 0.089. The large culture was incubated at 37 °C at 200 rpm. 4 hours later, the OD600 was 0.271. The large culture was incubated overnight.

  • September 3, 2024

    Addition of ADC enrichment to improved medium

    The OD600 of the large culture was measured again and was 0.074. This suggested that the large culture did not survive. Next to that, floating particles were visible in the medium, which usually mean death cells. Therefore, a new large culture was made with Sauton's minimal medium with 1 g/L yeast extract and 75 units/mL penicillin. But this time, also 35 mL of ADC enrichment was added. The starting OD600 was 0.036. The large culture was incubated at 37 °C at 200 rpm overnight.

  • September 4, 2024

    Washing and inoculation of large culture

    The OD600 of the large culture was measured again and was 1.756. The large culture was pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min. at 3.200 x g at RT. The cells were washed two times with Sauton's minimal medium. After washing, the cells were resuspended in Sauton's minimal medium and inoculated in three flasks with 315 mL Sauton's minimal medium, 1 g/L yeast extract, 35 mL ADC enrichment, 75 units/mL penicillin and 17.5 µL Tween-80 (0.005%). The cells were incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm and monitored the next day until OD600 reached ~2.0 to 2.5.

  • September 5, 2024

    Filtering of large culture

    Large culture was centrifuged in three 400 mL centrifuge bottles at 4 °C for 20 min. at 8.000 x g. Supernatant was collected and filtered with 0.45 and 0.2 µm vacuum filters. After this, the filtered supernatant was concentrated with 30 kDa Amicon filters. The retentate was collected and a two-step centrifugation was done, first at 4.000 × g and then at 15.000 × g, both steps 4 °C for 20 min.

  • September 6, 2024

    Ultracentrifugation at 65,000 x g.

    Half of the filtered sample was further concentrated via ultracentrifugation at 4 °C at 65.000 x g for 4 hours. After this, the pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES buffer and stored in the fridge. The other half of the sample was stored for transport to Nijmegen.

    Before transport of the sample to Nijmegen, a part of the sample was distributed over a 7H9 agar plate to confirm that no living bacteria were present in the sample anymore. This was grown in the incubator for around 3 days.

  • September 10, 2024

    Ultracentrifugation at 100.000 x g.

    The 7H9 agar plate was checked for colonies. No colonies were visible, meaning that sample was safe for transportation out of the lab

    The sample was packaged in a styrofoam box, filled with ice. This box was sealed with tape and placed in a plastic bag for convenient transportation. At the lab in Nijmegen, 14 mL of sample was ultracentrifuged at 4 °C at 100.000 x g for 4 hours. After this, the pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES buffer and transported back to the lab in Eindhoven. On the next days, DLS measurements were performed on both samples.

  • September 17, 2024

    Small culture of M. smegmatis

    Three small cultures of M. smegmatis in 7H9 Middlebrook with 75 units/mL penicillin were made and incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

  • September 19, 2024

    Large culture of M. smegmatis

    Small culture of M. smegmatis was inoculated in a large culture of 315 mL fresh Sauton's minimal medium with 1 g/L yeast extract, 75 units/mL penicillin and 35 mL of ADC enrichment. The starting OD600 of the large culture was 0.035. The large culture was incubated at 37 °C at 200 rpm. The growth was monitored.

  • September 20, 2024

    Washing and inoculation of large culture

    When OD600 reached ~1, the large culture was pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min. at 3.200 x g at RT. The cells were washed two times with Sauton's minimal medium. After washing, the cells were resuspended in Sauton's minimal medium and inoculated in two flasks with 315 mL Sauton's minimal medium, 1 g/L yeast extract, 35 mL ADC enrichment, 75 units/mL penicillin and 17.5 µL Tween-80 (0.005%). The cells were incubated over the weekend at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

  • September 23, 2024

    Ultracentrifugation at 65.000 x g

    Large culture was centrifuged in three 400 mL centrifuge bottles at 4 °C for 20 min. at 8.000 x g. Supernatant was collected and filtered with 0.45 and 0.2 µm vacuum filters. After this, the filtered supernatant was concentrated with 30 kDa Amicon filters. The retentate was collected and a two-step centrifugation was done, first at 4.000 × g and then at 15.000 × g, both steps 4 °C for 20 min.

