☰ Content

Introduction


Sustainability Mindmap

In order to assess how our project could improve sustainability in agriculture, we first needed to get a good understanding of what makes an agrosystem sustainable and what sustainability challenges exist in agriculture today. Therefore, on top of a lot of individual research, we also reached out to various stakeholders, including agroecologists, farmers, ethicists, and lawyers, for further insight.

Water availability, phytopathology and fertilizer use were at the core of our sustainability research as RhyzUp aims to improve crops' ability to retain water, resist drought, combat pathogens, and absorb nutrients.

Using the knowledge gained from our research and interviews, we evaluated how our project relates to the 17 United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

In the following sections, we explain how our project directly contributes to zero hunger (Goal 2), good health and well-being (Goal 3), clean water and sanitation (Goal 6), climate action (Goal 13), and life on land (Goal 15).

GOAL 2: ZERO HUNGER


600 Million

People expected to face hunger by 20301

The second of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is to eradicate hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture on a global scale. According to the United Nations, 600 million people are expected to face hunger by 2030, with 1 in 3 people already struggling with food insecurity today. Because RhyzUp addresses some of the biggest problems in crop production, the foundation of the global food system, it directly addresses the second Sustainable Development Goal.

Specifically, RhyzUp addresses Target 2.4 of the SDGs, which is stated by the UN as follows: “By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strengthen capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters and that progressively improve land and soil quality.”1

Our project addresses Goal 2 in the following ways:

  1. Improving drought resistance and water retention in crops
  2. Improving pathogen resistance in crops
  3. Improving nutrient uptake in crops

TARGET 2.4: 1) DROUGHT AND FOOD PRODUCTION

Feeding an ever-growing population is a huge challenge. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimates that 5% of annual agricultural GDP is lost to natural disasters every year2, with drought being the natural disaster that causes the most agricultural production loss. Particularly in low to middle income countries, drought as a single cause has led to 34% of crop and livestock production loss between 2008 and 2018.3 Therefore, we focused not only on drought as an issue in Switzerland but also tried to investigate how water availability is an issue globally. In the following, we address how drought, precipitation, and water management affect agriculture today and in the future.

TARGET 2.4: 1.1) DROUGHT IN SWITZERLAND

Although Switzerland is known for its abundant water resources, drought is predicted to become an increasing issue for local farmers. By 2035, precipitation is expected to increase in winter but decrease by about 15% in summer. In 2020, 4.7% of agricultural land in Switzerland was irrigated, but this figure is predicted by Agroscope to rise in future years.4

In dry years, water availability can become a pressing issue for Swiss farmers. In 2018, many Swiss farmers struggled with dry periods during the summer. This led to the Swiss Farmers' Association formulating a package of measures, calling for stability in fodder supply in the event of extreme drought.5 This shows that while drought and water availability may not be Switzerland's biggest problem at the moment, it will certainly become more important in the future.

In our interview with Rahel Emmenegger, deputy managing director of the Swiss Grain Producers Association (SGPV), we learned that not all regions of Switzerland are equally prone to drought. According to her, especially the axis from the Lake Geneva area to the canton of Schaffhausen is at greater risk of drought than other areas of Switzerland. Also, certain alpine valleys, such as the Rhone Valley and the Engadine, are at higher risk of water scarcity. This shows that water availability is often a very local issue and that drought mitigation measures need to be implemented where they are most important.

Using symbiotic rhizobacteria, as we do, is very cheap and easy to implement. There are several potential implementations of RhyzUp that make use of existing technology, which means that using our rhizobacteria would be a very accessible way for farmers to combat water scarcity. This knowledge can be found on the Entrepreneurship and Implementation page in the Human Practices folder.

In addition, Rahel Emmenegger informed us that not all crops are equally sensitive to drought. This means that in Switzerland, crops that grow mainly during summer are more affected by water shortages than crops that are sown in fall. Specifically, drought is a threat to crops such as potatoes, many field-grown vegetables, grasses for fodder cultivation, and maize.

Since RhyzUp is compatible with a broad variety of crops, our project could benefit any crop, including the ones mentioned above that are most vulnerable to limited water availability. This adds to our contributions to target 2.4.

