For us, education is more than just a series of lessons and lectures - it is the foundation for innovation and progress. We believe that fostering a deep understanding of synthetic biology is crucial for developing the next generation of scientists, engineers, and informed citizens. Education empowers individuals to explore new ideas, solve complex problems, and make informed decisions that can impact our world.
To reach and inspire a diverse audience, we have categorized our
educational initiatives into three distinct groups:
the general public,
university students and
high school students. Since each group has its own
unique needs and interests, our programs are tailored to address them
effectively. While we value broad outreach, we emphasized
quality over quantity to ensure that each participant
received a meaningful and enriching experience.
We particularly focused on high school students, recognizing them as the future leaders and innovators in synthetic biology. They deserved dedicated attention to explore and ignite their potential interest and passion for this field. Therefore, we are especially proud of our Challenge Day. This flagship event embodied our commitment to high-quality education by offering high school students a hands-on, immersive experience that not only enhanced their understanding of synthetic biology but also inspired and motivated them to pursue their ambitions in the field of synthetic biology as well and their personal ambitions. Next to the Challenge Day, we have also guided high school students with a project called Academic Skills and made a project assignment that was published on the website of our university for re-use by high schools.
To not only focus on high schools we also organized a pubquiz and made a mini game called three in the pan for the general public. For students at the university we planned on giving a lunch lecture together with our sponsor Cell4Pharma. We hope our initiatives inspired all participants and increased their understanding of synthetic biology. You can explore all about our educational activities through the various sections provided.
On Monday 17th of June, we organized the first edition of the iGEM pubquiz. We invited our family and friends to come to Hubble, a bar at our campus, and prepared fifty questions which was good for approximately two and a half hours of fun and education for our thirty seven participants with different ages and pre-knowlegde.
We had some serious hard topics for people with no prior biologic knowledge, like DNA, genetic modification, modeling, AI, bacteria and applications of synthetic biology. But, next to that, we also had some fun questions about Eindhoven, our university and random facts like how many muscles and bones humans have and how often we take a breath a day, which is actually more than 20.000x. We saw a lot of smiles during the evening and we know for sure everyone had a great time, also because we asked them afterwards in our reflection document. Seven out of ten participating teams answered at least half of the questions correctly and overall the teams scored between 40-80 points with a maximum of 100 points, which in our opinion is quite a nice distribution and scoring for a pubquiz!
The questions were presented in Dutch to make it more accessible for our target group "the general public", but we were kind enough to translate all the questions for future iGEM teams. We incorporated them into our manual on how to organize the pubquiz, which can be found on our contribution page. The manual is a compact and clear file with information and suggestions on how to organize a pubquiz and serves as a contribution to the whole iGEM community.
While writing the manual, we made use of our own experience alongside the reflection forms of our participants. We were happy to see that 100% of our participants stated they had a nice evening and did not regret coming, which was our number one goal. Next to that, we wanted to teach them more about (synthetic) biology. Approximately 75% learned something new about biology and 50% was able to give us a correct definition about synthetic biology. Our main point of improval for a next time would be to shorten the quiz and have more focus on explaining the questions and theory, so that participants would learn more.
Approximately 60-90 minutes.
The game is played in 2 to 4 teams and consists of 3 rounds. Create teams of about 3 players each. Decide together which team will start the game (this will be team 1) and determine who will be teams 2, 3, and 4. Place the iGEM TU-Eindhoven 2024 game cards in the pan or basket.
The game consists of three rounds, and in each round, one player
from the team will grab a card and explain it while the other two
team members guess what is on the card. Other teams can help, but
they do not earn points for that!
Start the timer for 30 seconds. The first participant from the starting team takes a card from the pan or basket and describes the words on the card without saying (part of) the word or using abbreviations. This continues until the 30 seconds are up. Each correctly guessed word is worth one point. Any unguessed words must be explained after the round. Round 1 ends when all cards have been used.
Put all the game cards back in the pan or basket. The game proceeds similarly to round 1, but this time, words on the card can only be described with one single word, which again cannot be (part of) the word or abbreviations. Teams earn 1 point for 1 or 2 correct words, 2 points for 3 or 4 correct words, and 5 points for all 5 correct words. No points are given for if everything is incorrect. Round 2 ends when all the cards have been used.