    After this, the filtered sample was further concentrated via ultracentrifugation at 4 °C at 65.000 x g for 4 hours. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES buffer and stored in the fridge.

  • September 24, 2024

    CryoTEM and DLS

    CryoTEM (Cryogenic Transmission Electron Microscopy) was performed to visualize the particles in the sample.
    Furthermore, the sample was analyzed using DLS over the course of several days to monitor its size distribution and stability over time.

Cloning pET28a

  • June 26, 2024

    Broth

    LB broth and LB-agar were prepared.

  • June 27, 2024

    Agar plates

    We prepared two kinds of agar plates. One with 160 mL LB agar and 160 µL of 50 mg/mL kanamycin (KAN), with a final concentration of 50 µg/mL and one with 320 mL LB agar and 640 µL of 50 mg/mL hygromycin B (HYG) with a final concentration of 100 µg/mL.

  • July 1, 2024

    PCR preparation

    In preparation for the linearization PCR reaction of vector pET28a, the primers were diluted to 10 µM.

  • July 8, 2024

    pET28a linearization

    We linearized pET28a and then put the sample on an agarose gel. The gel confirmed that the pET28a linearization was successful.

  • July 9, 2024

    pET28a Gibson assembly

    We preformed a Gibson assembly on pET28a with (1a) OmpAN21-GFP, (1b) OmpA-GFP, (2a) CysSpycatcher and (2b) Spytag-GFP. After that the Gibson assembled plasmids were transformed into E. coli TOP10 cells by heat shock and plated onto LB agar with with 50 µg/mL KAN.

  • July 10, 2024

    Gibson-assembled pET28a plasmids

    The TOP10 cells with the Gibson-assembled pET-28a plasmids resulted in colonies for inserts 1a, 2a and 2b but not for 1b. Therefore, three small cultures were started for 1a, three for 2a and two for 2b, using 8 mL of LB broth + 8 µL KAN (50 µg/mL).

  • July 11, 2024

    TOP10 cells small culture

    The small cultures of TOP10 cells containing plasmids (1a) pET28a_OmpAN21-GFP, (2a) pET28a_CysSpycatcher and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP were miniprepped and the concentrations were checked with the nanodrop.

  • July 12, 2024

    Gibson Assembled plasmid 1b

    Since the transformation of the Gibson assembled plasmid pET28a_OmpA-GFP (1b) did not result in any colonies, we decided to transfrom 1b into TOP10 cells again.

  • July 15, 2024

    Miniprepped plasmids 1a, 2a and 2b

    The miniprepped plasmids of (1a) pET28a_OmpAN21-GFP, (2a) pET28a_CysSpycatcher and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP were sent for sequencing by Azenta. In the mean time, we put the miniprepped plasmids on an agarose gel to visualize our plasmids. The bands were at the expected places, meaning that we successfully created our desired plasmid.

  • July 16, 2024

    Transformation of 1b & Transformation into E. coli BL21 cells for 1a, 2a and 2b

    The heat shock transformation of (1b) pET28a_OmpA-GFP did not result in colonies, so we retried the Gibson assembly and then transformed again into TOP10 cells. The Gibson Assembly was performed with the same reaction conditions as the first experiment. The miniprepped plasmids (1a) pET28a_OmpAN21-GFP, (2a) pET28a_CysSpycatcher and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP were transformed into E. coli BL21 cells by heat shock for protein expression.

  • July 17, 2024

    Azenta results

    The (1a) pET28a_OmpAN21-GFP, (2a) pET28a_CysSpycatcher and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP returned from Azenta, but the results were nonspecific, with each sample yielding more than one distinct sequence. We decided to return to the step of growing TOP10 small cultures from a colony. Since we only had colonies of 2a, we started small cultures from those and we transformed the Gibson assembly products of 1a and 2b into TOP10 cells via heat shock.