TARGET 2.4: 1.2) DROUGHT IN ETHIOPIA

Because Ethiopian agriculture is highly dependent on rainfall, and reduced rainfall drastically impacts food security, there have been several instances of drought causing humanitarian crises in the past years. Parts of southern Ethiopia are currently facing one of the most severe droughts on record, leading to huge deficiencies in crop and livestock production.6

Our interview with Dr. Mosisa Wakjira, a Wageningen-based researcher focusing on agrometeorology and its implications for sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia, provided valuable information for understanding the impact of rainfall variability on Ethiopian agriculture. Understanding water availability in an East African country helped us broaden our picture of drought and its impact on the local farming systems.

For the full interviews, take a look at the Interviews page of Human Practices.

Approximately 95% of Ethiopia's arable land is rain-fed. This means that crop production is almost entirely dependent on rainfall without the possibility of irrigation. Ethiopia can be broadly divided into two areas in terms of rainfall seasonality: unimodal rainfall regimes, characterized by one season of rainfall, and bimodal regimes, where rainfall usually occurs in two periods per year.

The implications for agriculture are different in the two regions. In unimodal rainfall regimes, where more water is usually available at once, the temporal distribution of rainfall and the growing season are critical for crop yield, while the amount of water available is not the main issue. In bimodal regimes, however, water availability can become a severe problem during the growing season, as total rainfall is split into two periods, leaving less water available for agriculture during both seasons. Crop yields in these regions therefore depend on the amount of water available and are highly sensitive to changes in rainfall. Farmers in bimodal regimes need to find ways to prevent water loss and improve water storage.7

The dependence of Ethiopian agriculture on rain shows that artificial irrigation can't be the solution to drought in agriculture around the world. Additional technologies and improved agricultural practices are needed to combat water scarcity. RhyzUp offers a promising solution as farmers would not need to invest in new equipment to apply our P. sp. IsoF strain and could use existing application methods. This facilitates working towards target 2.4. The exact means of implementation are described on the Entrepreneurship and Implementation page.

TARGET 2.4: 1.3) GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES OF DROUGHT

Worldwide, about 20% of all cropland is irrigated, while 80% is rainfed.

Irrigated agriculture accounts for about 40% of global crop production, while rainfed agriculture accounts for 60%. Per unit area, irrigated agriculture is much more productive than rainfed agriculture.8

Currently, much of the world's cropland is shifting from rainfed to irrigated, which has important implications for watersheds, water quality, and quantity9. 70% of freshwater is already used for agriculture, and the increasing popularity of irrigated agriculture is one of the main drivers of global freshwater demand. This poses a sustainability issue, as global freshwater resources are limited. For example, the freshwater consumption of Saudi-Arabia was more than nine times higher than their annual renewable freshwater resources in 2020.10

Rainfed agriculture, which currently accounts for more than half of all crop production, also faces new challenges due to climate change. As average temperatures rise, more water evaporates and is lost. Also, rainfed agriculture is way more vulnerable to drought than irrigated agriculture.

In addition, the seasonality of rainfall is projected to become more uncertain, which will also make farming more difficult and poses risks to crop yields. The increase in rainfall fluctuations was identified as a problem for agriculture by several of the stakeholders we spoke with: Rahel Emmenegger, Vivienne Oggier, and Fritz Meier. According to these experts, uncertainty about rainfall is a problem for farmers. In very wet years, fungal pathogens are more prevalent and lead to high yield losses, while in very dry years, agro-systems per se are less productive, and overfertilization may be an issue.

Since our engineered biofilm provides a solution to both pathogens see chapter “Target 2.4: 2) Plant Pathogens and Food Production”15 and water depletion11, there are benefits to using RhyzUp in both dry and wet years and helps with rainfall uncertainty.

Whether it is irrigated or rainfed agriculture, humanity must find a way to use water more efficiently. Our project, which aims to improve root water retention by overexpressing biofilm formation in Pseudomonas sp. IsoF, could help crops become more drought tolerant, thereby securing food supplies even in dry periods. This is an important approach, especially in times of water scarcity where artificial irrigation of fields cannot be a long-term solution in all parts of the world. All of the above shows how we're helping to achieve Target 2.4 of the SDGs.

