Red Rot of Sugarcane
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a monocotyledon and member of the family
Poaceae, tribe Andropogoneae. Sugarcane contributes approximately 80% of
the global sugar requirement[1]. Red rot is one of the most serious and
oldest diseases of Sugarcane. The first appearance of the disease was in
Java in 1893. Currently, the disease occurs in all the sugarcane-growing
continents, and it is reported in 77 countries, including India,
Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Myanmar, Nepal, and Vietnam[2].
Sucrose content, the main economic produce, was reduced in the range of
31%–75% at different infection levels[3]. Red rot–affected canes show a
decline of 29 to 83% in cane weight and 24 to 90% in juice extraction
[4].
Sugarcane has some red rot resistant varieties. However, in countries,
especially in Asia, varietal breakdown to red rot has caused severe
epiphytotics, by which the resistant varieties failed in the field at
regular intervals. New pathogenic strains with higher virulence were
found responsible for the varietal breakdown in Sugarcane. Extensive
cultivation of a single variety over large areas led to extensive crop
damage due to the vertifolia effect in different decades in India. The
current epiphytotic on the ruling variety Co0238 has caused a loss of
more than one billion US dollars to India in the 2020-21 season[1].
Who causes Red Rot in Sugarcane?
Colletotrichum falcatum is a fungal pathogen that causes red rot disease
in Sugarcane. The morphology of the fungus includes conidia that are
crescent-shaped or falcate (curved), which is why the species name is
falcatum, conidiophores which produce conidia in clusters, and sclerotia
which are hard, dark-coloured masses that help the fungus survive in
unfavourable conditions. This pathogen is a facultative parasite. It
occurs in anamorphic and teleomorphic forms, but the amorphic stage,
which infects standing canes, is the most important stage. The
distinctive morphological and cultural characteristics of C. Falcatum
include the development of acervuli with setae, the presence or absence
of teleomorph, the pinkish appearance of the colony, sporulation and
growth rate[5].
Diversity in virulence within pathotypes revealed that a red rot
pathogen undergoes adaptive changes in host cultivars. It was reported
that isolates are virulent in susceptible varieties but not in resistant
and moderately susceptible varieties[6]. Virulence frequencies of
isolates range from 21.3–40% on mildly susceptible varieties compared
with 62.9–97.9% on susceptible varieties. This suggests that C. falcatum
isolates differ in their host infectivity. Thus, it is very important to
identify the extent of pathogen diversity and the way infection occurs
to develop effective disease control and planting management [5].
What happened when C. falcatum started infecting in fields?
Of the 5.2 M ha land in cultivation in India 2.6 M ha (50%) area of
sugarcane production is done in the state Uttar Pradesh(UP). The
sugarcane variety Co 0238 grown in UP, known for its moderate resistance
to disease, saw a significant rise in popularity, with its cultivation
area increasing from 19.8% in 2015-16 to 86.67% in 2020-21. However,
during this same period, the incidence of Red Rot in Co 0238 escalated
dramatically, from 5% in 2015-16 to 100% by 2020-21. The rapid spread of
this disease was primarily attributed to infected soil and setts used in
farmer fields.
CoS8436 was a popular moderately disease-resistant variant of Sugarcane
in Bihar, India. The cane production dipped almost 1/3rd over 3 seasons
of Sugarcane Production as Variety CoS8436 succumbed to Red Rot.
Growth and Transmission
Many sources of inoculum are involved in the transmission of Red Rot. C.
falcatum is primarily spread through soil and diseased setts, whereas
secondary distribution is through irrigation water, rainfall splashing,
midrib lesion dew brushing, wind dispersal and other field vectors[7].
The relative importance of how inoculum is spread depends on the time of
the year and the conditions under which the cane grows; in monsoon
season, the secondary distribution will be active.