Place all game cards back in the pan or basket. The game proceeds the same way as in rounds 1 and 2, but this time, the words on the card must be acted out. Again, a good memory helps since the cards are still the same! Scoring is the same as in round 2.
The winning team is the one with the most points at the end of the three rounds.
We are excited to announce a lunch lecture in collaboration with our sponsor, Cell4Pharma, continuing the tradition set by the iGEM TU-Eindhoven team of 2023. For more details about our sponsor, visit our sponsor page.
This year, we will invite Biomedical Engineering students at the bachelor’s, master’s, and PhD levels to learn more about both the company and the iGEM initiative. To maximize attendance, we have partnered with the Biomedical Engineering study association, SvBMT Protagoras.
Due to scheduling constraints with the sponsor, the study association, and our own calendar, the event is scheduled for November 25th, after the Grand Jamboree. We are confident that this lecture will be engaging and offer students valuable insights into the application of synthetic biology in the business world, as well as potential career opportunities in the field of synthetic biology.
On the 11th of September 2024, iGEM TU-Eindhoven organized the second edition of the iGEM Challenge Day at Eindhoven University of Technology. We welcomed forty high school students who were in their (pre-)examination year of HAVO or VWO, which are the higher forms of education for high school in the Netherlands and prepare them for associate degrees or university. Since we believe these students are the next generation of synthetic biology engineers, we put a lot of time and effort in creating a wonderful day full of challenges.
The purpose of the Challenge Day was to create an educational and engaging experience for high school students interested in synthetic biology. Our main goal was to provide a fun, interactive day where students could learn about the subject in a hands-on, creative way. To achieve this, we focused on ensuring plenty of opportunities for interaction and problem-solving, allowing students to actively participate in the learning process.
Research in education and pedagogy has shown that interactive learning fosters a safe and supportive environment, which is crucial for both professional and personal growth. With this in mind, we designed the day to encourage curiosity, collaboration, and critical thinking. Before planning the event, we set clear learning goals, both for the students and ourselves as organizers, to ensure that the day was impactful and rewarding for everyone involved.
For the students:
For the iGEM TU-Eindhoven 2024 team:
We started preparing for this day around the end of April. That seems like a long time in advance, but we are glad we did. It took a long time before we could reach students to register. We wanted to prevent students from being forced by their teacher or school, so we decided that all students had to register themselves. However, they could indicate who they wanted to work with during the day, so they would not have to feel alone nor scared of an unknown environment. After the registration deadline at the 10th of July, we started preparing the content of the day. We divided the day in two parts: one theoretical and one practical.
As for the theoretical part, the students worked in groups of four to make a poster on which they explained a solution to a world problem using synthetic biology. At the end of the day, there was a poster market where they had to pitch their idea and poster to the other students and a jury. Everyone received a certificate of attendance and a gold medal and on top of that, the best posters were awarded with the prize of a gift card. This part of the day was very comparable to a mini iGEM journey and jamboree. To enhance the interactive aspect, each team was given 400 euros in monopoly money to invest in their favorite ideas. Investments ranged from a minimum of 50 euros to a maximum of 200 euros per team, allowing them to support between two and eight teams. The team that accumulated the most invested money won the public prize, while the jury determined the winners of the jury prize.
For the practical component, we conducted a laboratory experiment and created an escape room, both centered around the same murder mystery involving Klaas van der Maas, the owner of the diary factory in Ravensberg. In the lab, students performed DNA gel electrophoresis, which narrowed down the suspects to two individuals. In the escape room, they uncovered that Lucas O. was the culprit behind Klaas's murder. Lucas acted impulsively out of fear for his reputation in the city, a decision he later regretted. Alongside the engaging nature of these activities, we also integrated relevant links into our project and team:
The instructions for the poster assignment and escape room, as well as the lab preparations and protocols were originally in Dutch, but we translated these files for your inspiration. You can find them in the drop-downs below.
You can read more detailed information in a manual on how to organize the Challenge Day on our contribution page.
Despite meticulous preparations, the day began with an unexpected challenge: a morning strike by Dutch public transport caused some delays, leaving a few participants late. However, this did little to dampen the overall atmosphere. Students who eventually arrived were enthusiastic and eager to dive into the day, particularly the laboratory activities. After receiving safety instructions and a quick recap of what they had missed, they were able to enjoy most of the planned events.