TARGET 2.4: 2) PLANT PATHOGENS AND FOOD PRODUCTION

Every year, 20 to 40% of crops are lost to pests.12 Protecting crops from pests is critical to food security and poverty alleviation, which in turn ensures healthy lives.13

The ecology of many plant pathogens is highly dynamic. Climate change is causing changes in the distribution, reproduction, and severity of some of the pests that cause the most economic damage to agriculture.14 In addition, increased global trade may result in the more rapid spread of plant pathogens from one geographic area to another.15

The above arguments demonstrate the need for plant resistance to pathogens. Not only is resistance to specific pathogens critical for agriculture, but also a plant’s general pathogen resistance.

RhyzUp Biofilm seeks to address this issue by improving overall pathogen resistance in crops.16 In addition, Pseudomonas sp. IsoF has been shown to outcompete many root pathogens. With our engineered Pseudomonas, we hope to provide plants with better protection not only against native pathogens but also against future novel pathogens to ensure food security and contribute to target 2.4.

TARGET 2.4: 3) IMPROVING FERTILIZATION

Food production relies heavily on providing crops with adequate nutrients. As a result, fertilizer use has increased dramatically in recent decades, with major impacts on ecosystems worldwide.

If agricultural systems are to remain productive in the future without causing too much damage to ecosystems, fertilization must become more efficient.17

The situation in Switzerland is no different. Because of the surplus of nitrogen and phosphorus in Swiss agriculture, the Swiss Federal Council decided on April 13, 2022, to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus by 2030.18 According to Rahel Emmenegger, this reduction path for fertilizers has strong implications for farmers. Because many farmers are forced to use less fertilizer, the protein content of crops is lower than before, which in turn negatively affects the selling prices of these crops. Fertilization efficiency is crucial to ensure that nutrients actually end up in the crops being produced.

RhyzUp enhances a microbiome that supports nutrient accumulation around plant roots19, ensuring that more nutrients are delivered to the plant and less fertilizer is washed away. This is yet another way our project promotes food security while protecting the environment, addressing target 2.4 of the SDGs.

GOAL 3: GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING


Goal 3

54

Countries have not yet reached the UN under-five mortality target.20

The UN's third goal of sustainable development is to achieve good health and well-being for all people. In many priority areas, this goal has not yet been achieved.

Our project addresses several targets of the UN's third goal.

Target 3.2 is worded as follows: “By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1,000 live births and under-5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births.”20 This target is addressed through improved food security and nutrition.

Target 3.9 reads: “By 2030, substantially reduce the number of deaths and illnesses from hazardous chemicals and air, water and soil pollution and contamination”.21 This target is addressed by RhyzUp, as the symbiosis between our Pseudomonas strain and the plant promises to improve the plant's resistance to pathogens, potentially leading to a reduction in the use of chemical pesticides if properly implemented.

TARGET 3.2: NEONATAL MORTALITY AND FOOD SECURITY

Of the 200 countries or territories identified by the UN, 54 have not yet reached the under-five mortality target.19 The goal is to reduce under-five mortality to less than 25 deaths per 1,000 live births.22

UNICEF attributes about half of all under-five deaths to malnutrition. Without sufficient food and essential nutrients, children are at greater risk of infection, and infections are more severe than in well-nourished children.23

As explained in the previous chapter, “Goal 2: Zero Hunger” , RhyzUp increases food security and crop yields in three ways: by improving drought resistance, by improving overall resistance to pathogens, and by improving nutrient uptake and storage around plant roots. By increasing crop yield and ensuring plant survival, our project addresses UN Sustainability Target 3.2.

TARGET 3.9: REDUCTION OF PESTICIDES

According to the European Environment Agency, exposure to certain chemical pesticides has been linked not only to cancer and chronic heart, respiratory and neurological diseases but also to acute symptoms such as headaches, irritation, vomiting and skin rashes.24,25 In recent decades, environmental organizations and public health officials have been increasingly emphasizing the need to reduce the use of chemical pesticides in agriculture.