PLANT-BASED TRANSMISSION
The pathogen infects stalks through nodes, leaf scars, growth rings,
root primordial and buds. The pathogen enters the nodes of a sugarcane
plant through the inner epidermis of the lower part of the leaf sheath
of this plant. In an unfavourable condition, the fungus produces
appressoria on the rind and leaves. Late in the season, the infection
restarts with the placement of healthy plants.
SOIL-BASED TRANSMISSION
During soil-borne transmission, latent fungal structures, namely
appressoria, dense-walled hyphae chlamydospores, and setae play
important roles in the dispersal of disease [8]. Colletotrichum falcatum
thrives on unhealthy stalks or stubble fragments. Although C. falcatum
is not a definite soil-inhabitant pathogen, there is enough evidence to
suggest that fungal propagules are perpetuated by debris-borne inoculum
[9].
Red Rot disease manifests in four distinct forms depending on the part
of the plant affected:
Tiller Red Rot: Appears during the tillering stage, identified by
stunted plant growth, dry straw-colored leaves, and overall poor plant
health.
Lamina Red Rot: This type causes the lamina (leaf blade) to turn
straw-colored in the middle, with dark reddish-brown edges. The leaves
eventually split and hang at the lesion sites.
Mid Rib Red Rot: This form is characterized by a reddening of the midrib
(central vein of the leaf), with the red color progressing throughout
the entire midrib.
Stem Red Rot: Occurs in the stalk at later stages, where the internal
tissues show alternating red and white patches with an alcoholic scent.
The infected stalks often weaken and separate easily at the nodes.
LIFE CYCLE OF C. falcatum[12]
1. Initial Infection (0-3 days): The pathogen typically enters through
wounds or natural openings in the plant, which aligns with the early
infection phase.
2. Pathogen Growth and Colonization (3-10 days): After entry, the fungus
grows and disrupts vascular bundles, causing nutrient flow issues.
3. Inoculum Build-up (10-16 days): This is when the fungus multiplies
and builds up spores (inoculum), essential for further spreading within
the field.
4. Symptom Appearance (16-21 days): The yellowing of leaves and internal
reddish streaks in the stalk are common symptoms during this stage.
5. Red Discoloration (21-30 days): The characteristic red discoloration
of internal tissues becomes more severe, along with tissue rotting.
6. Plant Decline and Death (30-45 days): Severe infections lead to a
rapid decline in plant health, including extensive wilting and tissue
breakdown, often resulting in plant death if left unmanaged.
Current Methods of Diagnosis
The most important requirement in any good disease management practice
is the accurate identification of the pathogen.
1. Traditional Methods: Traditional methods for detecting plant diseases
involve pathogen isolation and inoculation tests. Colletotrichum species
are primarily identified based on morphological traits such as mycelial
development, color, texture, and conidia size. While conidia can be
observed under a microscope, the accuracy of this approach relies
heavily on the experience of the examiner. These phenotypic methods are
time-consuming and require skilled personnel. Additionally, overlapping
characteristics within species make morphological identification
insufficient. Pathogenicity tests are also used but take a long time and
are influenced by environmental factors.
2. Serological Methods: Serological methods, such as ELISA, are used to
detect Colletotrichum Falcatum, the red rot fungus in Sugarcane.
Viswanathan et al. demonstrated that ELISA could quantify pathogen
colonization and classify host reactions as resistant, moderately
resistant, or susceptible based on fungal spread in cane stalks[10].
Other techniques like dot immune binding assay (DIBA) and western
blotting have also been employed for detection. Specific polyclonal
antibodies were raised against C. Falcatum with high affinity. However,
serological tests risk false positives due to cross-reactivity with
plant debris or unrelated organisms.
3. Image Processing Methods: Image processing techniques, including
computer vision-based algorithms, have been applied to detect diseases
like red rot in Sugarcane, involving steps like image acquisition,
preprocessing, and segmentation. Fluorescence imaging captures
chlorophyll fluorescence, providing insights into plant responses to
pathogens but is limited in field applications. Thermography tracks
temperature variations in plant leaves to identify diseases but
struggles with environmental sensitivity and disease differentiation.
