Software Tool (PPAP)

Prediction > Experiment ?

The Prokaryotic (Motif Based) Promoter (Strength Comparison) Analysis Program is a Python script designed to analyse and predict the strength of bacterial promoters based on conserved motifs. This program was developed specifically for Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis IL1403 using regulatory sites data obtained from the RegPrecise database: https://regprecise.lbl.gov/. It can be optimised for any species whose data is available on this site. The main purpose of developing the program was to compare 13 different promoters and determine which one would be the most efficient one to use for driving the nisK operon gene in a vector plasmid.

Image placeholder

What Are Motifs?

Motifs are short, recurring sequences of DNA that have a specific function. In the context of promoters, two key motifs are the -10 motif (also known as the Pribnow box) and the -35 motif. These motifs are recognized by the bacterial RNA polymerase, an enzyme that reads DNA and starts the process of making RNA, which ultimately leads to protein production. The -10 motif (typically `TATAAT`) is found about 10 base pairs upstream of the start site of transcription. The -35 motif (typically `TTGACA`) is located about 35 base pairs upstream of the start site.

What Are Conserved Motifs?

Conserved motifs are motifs that appear in many different promoters across different genes or organisms, often in similar positions relative to the start of transcription. These sequences are "conserved" because they play a critical role in the function of the promoter and are therefore maintained throughout evolution. 

In bacteria like Lactococcus lactis, the presence of conserved motifs in the promoter region is crucial for efficient transcription. RNA polymerase binds to these motifs to initiate the process of gene expression. If these motifs are present and well-formed, the promoter is likely to be strong, meaning it will efficiently drive the expression of the downstream gene.

How the Program Works

Figure 1: Flowchart for PPAP workflow

 

1. Parsing Regulatory Sites Data: The program begins by parsing the regulatory sites data, which is provided in a FASTA format. This data includes transcription factors (TFs), associated gene information, and the corresponding DNA sequences. The data is extracted and stored for further analysis. 

2. Extracting Upstream Sequences: The program focuses on sequences that are upstream of genes (negative positions). These upstream sequences are likely to contain promoter elements and are extracted for motif analysis. (The program first looks at the DNA sequences upstream of various genes in *Lactococcus lactis*. It searches for recurring motifs, particularly those resembling the -10 and -35 motifs. These motifs are essential for RNA polymerase to bind to the DNA and start the transcription process.) 

3. Identifying Conserved Motifs: The program identifies conserved motifs within the upstream sequences, specifically targeting the discovery of -10 (Pribnow box) and -35 motifs, which are crucial for bacterial promoter function. The program scans the sequences and counts all possible motifs of a given length (typically 6 bp). (The program counts how often these motifs appear in the promoter region. The more frequently and accurately these motifs appear, the more likely it is that the RNA polymerase will successfully bind to the promoter, making it more efficient.) 

4. Ranking Top Motifs: The program ranks the identified motifs by their frequency, selecting the most common motifs as the best candidates for the -10 and -35 promoter elements. 

5. Promoter Strength Analysis: The program then integrates the identified motifs into a scoring function that evaluates the strength of provided promoter sequences. The scoring function considers GC content and the presence of the -10 and -35 motifs. Promoters are ranked based on their computed scores. This formula combines the contributions of these factors with specific weights to generate the final score for each promoter: 

 •⁠ GC Content (30%): Higher GC content can increase the stability of the DNA helix, potentially leading to stronger promoter activity. The GC content is scaled to contribute 30% to the total score. 

 •⁠ -10 Motif (30%): The presence and frequency of the -10 motif are critical for RNA polymerase to bind effectively, directly impacting promoter strength. This also contributes 30% to the score. 

 •⁠ ⁠-35 Motif (30%): Like the -10 motif, the -35 motif is vital for promoter function. Its frequency is also weighted at 30% in the score. 

 •⁠ ⁠Additional Motifs (10%): This is a placeholder for any additional regulatory elements that could be added later. For now, it's set to contribute 10% to the total score. 

Quantitative Relevance of the custom scores: •⁠ ⁠Relative Measure of Promoter Strength: The custom score provides a relative measure of how strong a promoter is likely to be based on the presence and frequency of critical motifs and overall GC content. Promoters with higher scores are predicted to be stronger, meaning they are more likely to drive higher levels of gene expression. 

 •⁠ ⁠Predictive Value: While the score itself is an abstract number, its predictive value lies in comparing scores across different promoters. A promoter with a higher custom score should, theoretically, be more effective in initiating transcription and thus be a stronger promoter. 

 •⁠ ⁠Empirical Correlation: In a practical sense, these scores can be validated by comparing them against known/performed experimental data. If certain promoters with high custom scores consistently show strong activity in laboratory settings, the scoring method is confirmed to be predictive. 

 •⁠ ⁠Optimization in Genetic Engineering: For synthetic biology or genetic engineering applications, these scores can help researchers select the best promoters for driving gene expression in their constructs. By choosing promoters with higher custom scores, researchers can optimize the expression of target genes. 

6. Output: - The program outputs the ranked list of promoters based on their predicted strength, with the most likely strong promoters appearing at the top of the list.

Conclusion

PPAP is a powerful tool for researchers working with prokaryotes, allowing them to predict promoter strength based on conserved motif analysis. There are scarecly any analytical tools available online for Prokaryotic Promoter Comparisonal Analysis and PPAP is the first of its kind. By leveraging data from the RegPrecise database and integrating advanced motif discovery techniques, this program provides a robust analysis of promoter sequences, helping to identify the strongest promoters for use in genetic engineering and synthetic biology applications. It is a reasonable alternative to experimental analysis, but not a complete replacement.

Biological Basis: The strength of a promoter largely depends on the presence and configuration of motifs that are recognized by the transcription machinery. By identifying and analyzing these motifs, we can make informed predictions about how well a promoter will perform. 

Efficiency Prediction: If a promoter has strong, well-conserved motifs in the right positions, it's more likely to be efficient in initiating transcription. This efficiency is crucial in both natural biological processes and in applications like synthetic biology, where you might want to maximize the expression of a particular gene. 

Conserved Motifs as Indicators: Since these motifs are conserved across different species and genes, their presence is a reliable indicator of promoter strength. The program leverages this by focusing on identifying and quantifying these motifs.

Availability: Visit the PPAP Page to use the software. The entire code used to construct the tool is available at: https://gitlab.igem.org/2024/software-tools/dku