Pesticides are a topic of ogoing debate, and with yields and incomes at risk, farmers may not be able to consider alternatives to chemical pesticides, depending on the crops they grow and the methods they use. With this in mind, we as a team were convinced that developing alternatives to chemical pesticides is critical not only for biodiversity and the conservation of endangered species but also for human health and well-being. To better understand the options available to farmers in Switzerland today, we spoke with Fritz Meier, a local crop grower; Vivienne Oggier, who works as a crop protection and pest control advisor at the Agricultural Center in Saint Gall, Switzerland; and Rahel Emmenegger, who represents cereal, oilseed and protein crop growers. For the full interviews go see the Interviews page of Human Practices.

Fritz Meier said that in extreme cases, chemical pesticides are the only way to ensure the survival of his crops and prevent huge yield losses. At the same time, according to Vivienne Oggier, many pesticides are now subject to stricter regulations than they were a few years ago. In the field where Vivienne Oggier's partner grows beans, this has led to significant yield losses because the standard insecticide for seed treatment was banned and no alternatives are left.

Rahel Emmenegger noted that while there are many feasible efforts to reduce pesticides in cereals, this is hardly possible for some oilseeds, such as rapeseed. Her association, the Swiss Grain Producers Association, has supported research to find alternatives for rapeseed, but the results have not been very promising so far.

The stakeholder reports highlighted the importance of developing alternatives to pesticides, as there are currently insufficient alternatives for many crops. Because RhyzUp boosts plant immunity and promises to eliminate root pathogens in particular15, its use could reduce the need for pesticides. This is directly related to the UN Sustainable Development Goal 3.9.

GOAL 6: CLEAN WATER AND SANITATION


Goal 6

974.14%

Saudi-Arabia's freshwater withdrawals as a share of renewable internal resources in 2020.26

Agriculture is a major contributor to water quality problems due to the widespread use of pesticides and fertilizers. At the same time, agriculture suffers from the declining water quality, partly due to water scarcity, leading to the use of unsafe water.

Our project addresses the targets 6.3 and 6.4 of the SDGs:

Target 6.3 states: “By 2030, improve water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials, halving the proportion of untreated wastewater and substantially increasing recycling and safe reuse globally”.27 We address this target by reducing the use of pesticides and fertilizers.

Target 6.4 is described as follows: “By 2030, substantially increase water-use efficiency across all sectors and ensure sustainable withdrawals and supply of freshwater to address water scarcity and substantially reduce the number of people suffering from water scarcity”.26 RhyzUp makes a contribution to this target by improving water-use efficiency in agriculture.

TARGET 6.3: WATER POLLUTION OF FERTILIZERS AND PESTICIDES

The most significant contributors to water pollution from agriculture are excess nutrients that accumulate in water bodies and the buildup of nitrates and pesticides in rivers, lakes, and groundwater, which not only disrupt aquatic ecosystems but also pose health risks to humans and animals.28 For example, exposure to high levels of nitrates in drinking water can lead to methemoglobinemia, commonly known as "blue baby syndrome," which can be fatal for infants.29

The impact of fertilizer runoff on ecosystems is described in “Target 15.1: Reducing Eutrophication”.

Additionally, runoff water from agriculture often contains soluble fertilizers which can lead to contamination of lakes, streams and groundwater. Human exposure to pesticides through dermal contact or ingestion increases the risk of immunosuppression, hormone disruption, reduced intelligence, reproductive distortion and cancer.30 It is therefore of great interest to reduce the amount of pesticides used in agriculture.

Given the huge problem of polluted water, our team wanted to address this issue in our project. Since root biofilms have been shown to enhance nutrient uptake in plants19, we contribute to solutions for water pollution by reducing the excess nutrients that are washed away. With more efficient nutrient use, we also expect to reduce the need for fertilizers.

Also, through improved pathogen resistance and competition to naturally occurring root pathogens, RhyzUp leads to a decrease in the use of pesticides. In this way, our project directly contributes to the UN Sustainable Development Target 6.3.

TARGET 6.4: IMPROVING WATER-USE EFFICIENCY

In our interviews, we explored different types of irrigation systems used in Switzerland. At Gebrüder Meier, we discovered an innovative approach to the production of "hydro salads" using a closed irrigation system in their greenhouses, where the water is enriched with all the necessary nutrients. Residual water and nutrients are simply collected and used in the next cycle.

