-Project Description-

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

• | PLKLFC - iGEM 2024 | • | Prostate Cancer |

Prostate cancer has been one of the most commonplace diseases for humans. According to the Hong Kong Government, prostate cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the 4th most common cancer for both genders. (Cancer Online Resource Hub - Cancers in Hong Kong - Common Cancers in Hong Kong - Prostate Cancer, n.d.) This disease swept through different countries, in 2022, there were 1.47 million new cases of prostate cancer globally. Apart from the prevalence of prostate cancer, never should we overlook its lethality. The five-year survival rate for prostate cancer at stage four is merely 45%. (WCRF International, 2024) Unfortunately, a vast majority of patients do not even know that they have become a victim of prostate cancer until the later stages, due to the subtle symptoms and the high cost to receive screening. (How Much Does a Prostate Cancer Test Cost? - CostHelper, n.d.) In light of this, our team has decided to revolutionize prostate cancer treatment this year by inventing an innovative prostate cancer therapy and detection method which is far superior than our conventional alternatives, to continue our effort and passion in the oncological field in the past years.


History of prostate cancer

Since the last century, scientists have been developing ways to detect and treat prostate cancer.

  1. Important development of treatment of prostate cancer

Year

Event

1904

Hugh Hampton Young performed the first radical prostatectomy (Denmeade & Isaacs, 2002)

1945

Introduction of retropubic approach to prostatectomy by T. Millin (Millin, 1945)

1965

The first prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

1968

Discovery of androgen receptor (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

1971

The method for synthesizing luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) was discovered (Schally et al., 1971)

1981

Scientist found out that chemotherapeutic agent, estramustine, was useful for treating prostate cancer (Quinn et al., 2017)

1983

Introduction of a new nerve-sparing technique for radical prostatectomy by Walsh et al. (Denmeade & Isaacs, 2002)

1984

The first LHRH analogs approved for commercial use in prostate cancer (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

1989

Cyproterone (antiandrogen) acetate was approved by the FDA for the treatment of prostate cancer (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

1996

New chemotherapeutic, mitoxantrone, was introduced to treat mCRPC (metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer) (Tannock et al., 1996b)

2003

Abarelix, the first LHRH antagonist was approved by FDA (Moul, 2014)

2004-2022

Several drugs were being tested and developed (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)


  1. Important development of diagnosis of prostate cancer

1938

Discovery of first useful biomarker in prostate cancer diagnosis: Prostate-specific acid phosphate (PAP) (Gutman & Gutman, 1938 ; Kong & Byun, 2013b)

1966

Publication of Gleason histopathological grading system by Donal F. Gleason, which gradually replaced the preceding Broders classification system from 1926

(Epstein, 2018 ; Kweldam et al., 2018)

1973

Introduction of MRI imaging by Paul Lauterbur, Nobel laureate of 2003 (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

1979

Discovery of PSA (Rao et al., 2007 ; Wang et al., 1979)

1987

Stamey et al. find out that PSA is a useful biomarker in prostate cancer. (Stamey et al., 1987c)

1987

Discovery of PSMA by Horoszewicz et al. in the LNCaP cell line. (Horoszewicz et al., 1987)

1989

Introduction of systematic biopsy technique by Hodge et al. (Hodge et al., 1989)

1991

Catalona et al. first demonstrated that the PSA blood test could be used as a first-line screening test for prostate cancer (Catalona et al., 1991)

2005

The ISUP decided that Gleason scores below 5 should not be used, its use gradually declined (Epstein et al., 2005)

2010s

The performance of MRI prior to biopsy to reduce the number of needless biopsies (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

2012

PSMA PET/CT scans has started to be performed (Lehtonen & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, 2023)

2012

The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) released a version of the PI-RADS® classification system for prostate MRI lesions (Barentsz et al., 2012)

2014

ISUP conference proposed a new classification system, which reclassified Gleason scores 6-10 into corresponding ISUP grade groups 1-5

(Epstein et al., 2016)


Prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer in Hong Kong and the fourth most common cancer in the world (WCRF International, 2024), affecting one in seven men. Currently, there are a few ways to detect prostate cancer.