Those who managed to arrive on time, thanks to alternative travel options, participated in a more detailed opening session. We introduced them to iGEM, not just as a competition but as a vibrant community. To kick things off, we asked them to contribute to a word cloud about their understanding of synthetic biology. Their responses highlighted that the field was relatively unfamiliar to them, with most associating it with cells, research, genetics, and biological design. We then explained our perspective: synthetic biology is about enhancing biological systems by modifying DNA and working with genetically modified organisms (GMOs), providing real-world examples along the way. Additionally, we introduced our team, project, and sponsors.
After covering iGEM and our team’s goals, we outlined the day’s activities. This included a poster assignment on synthetic biology and an engaging murder mystery, where students would solve the crime of Klaas van der Maas by conducting lab-based investigations and participating in an escape room. The storyline for this activity was met with excitement and laughter, as the students found it amusing. We concluded by sharing the day’s schedule, ensuring everyone was ready for the activities ahead.
During the poster assignment, we walked around to engage with the students, discussing their ideas and the projects they were working on. We were genuinely impressed and pleasantly surprised by their creativity, with concepts ranging from therapeutic solutions to innovations in the food industry. It was amazing to see their passion as they enthusiastically shared their ideas. By this point, their understanding of synthetic biology had significantly improved compared to the morning, and they expressed how much they had already learned. You can see some examples of their projects below:
For many students, it was their first time entering a real laboratory, and the excitement was palpable. The step-by-step protocol provided clear guidance, and there were plenty of people available to assist with any questions. We were also pleased to see how seriously the students adhered to the safety rules, ensuring a safe and organized environment for everyone. To foster a comfortable environment, we emphasized that the only "stupid" questions are the ones not asked, encouraging students to voice any uncertainties. This approach led to better understanding and a positive atmosphere. Anticipating that pipetting might be challenging for some, we had a backup gel and reference photos of the expected results. However, we were thrilled to see that many students executed the procedure correctly and were able to draw accurate conclusions before moving on to the escape room.
In the escape room, students had to deduce which of the two remaining suspects after gel-electrophoresis was responsible for Klaas’s murder. Through a series of puzzles and by mailing neighbor Babs Terium, they discovered that Lucas O. had killed Klaas, motivated by fear for his reputation—though he later regretted it. To our surprise, the students solved the mystery faster than we had anticipated, demonstrating sharp problem-solving skills. This actually worked in our favor, as it helped make up for the earlier delays in the laboratory.
After putting in so much effort and creating impressive posters, the students had the chance to present their work at the poster market, where they shared their insights with both their peers and the jury. To make it more interactive, we turned the experience into an investment game, as explained earlier. The students enthusiastically jumped into the challenge, eager to bank the most money and potentially win a prize. Some even took it a step further, doing push-ups and sit-ups to earn extra points. While this wasn't part of the plan, we were just glad they were having such a great time, and the atmosphere was amazing. It was wonderful to see students connecting with people they had never met before, which, for us, is something we are particularly proud of. It goes beyond simple education - it’s a sign of personal growth!
After the poster market, we collected the students’ money and began calculating the public prize winner while the jury deliberated on the jury prize. To keep the students engaged during this time, we invited them to take part in an evaluation. The results of this evaluation will be detailed in the “Evaluation Section.” We wanted to ensure that every participant felt valued and proud of their accomplishments, so we awarded everyone a gold medal and a participation certificate. This gesture was met with enthusiasm, and the students felt both appreciated and satisfied. We ended the day with a small pitch about synthetic biology within iGEM and the possibilities for them and thanked them for this amazing day!
We are incredibly happy to report that Challenge Day 2024 was a great success. The event ran smoothly, and the students' energy and engagement created an amazing atmosphere throughout the day. We had set high expectations for the learning goals we outlined beforehand, and we are proud to say that these goals were fully achieved.
As we had hoped, the students gained valuable insights into synthetic biology. Through the combination of theoretical and practical tasks, they not only learned more about the applications of synthetic biology but also developed essential skills such as creative thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving. Additionally, the laboratory experiment proved to be an excellent way to introduce students academic protocols, safety regulations and techniques like DNA gel electrophoresis.