  • July 18, 2024

    Transformation of 1a and 2b

    Transformations of (1a) pET28a_Ompa-GFP and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP into TOP10 cells resulted in 2 colonies for (1a) and no colonies for (2b), therefore we transformed (2b) into TOP10 cells again.

  • July 19, 2024

    Small culture 1a and 1b

    The heat shock transformation of (1a) pET28a_OmpaN21-GFP and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP into TOP10 cells resulted in colonies, so for each, small cultures were made.

  • July 22, 2024

    Small culture 2a & glycerol stocks 1a and 2b

    Small cultures of (2a) pET28a_CysSpycatcher were made and glycerol stocks of the (1a) pET28a_OmpAN21-GFP and (2b) pET28a_Spytag-GFP small cultures were made.

  • July 23, 2024

    Gibson Assembly 1b

    Since the transformation of (1b) pET28a_OmpA-GFP failed again, we decided to linearize the pET28a plasmid before we did Gibson Assembly of (1b). After Gibson Assembly, the transformation was done into TOP10 cells heat shock.

    For TOP10 cells containing (2a) pET28a_CysSpyCatcher, glycerol stocks were made. Now, the successful transformed small cultures of TOP10 cells containing plasmids (1a) OmpAN21-GFP, (2a) CysSpycatcher and (2b) Spytag-GFP were miniprepped and send to Azenta for sequencing.

  • July 24, 2024

    Transformation 1b

    The transformation of (1b) pET28a_OmpA-GFP finally resulted in a colony. We started a small culture with this colony.

  • July 25, 2024

    Glycerol stocks 1b & Transformation 1b into BL21 cells

    The small culture of (1b) pET28a_OmpA-GFP was used to make glycerol stocks and miniprepped. Afterwards, an agarose gel was made to visualize the (1b) plasmid. The gel was deemed successful and (1b) was send to Azenta for sequencing. Then, 1b was transformed into BL21 cells by heat shock for protein expression.

  • July 26, 2024

    Sequence confirmation 1a, 2a, and 2b

    The transformation of (1b) pET28a_OmpA-GFP into BL21 cells resulted in colonies.

    The Azenta results of plasmids (1a) OmpAN21-GFP, (2a) CysSpycatcher and (2b) Spytag-GFP showed that the sequences were correct, so we started small cultures with the BL21 colonies. Although we were still waiting on the Azenta results of (1b), we already started small cultures with BL21 colonies of (1b) as well.

  • July 31, 2024

    Large culture 2a and 2b

    The OD600 was measured until the required value 0.6 was reached. Afterwards, the Ni-columns for protein purification were made.

  • August 1, 2024

    Protein purification

    The CysSpycatcher and Spytag-GFP proteins were isolated by iMAC purification. SDS-PAGE gels showed good results, both 2a and 2b were visible at the expected molecular weights. In total 11.28 mg (2a) CysSpycatcher and 2.92 mg (2b) Spytag-GFP was extracted.

  • August 7, 2024

    Sequence confirmation 1b

    Something went wrong with the sample preparation of 1b, so a new sample was made today. (1b) was sent to Azenta for sequencing. The results confirmed that we finally had the desired recombinant plasmid.

    (1a) and (1b) are expressed in E. coli BL21 and prepared for Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) to check expression. The next steps can be seen in the timelines below: OmpA(N21) and OmpA with GFP and OmpA(N21) and OmpA - Antibody staining.

    (2a) and (2b) are used for the post-insertion method. The next steps can be seen in the notebook about Functionalization M. smegmatis.

OmpA(N21) and OmpA with GFP

  • August 26, 2024

    Small culture of OmpA(N21) and OmpA

    A culture tube was prepared with 8 mL LB broth and 8 µL kanamycin. A small amount of the transformed BL21 glycerol stock was inoculated into the culture tube. The small culture was incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

    Two culture flasks were prepared with 1L of 2YT growth medium. These flasks autoclaved and stored in the fridge.