Method

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test

Digital rectal examination (DRE)

Fine Needle biopsy

Description

It is a blood test that detects prostate cancer by measuring the amount of PSA in the blood


A high level of PSA in the patient’s blood may indicate certain abnormalities, including prostate cancer.

The doctor will do further investigations to find out whether the patient has prostate cancer or not.

(Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test, 2022)

The doctor will insert a gloved and lubricated finger into the patient’s rectum to feel for any bumps or hard areas on the prostate, which may be a sign of prostate cancer (Prostate Cancer Screening; Digital Rectal Examination, n.d.)

It is a procedure to remove a piece of tissue or a sample of cells from the prostate


It inserts a special needle through the skin to collect cells from a suspicious area


The specimen will be analyzed in a laboratory to determine whether cancer cells are present

(How Much Does a Prostate Biopsy Cost?, n.d.)

Advantages

  1. Can find early signs of prostate cancer for earlier treatment
  2. Can be done with a simple and widely available blood test

(Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test, 2022)

  1. Just take a few minutes
  2. No anesthesia is needed

(Ying et al., 2023)

  1. Less invasive than surgical biopsies and reduces the risk of complications and post-procedure discomfort

Disadvantages

  1. It may not be accurate as there are other factors (e.g. BPH) causing elevated PSA levels, and not all prostate cancer patients produce much PSA.

  2. Cannot identify between slow-growing and fast-growing cancers

  3. Causes unnecessary stress and anxiety for slow-growing prostate cancer patient

(Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test, 2022)

  1. It is less effective than the PSA blood test

  2. Causes discomfort and pain

  3. Improper examination may cause the injury of patient’s rectal wall

(Prostate Cancer Screening; Digital Rectal Examination, n.d.)

  1. Causes minor bleeding

  2. Infection may rarely occur

  3. A high rate of false negative results

(Prostate Cancer Screenings | Misleading Results | Vista Urology, n.d.)

Accuracy

Around 25%

(Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test, 2022)

Around 63% (Ying et al., 2023)

Around 82% (Narayan et al., 1989) with a false negative rate of 30%-40%

Cost

At-home:USD $20-$50


At-hospital:USD$120 or more


(How Much Does a Prostate Cancer Test Cost? - CostHelper, n.d.-b)



USD $551


(Prostate Cancer Screening; Digital Rectal Examination, n.d.)

USD $407-$2,585

(How Much Does a Prostate Biopsy Cost?, n.d.)


Besides having different detection methods, there are also various treatments for different stages of prostate cancer.

Treatments

Radical Prostatectomy

External Beam Radiation

Cryotherapy

Description

It removes part of the prostate or the entire prostate and some of the tissue around it


It can be done through an incision made in the wall of the lower abdomen or in the perineum

It uses high-energy beams such as X-rays or protons to kill cancer cells

It freezes cancer cells and destroys them.



Advantages

  1. Most of the prostate cancer cells can be removed

  2. It allows the pathologist to assess the cancer's aggressiveness more accurately

  3. A high success rate

  4. Extended lifespan compared with watchful waiting
  1. It can destroy cancer cells or prevent them from spreading

  2. It can act as a complement to other cancer treatments

  3. It is painless
  1. Improved preservation of surrounding tissue

  2. A less invasive treatment

Disadvantages

  1. Causes long-term problems such as erectile dysfunction and incontinence

  2. Will not be able to have children naturally or ejaculate after surgery
  1. May cause incontinence or frequent urination

  2. Cause tenderness and inflammation at the treatment site
  1. May cause erectile dysfunction and urinary retention


10-year survival rate

88.9% (Kibel et al., 2012)

82.6% (Kibel et al., 2012)

90.5%

(Cheetham et al., 2010)

Cost

Around USD$17,226 (Burkhardt et al., 2002)

Around USD $14,048 (Burkhardt et al., 2002)

Around USD $11,215

(UCLA Researchers Find a Wide Variation in Costs to Treat Low-risk Prostate Cancer, 2015)


In this project, we are investigating a method to detect and kill prostate cancer cells in a patient's body. Our project will include two medications, one can only detect PSMA-positive cancer cells, the other one can detect and kill prostate cancer cells.