Even though greenhouse systems try to maximize water use efficiency, water is still a cost factor, according to Fritz Meier. Using RhyzUp to further improve water-use efficiency in greenhouses would, therefore, be beneficial for both sustainability and crop growers' bottom lines.

While Gebrüder Meier's greenhouses are a model example, and greenhouses have become increasingly important and efficient in recent decades31, agriculture still faces many challenges in implementing efficient and sustainable irrigation systems, and it is unrealistic for agriculture to completely switch to closed irrigation systems, as greenhouses represent only a small portion of the global land used for crop production. In addition, growing crops in greenhouses comes with higher capital costs and energy consumption that many growers worldwide could not afford.

Fortunately, our engineered Pseudomonas strain could also be used in the open field. According to Dr. Mosisa Wakjira, open field agriculture loses a lot of water to runoff. It could therefore greatly benefit from the improved water retention provided by our project.

Based on the facts described above, we can conclude that our project contributes to the UN Sustainable Development Target 6.4.

GOAL 13: CLIMATE ACTION


Goal 13

1/3

Of global greenhouse gas emissions are caused by agriculture and the food sector.32

The effects of climate change are becoming increasingly visible, and agriculture is no exception. Agriculture is not only severely affected by climate change, it is also partly responsible for anthropogenic climate change. About one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions come from agriculture. In addition to the methane produced by livestock, large amounts of nitrous oxide are produced in the fertilized soils of arable land.31 Approximately 70% of all nitrous oxide produced in agriculture comes from the use of fertilizers.33

By aiming at improving plant nutrient uptake19 and potentially reducing the amount of fertilizer needed, RhyzUp contributes to agricultural practices that produce less greenhouse gas emissions per unit of crop produced. In doing so, it tackles climate change, and therefore Goal 13, at its root.

TARGET 13.1: ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE

The 13th goal of sustainable development is not only about reducing greenhouse gas emissions as the main cause of climate change but also about adapting to the consequences of climate change. This is stated in target 13.1: “Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries”.34

By aiming at improving the resilience of crops to drought11, an example of a natural disaster, RhyzUp directly contributes to target 13.1 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

In addition, the strain of Pseudomonas we have developed promises to clear out troublesome root pathogens and improve overall plant resistance to pathogens. As the world's climate changes, so will the distribution of pathogens.16 It is difficult to predict which pathogens will be able to spread to which parts of the world, and each pest must be considered separately. In general, however, climate change will lead to longer growing seasons, which will allow many pathogens to increase their time to reproduce and spread. Pathogenic organisms that evolved in temperate and cold regions are generally exposed to temperatures cooler than their physiological optima. Rising global temperatures could, therefore, lead to increased pathogen pressure, particularly at higher latitudes.35

With novel plant pests being introduced into many regions of the world, in part due to global trade, and the ecology of many pathogens changing due to climate change, it is critical to improve the overall pathogen resistance of crops. Our project provides a means to do so and contributes to Target 13.1 of the SDGs.

GOAL 15: LIFE ON LAND


Goal 15

>500,000

Insect species could go extinct in the coming decades.36

The fifteenth goal of sustainable development is to protect ecosystems and halt the loss of biodiversity on land. Our project specifically contributes to three targets: Target 15.1, Target 15.5 and Target 15.8.

TARGET 15.1: REDUCING EUTROPHICATION

Target 15.1 is worded as follows: “By 2020, ensure the conservation, restoration and sustainable use of terrestrial and inland freshwater ecosystems and their services, in particular forests, wetlands, mountains and drylands, in line with obligations under international agreements.”37 Although the target year has passed, much more can be done to protect inland freshwater ecosystems.

Runoff of phosphate and nitrogen compounds from agricultural fertilizers increases eutrophication.38 Eutrophication is a process in which plants and algae grow excessively on surface waters. It reduces sunlight penetration to the lower layers of water, which reduces photosynthesis in submerged aquatic plants, leads to lower levels of dissolved oxygen, which kills aquatic organisms such as fish that serve as food for many other organisms, and leads to the production of toxins by cyanobacteria. Eutrophication is often associated with a loss of biodiversity.39

By reducing fertilizer runoff and the overall need for fertilizer through better nutrient storage around plant roots, our project, when properly implemented, contributes to the conservation of freshwater ecosystems. Therefore, it tackles Target 15.1 of the SDGs.