  • Augustus 27, 2024

    Large culture OmpA(N21) and OmpA

    A blank was prepared from the 2YT growth medium for OD600 measurements. The small cultures were inoculated into the large culture flasks. These were incubated at 37 °C at 200 rpm. The growth was monitored until the culture reached a OD600 of ~0.6.
    The larges culture of OmpA and OmpA(N21) were induced with 100 µL of 1M IPTG.

    The four large cultures were incubated overnight at 18 °C at 150 rpm.

  • August 28, 2024

    Preparation FACS samples

    10 mL of each culture flask was collected into seperate 15 mL falcon tubes. FACS measurements were performed.

OmpA(N21) and OmpA - Antibody staining

  • September 17, 2024

    Small culture of OmpA(N21) and OmpA

    A culture tube was prepared with 8 mL LB broth and 8 µL kanamycin. A small amount of the transformed BL21 glycerol stock was inoculated into the culture tube. The small culture was incubated overnight at 37 °C at 200 rpm.

    Four culture flasks were prepared with 1L of 2YT growth medium. These flasks autoclaved and stored in the fridge.

  • Septembr 18, 2024

    Large culture of OmpA(N21) and OmpA

    A blank was prepared from the 2YT growth medium for OD600 measurements. The small cultures were inoculated into the large culture flasks. These were incubated at 37 °C at 200 rpm. The growth was monitored until the culture reached a OD600 of ~0.6.
    One large culture of OmpA was induced with 100 µL of 1M IPTG at a OD600 of 0.889, one was not induced for a negative control. One large culture of OmpA(N21) was induced with 100 µL of 1M IPTG at a OD600 of 0.794, one was again not induced for a negative control.

    The four large cultures were incubated overnight at 18 °C at 150 rpm.

  • September 19, 2024

    Antibody staining

    15 mL of bacteria culture for each sample for the FACS measurement was collected. The cells were pelleted at 3.200 x g for 20 min. at °4 C. The pellet was washed twice with PBS enriched with 0.5% BSA. After this, the pellet was incubated with 125 µL of primary antibody at a concentration of 0.5 µg/mL in PBS (0.5% BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature.

    After incubation with the primary antibody, the cells were washed twice. After this, they were incubated with secondary antibody at a concentration of 5 µg/ml in PBS (0.5% BSA) for 1 hour at room temperature.

    After incubation with the primary antibody, the cells were washed twice and inoculated in 5 mL PBS (0.5% BSA). FACS measurements were performed.

Cloning pCHERRY3

  • June 26, 2024

    Broth

    LB broth and LB-agar were prepared.

  • June 27, 2024

    Agar plates

    Prepared two kinds of agar plates. One with 160 mL LB agar and 160 µL of 50 mg/mL kanamycin (KAN), with a final concentration of 50 µg/mL and one with 320 mL LB agar and 640 µL of 50 mg/mL hygromycin B (HYG) with a final concentration of 100 µg/mL.

  • July 1, 2024

    PCR preparation

    In preparation for the linearization PCR reaction of vector pCHERRY3, the primers were diluted to 10 µM.

  • July 2, 2024

    dH5α cells colonies

    dH5α cells containing pCHERRY3 had fully covered the agar plate, leaving no single isolated colony, so a touch of a pipet tip of the bacteria was resuspended in 1 mL of LB broth. This was diluted 1000x in LB broth and 100 µL was plated onto LB agar with 100 µg/mL HYG. Two such plates were made: one was incubated overnight at 37 °C and another one at room temperature (RT).

  • July 3, 2024

    dH5α cells colonies

    dH5α cells containing pCHERRY3 had formed single isolated colonies, so a small culture was inoculated (8 mL LB broth + 160 µL HYG) and incubated overnight at 250 rpm and 37 °C.