  1. Medication for detecting PSMA-positive cancer cells

According to a recent research, more than 80% of patients with prostate cancer are having the symptom of high PSMA expression. (Hope et al., 2017; Minner et al., 2010) This has inspired us to design a plasmid that can detect PSMA-positive prostate cancer cells in the patient’s body. Based on the recent research, PSMA is usually overexpressed in prostate cancer (Tayara et al., 2024) and it can be used to determine the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (Bravaccini et al., 2018; Minner et al., 2010). Therefore, when the plasmid is injected into the patient’s prostate gland, it is expressed and produces a fluorescent protein called gaussia luciferase (Gluc). By determining the light intensity of the fluorescent protein in the patient’s urine, PSMA-positive prostate cancer cells can be detected.

  1. Medication for detecting and killing prostate cancer cells

In the plasmid, there are not only genes for detecting prostate cancer, there is also a gene for killing the prostate cancer cells in advance. The gene we inserted into the plasmid will produce BAX, which is a protein that triggers apoptosis of cells. Therefore, after the plasmid is released into the cell, not only can it cause the cell to express a fluorescent protein and release it to the patient’s urine for detection, it can also trigger the cell to undergo apoptosis and kill the cancer cell.


There are several components we have chosen for the whole medication: PSMA promoter, probasin promoter, Gluc protein, and BAX

PSMA promoter is a promoter that will be activated only when it is located in an environment with a high PSMA level. It has transcriptional activity in PSMA(+) cell lines and no activity in PSMA(-) cell lines (Zeng et al., 2005b).

Probasin (PB) promoter is a promoter that is highly prostate specific (Lowe et al., 2001) and will only be activated when it is located in the prostate gland. It allows us to ensure the plasmid is expressed in PSMA-positive prostate cancer cells.

Gaussia luciferase, Gluc, is a bioluminescent enzyme that will emit blue light with a wavelength of 480 nm under certain reactions (Tannous & Teng, 2011). It will be expressed under a high PSMA level at the prostate gland and be detected in the patient’s urine with the help of a plate reader. Using Gluc in our project but not GFP, a common fluorescent protein, is because GFP is cytotoxic and will cause cell death (Ansari et al., 2016).

BAX, also known as Bcl-2-like protein 4, is a crucial component in the regulation of apoptosis, or programmed cell death. The expression of BAX by the plasmid will promote the prostate cancer cells to undergo apoptosis (Carpenter & Brady, 2023).


First of all, we have designed a plasmid that can detect PSMA-positive prostate cancer cells. The plasmid consists of two parts, the PSMA promoter and the gene that can express Gluc. When the plasmid is located at the prostate gland, the PSMA promoter will be activated and Gluc will be expressed. If Gluc protein is detected in the patient’s urine, it indicates the presence of prostate cancer cells in the patient’s prostate gland.

Based on the plasmid for the detection, we have further made some changes to allow the plasmid to have another function, killing the prostate cancer cells. We have changed the promoter to probasin promoter, and added another gene that can express BAX into the plasmid. When the plasmid is expressed in the prostate gland, not only will Gluc be expressed and detected by a plate reader in the patient’s urine, but BAX will also be expressed to trigger the prostate cancer cells to undergo apoptosis, which is observable in cell line by checking the cell viability (Lowe et al., 2001).

Figure 1: Medication for detecting PSMA-Positive cancer cells

Figure 2: Medication in normal somatic cells

Figure 3: Medication for detecting and killing cancer cells


The strength of project is called PCAs, which is the abbreviation for prostate cancers


Through our product, prostate cancer patients would not need to suffer the many side effects of current treatments like radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy or chemotherapy. The side effects of these traditional treating methods include hair loss, erectile dysfunction and urinary retention, while patients using our product will only need to endure some wound pain.