TARGET 15.5: MAINTAINING INSECT BIODIVERSITY

Target 15.5 is on the protection of biodiversity and natural habitats and is worded as follows: “Take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2020, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species.”37

Pesticide use has been identified as one of the main drivers of insect biodiversity loss, although it is now more regulated than ever in many parts of the world.40 Non-target organisms such as bees have been found to be exposed to pesticides in the EU, even in protected habitats.41 As noted in chapter "Target 3.9: Reduction of Pesticides", three of the stakeholders we spoke to emphasized that, in some cases, the use of pesticides is crucial to ensure crop yields. This shows that there is still a need for good alternatives to chemical pesticides.

By boosting plant immunity and suppressing a range of root pathogens, our P. sp. IsoF strain would reduce pesticide use and thus slow the loss of biodiversity, contributing to Target 15.5.

TARGET 15.8: PREVENTING OUR BACTERIA FROM BECOMING INVASIVE

While designing our project, it was important to us to ensure that our engineered bacteria would not invade environments where we did not want them. To do this, we included a xylose sensing mechanism to initiate biofilm production, a kill switch when the bacteria would not be in the presence of xylose as a root exudate, and modes of implementation, such as adding the bacteria to microgranular fertilizers that would limit the spatial distribution of our bacteria.

Thinking about the ecological consequences of the use of your projects is crucial. Reto Flückiger of Andermatt Biocontrol, a company that sells products based on rhizobacteria, told us that in order to be approved for commercial use, the bacteria must be endemic to the region of application.

Thinking about ways to ensure the biosafety of our project from the outset contributes to target 15.8 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This goal aims to prevent the spread of alien species in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

References

[1] Department of Economic and Social Affairs.(2024, September 15). Goal 2.

[2] FAO. (2024, September 15). First-ever global estimation of the impact of disasters on agriculture.

[3] FAO. (2021). The impact of disasters and crises on agriculture and food security: 2021

[4] Agroscope. (2023). Klimaresilienter Ackerbau 2035.

[5] SWI swissinfo.ch. (2018). Dürre schadet Landwirtschaft – Bauernverband fordert Soforthilfe.

[6] UNHCR. (2023, February, 28). The Horn of Africa Drought Situation Appeal (January - December 2023) - Ethiopia. ReliefWeb.

[7] Wakjira, M. T., Peleg, N., Anghileri, D., Molnar, D., Alamirew, T., Six, J., & Molnar, P. (2021). Rainfall seasonality and timing: implications for cereal crop production in Ethiopia. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 310, 108633.

[8] USAID. (2024, September 23). Enhancing rainfed agriculture | Archive - U.S. Agency for International Development.

[9] Oduor, B. O., Campo-Bescós, M. Á., Lana-Renault, N., Echarri, A. A., & Casalí, J. (2022). Evaluation of the Impact of Changing from Rainfed to Irrigated Agriculture in a Mediterranean Watershed in Spain. Agriculture, 13(1), 106.

[10] Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2024, February 27). Water use and stress. Our World in Data.

[11] Wang, D. C., Jiang, C. H., Zhang, L. N., Chen, L., Zhang, X. Y., & Guo, J. H. (2019). Wang, D. C., Jiang, C. H., Zhang, L. N., Chen, L., Zhang, X. Y., & Guo, J. H. (2019).

[12] Pathogens, precipitation and produce prices. (2021). Nature Climate Change, 11(8), 635.

[13] Rizzo, D.M., Lichtveld, M., Mazet, J. A. K., Togami, E., Miller, S. A. (2021, March 31). Plant Health and its effects on food safety and security in a One Health framework: four case studies. One Health Outlook.

[14] Lahlali, R., Taoussi, M., Laasli, S., Gachara, G., Ezzouggari, R., Belabess, Z., Aberkani, K., Assouguem, A., Meddich, A., Jarroudi, M. E., & Barka, E. A. (2024). Effects of climate change on plant pathogens and host-pathogen interactions. Crop and Environment, 3(3), 159–170.