  • July 4, 2024

    PCR preparation

    We realised we did not add the correct HYG concentration to the small culture of the dH5α cells containing pCHERRY3, so no bacteria had grown. A new small culutre was inoculated (8 mL LB broth + 16 µL HYG) at 100 µg/mL and incubated overnight at 250 rpm and 37 °C.

  • July 5, 2024

    Small culture of dH5α cells

    The small culture of dH5α cells containing pCHERRY3 was used to make glycerolstocks (550 µL culture + 450 µL glycerol). The small culture was also used to miniprep to isolate pCHERRY3.

  • July 8, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    We attempted to linearize pCHERRY3, then put the sample on gel to see whether the linearization was successful. The gel suggested that the linearisation was unsuccessful.

  • July 9, 2024

    pCHERRY3 lineazisation

    The lineazisation of pCHERRY3 was attempted again, but with a changed annealing temparature, namely from 65 °C to 67 °C. The agarose gel that we ran afterwards suggested that the linearization had failed again.

  • July 10, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    Linearization of pCHERRY3 plasmid was reattempted with different annealing temperatures, namely 55, 60 and 65 °C. The concentration of the pCHERRY3 samples were quite low, indicating that the linearization had failed again.

  • July 11, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    The linearization of pCHERRY3 was reattempted with an extension time of 420 s instead of 165 s (75 s/kb instead of 30 s/kb). This was performed at annealing temperatures 55, 60, 65, 66 and 67 °C and 34 cycles were performed instead of 32.

  • July 12, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    A new agarose gel was prepared to visualize the PCR products of the pCHERRY3 linearization with extension time 420 s and varying annealing temperatures (55, 60, 65, 66 and 67 °C). Only at annealing temperature 55 °C a band showed up, but not the correct one. We decided to retry the gel with the same samples to eliminate human error.

  • July 15, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    A new agarose gel was prepared to visualize the PCR products of the pCHERRY3 linearization with extension time 420 s and varying annealing temperatures (55, 60, 65, 66 and 67 °C). The band that was shown the second time was was a fat smear, so the linearization failed.

  • July 16, 2024

    pCHERRY3 Digestion

    Since the band on the agarose gel resulted into a fat smear, we wanted to perform a restriction of the plasmid to check if it is the correct sequence. The plasmid was restricted by XbaI, PstI, HindIII and AgeI.

  • July 17, 2024

    pCHERRY3 digestion

    An agarose gel was made to visualize the result of the digestion of pCHERRY3 with PstI, SbaI, AgeI and HindIII. We only saw a smear of DNA fragments which indicated that we were using the incorrect plasmid. We decided to start a new culture of cells and do miniprep again.

  • July 18, 2024

    New dH5α cells colonies containing pCHERRY3

    We made small cultures with a higher HYG concentration than the previous time, one with 100 µg/mL and one small culture with 180 µg/mL.

  • July 19, 2024

    dH5α cells containing pCHERRY3

    The small cultures with the higher HYG concentration were much more red, suggesting that it contained more dH5α cells containing pCHERRY3.

  • July 22, 2024

    New dH5α with pCHERRY3 streak plate

    We made a new dH5α with pCHERRY3 streak plate.

  • July 23, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    A new linearization of pCHERRY3 was performed with 34 PCR cycles instead of 32. On the streak plate of dH5α with pCHERRY3, many colonies with a pinkish color had appeared, indicating that they indeed contained pCHERRY3. Three small cultures were made from a single colony, with a hygromycin B concentration of 180 µg/mL.

  • July 24, 2024

    Small culture of dH5α with pCHERRY3

    The small cultures of dH5α with pCHERRY3 were miniprepped, resulting in three samples, then the concentration was measured with the nanodrop. Afterwards the miniprepped samples were put on an agarose gel. Next, the samples were send to Azenta for a sequencing check. With the new miniprepped samples, we retried linearization. To increase the chance of success, we varied two parameters: we used four annealing temperatures: 60, 63, 65 and 67 °C and we used two different template concentrations (0.01 and 0.02 ng/µL, while the protocol only indicates to use 0.01 ng/µL).