Through intravenous injection, our medication can be administered anywhere, even in clinics or medical tents in less developed countries. The detection of prostate cancer will no longer be limited to hospitals, and the treatment of prostate cancer will not need to take place in an operating theatre or in a room with an enormous radiotherapy device, which is very convenient for patients.


The current methods for the detection of prostate cancer costs several hundred US dollars, and the cost for treatment is even much more expensive. Our medication allows prostate cancer patients to detect and kill prostate cancer cells with only a dosage or two, with each dosage costing less than a hundred US dollars. This price is affordable to most of the patients in the world, even for those who are living in less developed countries.


Our medication allows patients to obtain the result in only a short period of time, which is mostly less than an hour. The patients can detect prostate cancer by collecting their urine after injecting the medication, and measure the light intensity of Gluc in their urine through a simple and quick reaction. The whole process only takes place for less than an hour, which is very fast when compared to the current detection methods.The strength of project is called PCAs, which is the abbreviation for prostate cancers

Killing the prostate cancer cells is also very speedy, as it only takes place after gaussia luciferase and BAX are expressed in the patient’s cancer cells. The whole process only lasts for less than an hour, which is very quick when compared to the current methods that lasts for several hours.

Killing the prostate cancer cells is also very speedy, as it only takes place after gaussia luciferase and BAX are expressed in the patient’s cancer cells. The whole process only lasts for less than an hour, which is very quick when compared to the current methods that lasts for several hours.


The plasmid that we are designing is only part of the medication. In the future, we will try to develop a delivery system that can deliver the plasmid to the patient’s body through a polymer and an aptamer, which has been proposed by Tai et al. (Tai et al., 2020). We hope to deliver the medication to the patient’s prostate gland through intramuscular injection in the future.

Moreover, we are just simulating the fate of plasmids with a cell line, which cannot completely reveal the real effect of them in the human body. Therefore, we may try to apply the medication to mammals like rats, in order to understand the effect of plasmids on the human body more clearly.

Although inventing the medication is the major goal of our project, we also want to help prostate cancer patients as soon as possible. Therefore, our next step is to apply it to real patients. In the future, we may collaborate with universities to verify the function of our medication and apply it to real patients under the government’s approval. We may also collaborate with enterprises in order to make the medication become a real product in the market in the foreseeable future.