For our team, we also accomplished our objectives. We gained significant experience in organizing an educational event and learned how to effectively convey scientific knowledge to a younger audience. The balance between education and fun was spot on, and we are thrilled that the students remained enthusiastic and engaged throughout the entire day.
The feedback from participants was overwhelmingly positive. Students reported feeling well-engaged and comfortable throughout the day, with particular appreciation for the interactive and practical components, such as the lab work and the poster market. The event’s educational and enjoyable atmosphere was highlighted, with 96.8% of students explaining that the day met or exceeded their expectations. The gel electrophoresis assignment in the laboratory and the poster creation activities were particularly praised as valuable and memorable. Overall, 71% of the students awarded the day 4 out of 5 and the remaining 29% even rated it 5 out of 5!
A notable 83.9% of students felt that the content was well-aligned with what they learn at school, and they found this aspect very satisfying. Additionally, 9.7% noted that while the content did not align with their school curriculum, they still enjoyed the experience.
Participants appreciated the clear pre-event instructions and found the day’s organization to be both efficient and effective. The catering met expectations, and the venue’s accessibility further enhanced the overall experience. Suggestions for improvement included better time management to prevent a crowded schedule, slightly longer breaks, and possibly replacing the escape room with a campus tour to provide a better opportunity to explore the university. Overall, the feedback was very encouraging and we saw a lot of smiles during the day. Especially when we awarded them with their gold medal and attendance certificate.
Overall, we look back on a highly successful edition of Challenge Day. The learning goals were met, the students were enthusiastic, and the feedback we received motivates us to encourage the next iGEM TU-Eindhoven team to continue this event in the future. We are proud of what we achieved as a team and hope that we have inspired many of these students to pursue further studies in science.
During our iGEM journey we guided two groups of high school students in a project about synthetic biology called AcVa (Academische Vaardigheden, ENG: Academic Skills). Later, we transformed the assignment into a project assignment that is published on the website of our university and could therefore be re-used by multiple high schools.
A high school in Eindhoven reached out to our university and asked for a project assignment in which their students could learn more about university related topics and academic skills. The university therefore reached out to the iGEM TU-Eindhoven team of 2023 to provide and guide such a project assignment in the field of synthetic biology, a field that is often undiscovered in Dutch high schools. In January 2024, the assignment was created by the team of 2023 and in February, when our team was formed, they asked if we wanted to (partly) take over the project and of course, we said yes!
From February to May the students had to find a solution for a real-world problem using synthetic biology. The assignment consisted of four parts: problem identification, social importance, solution and slogan/name for their technology. During the project, the students could reach out to the educations captains of both 2023 and 2024 for help and feedback on their project. Next to that, we also contacted them multiple times, to ask them how it was going. At the ending of the project, we were allowed to give advice on grades for the report and the process to the teachers.
As we feel education should be both ways, we asked the students to fill in a questionnaire about the project and our guidance throughout the project. The students were quite satisfied on our guidance and graded us an eight on average. They told us they learned a lot and appreciated we always responded quickly. As for the content, they felt like the assignment was little hard, because they had no prior knowlegde on synthetic biology. Making the assingment more specific and less open would help a lot.
After we succesfully guided the project, the university asked us whether we wanted the review the assignment and transform it into a project assignment that can be re-used by multiple schools. We were happy to do this, since iGEM and synthetic biology could then be promoted to different high schools and students. We filled in the template for project assingments and had multiple meetings with Emily van Leemput, who is responsible for educational design and development and is a member of the Communication Expertise Center of our university. More specifically, she works on reducing the gap between high school and univeristy by providing and organizing workshops, project assignments, master classes, challenge days and much more.
Together, we worked on making the assignment more specific and clear by making it less open, as suggested by the students of academic skills, while still leaving some space for teachers to adapt the assignment to their own target group and wishes. After we were convinced that we created a clear and appealing project assignment called "Superhero cells, the magic of synthetic biology" we published it on the website of our university under the section for teachers and deans of high schools. Whenever a school shows interest in the assignment and likes to be guided by the univerity, the Communication Expertise Center will reach out to iGEM TU-Eindhoven and ask for guidance on the project.