  • July 25, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    We put the samples on an agarose gel to analyze the results. However, there the correct band was not visible, indicating that the linearization had failed again, but that there was a contamination. Therefore, we decided to perform a gel extraction of the sample.

  • July 26, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    To even further increase the chance of a successful linearization, we performed a restriction first with PstI.

  • August 12, 2024

    New pCHERRY3 plasmid

    We made a new dH5α with pCHERRY3 streak plate, since we wanted to start fresh again. Small cultures was also started and was turning red which is in indication that the pCHERRY3 was present in the sample.

  • August 13, 2024

    New pCHERRY3 plasmid

    We miniprepped the new pCHERRY3 plasmid which was send to Azenta for sequencing.

  • August 15, 2024

    Sequence confirmation pCHERRY3

    The Azenta results came back confirming that we had the right plasmid sequence!

  • August 19, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    A new linearization was tried on the checked pCHERRY3 plasmid with an extension time of 210 s and an annealing temperature of 67°C.

  • August 20, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    An agarose gel was ran on the previously made samples, but to no luck. The wrong band was visible.

  • August 22, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    We used the supplied buffer in the PCR clean up process instead of nuclease free water, then ran an agarose gel again. But to no luck, the wrong band was visible again.

  • August 26, 2024

    pCHERRY3 digestion

    We tried a pCHERRY3 digestion again with the restriction enzymes: BamHI, PstI and HindIII. The samples were then loaded into an agarose gel to check whether the digestion was succesful, which it was! We decided to further linearize with PstI digested pCHERRY3 plasmid. We ran a PCR program that has been used before with an extension time of 210 s, with 33 cycles and an annealing temperature of 67 °C.

  • August 28, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    We ran an agarose gel to analyze our linearization. However, the gels showed no results.

  • August 29, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    It was suggested to us to try to linearize with a different protocol than the one we had used previously, namely switching from Phusion Master Mix to Q5. This time we prepared three samples: one with a double primer concentration, one adding a CG enhancer and both.

  • August 30, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    The agarose gel with the ran samples showed no result, indicating that the linearization had failed again. We decided to order new primers and try the linearization again.

  • September 4, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    The new primers arrived! We decided to mix the new and old primers to see whether that had any influence. We ended up with 4 new samples: one with new primers with the use of Q5, new primers with Phusion Master Mix, one with new forward primer and old reverse primer with Q5 and lastly the fourth sample with the old forward primer an the new reverse primer with Q5.

  • September 5, 2024

    pCHERRY3 linearization

    We visualized the four samples on an agarose gel, and the bands were still not at the right place, thus the linearization had failed again. We tried one more time with a longer extension time of 6 minutes in stead of 3.5 to see whether that had any influence. But the gel showed the wrong results once again. We decided to switch to restriction-ligation to create our recombinant plasmids.

  • September 18, 2024

    pCHERRY3 restriction ligation

    While we were waiting for the new gBlock and primers, and since time was running out, we added our gBlock without first multiplying with PCR. So the concentration of the gBlock was a bit lower than we would have wanted. We only used PorinN50 (3c) for this and then thus did a plasmid digestion with pCHERRY3, (3c) and GFP for pCHERRY3.

  • September 19, 2024

    pCHERRY3 restriction ligation

    We ran a gel on the digested pCHERRY3 plasmid to preform gel extraction and then performed the ligation and put the sample to react overnight in the fridge.

  • September 20, 2024

    pCHERRY3 restriction ligation

    We transformed the made ligation into TOP10 cells, we added 8 µL of the sample instead of 2 µL, since the DNA concentration after the ligation was quite low.

  • September 23, 2024

    pCHERRY3 restriction ligation

    On the plate two types of colonies were visible: one red (indicating the ligation had failed) and a white one. The white one could be our plasmid, so small cultures were made from the one colony to send to Azenta.