    Reference

  • [1] Cancer Online Resource Hub - Cancers in Hong Kong - Common cancers in Hong Kong - Prostate cancer. (n.d.). https://www.cancer.gov.hk/en/hong_kong_cancer/common_cancers_in_hong_kong/prostate_cancer.html
  • [2] WCRF International. (2024, June 26). Prostate cancer statistics | World Cancer Research Fund International. https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/prostate-cancer-statistics/
  • [3] How much does a prostate cancer test cost? - CostHelper. (n.d.-b). CostHelper. https://health.costhelper.com/prostate-cancer.html
  • [4] Prostate-Specific antigen (PSA) test. (2022b, March 11). Cancer.gov. https://www.cancer.gov/types/prostate/psa-fact-sheet
  • [5] Ying, Y., He, W., Xiong, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, M., Chen, Q., Hua, M., Zeng, S., & Xu, C. (2023). Value of digital rectal examination in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective cohort analysis study. Translational Andrology and Urology, 12(11), 1666–1672. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-371
  • [6] Turquoise Health. (n.d.). Prostate Cancer Screening; digital rectal examination. Retrieved August 16, 2024, from https://turquoise.health/services/prostate-cancer-screening-digital-rectal-examination/
  • [7] How much does a prostate biopsy cost? (n.d.). Retrieved August 16, 2024, from https://help.amino.com/hc/en-us/articles/360009761954-How-much-does-a-prostate-biopsy-cost
  • [8] Prostate Cancer Screenings | Misleading Results | Vista Urology. (n.d.). Vista Urology. https://www.vistaurology.com/blog/prostate-cancer-screening-misleading-results-overtreatment-(part-3-of-3)-35765
  • [9] Narayan, P., Jajodia, P., Stein, R., & Tanagho, E. A. (1989). A comparison of fine needle aspiration and core biopsy in diagnosis and preoperative grading of prostate cancer. The Journal of Urology, 141(3 Part 1), 560–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40894-9
  • [10] UCLA researchers find a wide variation in costs to treat low-risk prostate cancer. (2015, November 2). UCLA Health. https://www.uclahealth.org/news/release/ucla-researchers-find-a-wide-variation-in-costs-to-treat-low-risk-prostate-cancer
  • [11] Kibel, A. S., Ciezki, J. P., Klein, E. A., Reddy, C. A., Lubahn, J. D., Haslag-Minoff, J., Deasy, J. O., Michalski, J. M., Kallogjeri, D., Piccirillo, J. F., Rabah, D. M., Yu, C., Kattan, M. W., & Stephenson, A. J. (2012). Survival among men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy in the prostate specific antigen Era. The Journal of Urology, 187(4), 1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.084
  • [12] Burkhardt, J. H., Litwin, M. S., Rose, C. M., Correa, R. J., Sunshine, J. H., Hogan, C., & Hayman, J. A. (2002). Comparing the costs of radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy for the initial treatment of Early-Stage prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(12), 2869–2875. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.11.136
  • [13] Tai, Z., Ma, J., Ding, J., Pan, H., Chai, R., Zhu, C., Cui, Z., Chen, Z., & Zhu, Q. (2020b). Aptamer-Functionalized Dendrimer Delivery of Plasmid-Encoding lncRNA MEG3 Enhances Gene Therapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. International Journal of Nanomedicine, Volume 15, 10305–10320. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s282107
  • [14] Tayara, O., Poletajew, S., Malewski, W., Kunikowska, J., Pełka, K., Kryst, P., & Nyk, Ł. (2024). Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Positron Emission Tomography-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen. Current Oncology, 31(8), 4165–4177. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080311
  • [15] Bravaccini, S., Puccetti, M., Bocchini, M., Ravaioli, S., Celli, M., Scarpi, E., De Giorgi, U., Tumedei, M. M., Raulli, G., Cardinale, L., & Paganelli, G. (2018). PSMA expression: a potential ally for the pathologist in prostate cancer diagnosis. Scientific Reports, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22594-1
  • [16] Ansari, A. M., Ahmed, A. K., Matsangos, A. E., Lay, F., Born, L. J., Marti, G., Harmon, J. W., & Sun, Z. (2016). Cellular GFP toxicity and Immunogenicity: Potential confounders in in vivo cell tracking experiments. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, 12(5), 553–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-016-9670-8
  • [17] Lowe, S., Rubinchik, S., Honda, T., McDonnell, T., Dong, J., & Norris, J. (2001). Prostate-specific expression of Bax delivered by an adenoviral vector induces apoptosis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Gene Therapy, 8(18), 1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301531
  • [18] Tannous, B. A., & Teng, J. (2011). Secreted blood reporters: Insights and applications. Biotechnology Advances, 29(6), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.021
  • [19] Carpenter, R., & Brady, M. F. (2023, January 30). BAX gene. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555927/
  • [20] Zeng, H., Wu, Q., Li, H., Wei, Q., Lu, Y., Li, X., Wang, F., Zhao, F., Ding, Z., & Yang, Y. (2005). Construction of Prostate‐Specific expressed recombinant plasmids with high transcriptional activity of Prostate‐Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Promoter/Enhancer. Andrology, 26(2), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2005.tb01088.x