[15] Gilardi, G., Garibaldi, A., Gullino, M. L. (2018). Emerging pathogens as a consequence of globalization and climate change: leafy vegetables as a case study. Phytopathologia mediterranea, 57(1), 146-152.

[16] Purtschert-Montenegro, G., Cárcamo-Oyarce, G., Pinto-Carbó, M., Agnoli, K., Bailly, A., & Eberl, L. (2022). Pseudomonas putida mediates bacterial killing, biofilm invasion and biocontrol with a type IVB secretion system. Nature Microbiology, 7(10), 1547–1557.

[17] Penuelas, J., Coello, F. & Sardans, J. (2023). A better use of fertilizers is needed for global food security and environmental sustainability. Agriculture & Food Security, 12, 5.

[18] Agripedia. (2024, September 25). Absenkpfad Nährstoffe.

[19] Pandit, A., Adholeya, A., Cahill, D., Brau, L., & Kochar, M. (2020). Microbial biofilms in nature: unlocking their potential for agricultural applications. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 129(2), 199–211.

[20] Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024, September 25). Goal 3.

[21] UN. (2024, September 25). Goal 3: Good health and well-being.

[22] UNICEF. (2024, March). Child survival and the SDGs.

[23] UNICEF. (2023, May). Malnutrition in Children.

[24] EEA. (2023, April) How pesticides impact human health and ecosystems in Europe.

[25] Pathak, V. M., Verma, V. K., Rawat, B. S., Kaur, B., Babu, N., Sharma, A., Dewali, S., Yadav, M., Kumari, R., Singh, S., Mohapatra, A., Pandey, V., Rana, N., & Cunill, J. M. (2022). Current status of pesticide effects on environment, human health and it's eco-friendly management as bioremediation: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in microbiology, 13, 962619.

[26] Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. (2024, September 6) Water Use and Stress. Our World in Data.

[27] Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024, September 25) Goal 6.

[28] Bijay-Singh, Craswell, E. (2021). Fertilizers and nitrate pollution of surface and ground water: an increasingly pervasive global problem. SN Appl. Sci. 3, 518.

[29] Minnesota Department of Health. (2018). Nitrate and Methemoglobinemia.

[30] Syafrudin, M., Kristanti, R. A., Yuniarto, A., Hadibarata, T., Rhee, J., Al-Onazi, W. A., Algarni, T. S., Almarri, A. H., & Al-Mohaimeed, A. M. (2021). Pesticides in Drinking Water-A Review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(2), 468.

[31] Pilkington, L. J., Messelink, G., Van Lenteren, J. C., & Mottee, K. L. (2009). “Protected Biological Control” – Biological pest management in the greenhouse industry. Biological Control, 52(3), 216–220.

[32] Hufstader, C. (2024). How will climate change affect agriculture. Oxfam.

[33] Tian, H., Davidson, E., Canadell, P., Louise Thompson, R. (2024) Food has a climate problem: Nitrous oxide emissions are accelerating with growing demand for fertilizer and meat – but there are solutions.The Conversation.

[34] Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024, September 28). Goal 13.

[35] Elad, Y., & Pertot, I. (2014). Climate Change Impacts on Plant Pathogens and Plant Diseases. Journal of Crop Improvement, 28(1), 99–139.

[36] Cardoso, P., Barton, P. S., Birkhofer, K., Chichorro, F., Deacon, C., Fartmann, T., Fukushima, C. S., Gaigher, R., Habel, J. C., Hallmann, C. A., Hill, M. J., Hochkirch, A., Kwak, M. L., Mammola, S., Noriega, J. A., Orfinger, A. B., Pedraza, F., Pryke, J. S., Roque, F. O., Samways, M. J. (2020). Scientists warning to humanity on insect extinctions. Biological Conservation, 242, 108426.

[37] Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024, September 28). Goal 15.

[38] Ayoub, A. T. (1999). Fertilizers and the environment. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 55(2), 117–121.

[39] Akinnawo, S. O. (2023) Eutrophication: Causes, consequences, physical, chemical and biological techniques for mitigation strategies. Environmental Challenges, 12, 100733.

[40] Brühl, C. A., & Zaller, J. G. (2019) Biodiversity decline as a consequence of an inappropriate environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 7.

[41] EAA. (2023) How pesticides impact human health and ecosystems in Europe.