  • September 24, 2024

    pCHERRY3 restriction ligation

    The small cultures that were made had grown, so we made glycerol stocks and miniprepped the samples to send to Azenta for sequencing.

  • September 25, 2024

    pCHERRY3 restriction ligation

    While waiting for the Azenta results, we ran our sample on a gel to visualize the restriction ligation. The gel showed subtle indications that our plasmid was present, but it also revealed some contamination in the sample.

  • September 27, 2024

    Azenta result

    The Azenta results came back confirming that it was the wrong plasmid sequence.

Transformation M. Smegmatis

  • September 13, 2024

    Small culture

    We prepared a small culture by mixing 7H9 Middlebrook, ADC enrichment, and Penicillin, then inoculated it with M. Smegmatis glycerol stock. The culture was incubated overnight at 37 °C with shaking.

  • September 16, 2024

    Large culture

    We set up a large culture by transferring 3 mL of the small culture into 300 mL of growth medium in a 1 L flask. This was incubated overnight at 37 °C until the OD 600 reached 0.8-1.0.

  • September 17, 2024

    Cell harvesting

    Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed three times with ice-cold 10% glycerol, and resuspended in glycerol for storage at −70 °C or further use.

  • September 20, 2024

    Transformation

    We performed the transformation of M. Smegmatis with pCHERRY3 using electroporation. The elecroporation machine was set to 1.8 ms and 1.5 kV. After that, we transferred the cell suspension to 7H9-ADCenr broth for a 2-hour incubation at 37 °C. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation and plated on 7H9-ADCenr-HYG agar, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 2-3 days to allow colony formation.

  • September 23, 2024

    Small culture

    The transformation appeared to be succesfull, since the colonies were red. A small culture was made of M. Smegmatis with pCHERRY3 by inoculating 5 mL 7H9-ADCenr-HYG broth with transformant colonies, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 2-3 days.

  • September 26, 2024

    Large culture

    We prepared three large cultures of M. smegmatis in 7H9 medium and measured the OD600 several times a day until it reached a value around OD600 0.80. We incubated overnight because the OD600 was too low to proceed.

  • September 27, 2024

    Doxycycline test

    After reaching an OD600 of 0.80, we added 0.1, 1, and 5 µg/mL doxycycline to the samples to assess which concentration led to the best protein expression. However, due to significant leak expression without doxycycline, inconsistent cell densities, and time constraints, we were unable to conclusively determine the optimal doxycycline concentration based on fluorescence.

Post-insertion

  • August 2, 2024

    Preparation

    For this method, the CysSpycatcher and Spytag-GFP proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified. For more information about this procedure, see the timeline for Cloning pET28a.

  • September 25, 2024

    Check CysSpycatcher and Spytag-GFP coupling

    We incubated the purified proteins to check whether the Spycatcher and Spytag form a covalent isopeptide bond. The SDS Page gel confirmed that the coupling was successful.

  • September 26, 2024

    Micelle formation

    Since we were unable to obtain DSPE in time, we made micelles using only DSPE-Mal to test if we could still functionalize the micelles with SpyCatcher. This experiment serves as a preliminary step to explore the possibility of future post-insertion with our BMVs. We began by generating a lipid film by dissolving DSPE-Mal in methylene chloride. After removing the solvent under a nitrogen stream, the lipid film was hydrated and sonicated to form micelles. CysSpyCatcher was then added to the micellar solution and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour to allow for functionalization.

  • September 27, 2024

    Conjugation

    After incubating the micelles with CysSpyCatcher, we used spin filtration to remove excess unreacted SpyCatcher. To check if micelles were formed, we performed DLS on samples containing either DSPE-Mal alone or DSPE-Mal coupled to CysSpyCatcher. We then tested functionalization by adding SpyTag-GFP to both CysSpyCatcher-conjugated micelles and non-functionalized micelles as a control. After filtering, we assessed fluorescence to determine if SpyCatcher-functionalized micelles successfully bound SpyTag-GFP.