  • [21] Hope, T. A., Aggarwal, R., Chee, B., Tao, D., Greene, K. L., Cooperberg, M. R., Feng, F., Chang, A., Ryan, C. J., Small, E. J., & Carroll, P. R. (2017). Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on Management in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 58(12), 1956–1961. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.192476
  • [22] Minner, S., Wittmer, C., Graefen, M., Salomon, G., Steuber, T., Haese, A., Huland, H., Bokemeyer, C., Yekebas, E., Dierlamm, J., Balabanov, S., Kilic, E., Wilczak, W., Simon, R., Sauter, G., & Schlomm, T. (2010). High level PSMA expression is associated with early psa recurrence in surgically treated prostate cancer. The Prostate, 71(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.21241
  • [23] Lehtonen, M., & Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. (2023). The past and present of prostate cancer and its treatment and diagnostics: A historical review. SAGE Open Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121231216837
  • [24] Catalona, W. J., Smith, D. S., Ratliff, T. L., Dodds, K. M., Coplen, D. E., Yuan, J. J., Petros, J. A., & Andriole, G. L. (1991). Measurement of Prostate-Specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(17), 1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199104253241702
  • [25] Denmeade, S. R., & Isaacs, J. T. (2002). A history of prostate cancer treatment. Nature Reviews. Cancer, 2(5), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc801
  • [26] Millin, T. (1945). RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY a NEW EXTRAVESICAL TECHNIQUE. The Lancet, 246(6379), 693–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(45)91030-0
  • [27] Schally, A. V., Kastin, A. J., & Arimura, A. (1971). Hypothalamic Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and luteinizing Hormone (LH)-Regulating hormone: structure, physiology, and clinical studies. Fertility and Sterility, 22(11), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38580-6
  • [28] Quinn, D., Sandler, H., Horvath, L., Goldkorn, A., & Eastham, J. (2017). The evolution of chemotherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Annals of Oncology, 28(11), 2658–2669. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx348
  • [29] Epstein, J. I., Egevad, L., Amin, M. B., Delahunt, B., Srigley, J. R., Humphrey, P. A., & Grading Committee. (2016). The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. The American journal of surgical pathology, 40(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000530
  • [30] Tannock, I. F., Osoba, D., Stockler, M. R., Ernst, D. S., Neville, A. J., Moore, M. J., Armitage, G. R., Wilson, J. J., Venner, P. M., Coppin, C. M., & Murphy, K. C. (1996b). Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 14(6), 1756–1764. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1996.14.6.1756
  • [31] Moul, J. W. (2014). Utility of LHRH antagonists for advanced prostate cancer. PubMed, 21(2 Supp 1), 22–27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24775720
  • [32] Gutman, A. B., & Gutman, E. B. (1938). AN “ ACID ” PHOSPHATASE OCCURRING IN THE SERUM OF PATIENTS WITH METASTASIZING CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE GLAND. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 17(4), 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci100974
  • [33] Kong, H. Y., & Byun, J. (2013b). Emerging roles of human prostatic acid phosphatase. Biomolecules & Therapeutics, 21(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2012.095
  • [34] Epstein, J. I. (2018). Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system. Modern Pathology, 31, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2017.133
  • [35] Kweldam, C. F., Van Leenders, G. J., & Van Der Kwast, T. (2018). Grading of prostate cancer: a work in progress. Histopathology, 74(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13767
  • [36] Epstein, J. I., Allsbrook Jr, W. C., Amin, M. B., Egevad, L. L., & ISUP Grading Committee. (2005). The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. The American journal of surgical pathology, 29(9), 1228-1242. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1
  • [37] Wang, M. C., Valenzuela, L. A., Murphy, G. P., & Chu, T. M. (1979). Purification of a human prostate specific antigen. Investigative urology, 17(2), 159-163.
  • [38] Rao, A. R., Motiwala, H. G., & Karim, O. M. (2007). The discovery of prostate‐specific antigen. BJU International, 101(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07138.x
  • [39] Stamey, T. A., Yang, N., Hay, A. R., McNeal, J. E., Freiha, F. S., & Redwine, E. (1987c). Prostate-Specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. New England Journal of Medicine, 317(15), 909–916. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198710083171501
  • [40] Horoszewicz, J. S., Kawinski, E. M. G. P., & Murphy, G. P. (1987). Monoclonal antibodies to a new antigenic marker in epithelial prostatic cells and serum of prostatic cancer patients. Anticancer research, 7(5B), 927-935.
  • [41] Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., Terris, M. K., & Stamey, T. A. (1989). Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. The Journal of Urology, 142(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38664-0
  • [42] Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P., Verma, S., Villeirs, G., Rouviere, O., Logager, V., & Fütterer, J. J. (2012). ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. European Radiology, 22(4), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
arrow_upward