Hyperspectral imagery captures plant health data across wavelengths,
successfully detecting orange rust in Sugarcane, though further research
is needed for broader applications. However, leaf size variability and
rapid evaporation pose challenges.
1. DNA/RNA-Based Affinity Biosensor A new DNA-based biosensor has been
developed for early pathogen identification, detecting diseases before
visible symptoms. It relies on specific nucleic acid hybridization to
rapidly identify genetic and infectious diseases. The most common assay
uses single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) on electrodes with electroactive
markers to test hybridization with target DNA. While promising, DNA
biosensors require PCR amplification and small nucleic acid samples.
However, drawbacks include high costs, single-target synthesis, and
limitations in real-time detection.
2. Molecular Methods Molecular approaches have become essential for
identifying Colletotrichum species due to limitations of traditional
methods, such as environmental influences and overlapping phenotypes.
Techniques like sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region,
combined with genes like actin and beta-tubulin, improve accuracy in
fungal detection. Inter-simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers are useful
for genetic diversity analysis and pathogen population dynamics. The
draft genome of C. Falcatum is around 48.16 Mb, with numerous genes
linked to virulence. Molecular techniques, like RNA silencing of the
PKS1 gene and GFP tagging, offer insights into pathogen interactions,
although they are more costly and require specific primers for DNA
amplification.
Colletotrichum Falcatum nucleotide sequences are available in the public
domain database. Embed this table in an Image Format like in [5].
Why is there a need for a new diagnosis method?
There is a growing need for rapid, accurate, and user-friendly
diagnostic methods, particularly for agricultural pathogens like
Colletotrichum Falcatum, which causes red rot in Sugarcane, given the
elevated virulence and frequent epiphytotics. Traditional diagnostic
methods are time-consuming, require specialized equipment and skilled
personnel, and are often impractical for field use. Developing a
point-of-care (PoC) diagnostic tool that leverages the specificity of
ITS rDNA identification combined with a home-friendly iSPR(Surface
Plasmon Resonance) system can provide early, reliable detection of
pathogens at the molecular level. This approach is not only faster and
more accurate but also more accessible, enabling real-time monitoring
and management of crop diseases, which is crucial for improving yield
and reducing losses in agricultural systems.
References
1. Viswanathan, R. (2021). Red Rot of sugarcane ( Colletotrichum
Falcatum Went). In CABI Reviews. CABI Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1079/pavsnnr202116023
2. Singh RP, Lal S. Red rot. In: Rott P, Bailey RA, Comstock JC, Croft
BJ, Saumtally AS, editors. A guide to sugarcane diseases. Montpellier,
France: CIRAD/ISSCT; 2000. p. 153–8.
3. Munir A, Roshan A, Fasihi SD. Effect of different infection levels of
red rot of Sugarcane on cane weight and juice quality. Journal of
Agricultural Research 1986;24:129–31.
4. Viswanathan R. Plant disease: red rot of Sugarcane. New Delhi, India:
Anmol Publications Pvt Ltd; 2010.
5. Hossain, M. I., Ahmad, K., Siddiqui, Y., Saad, N., Rahman, Z.,
Haruna, A. O., & Bejo, S. K. (2020). Current and Prospective Strategies
on Detecting and Managing Colletotrichumfalcatum Causing Red Rot of
Sugarcane. In Agronomy (Vol. 10, Issue 9, p. 1253). MDPI
AG.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091253
6. Viswanathan, R.; Padmanaban, P.; Selvakumar, R. Emergence of New
Pathogenic Variants in Colletotrichum Falcatum, Stalk Infecting
Ascomycete in Sugarcane: Role of Host Varieties. Sugar Tech 2019, 22,
473–484. [[Google
Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Emergence+of+New+Pathogenic+Variants+in+Colletotrichum+falcatum,+Stalk+Infecting+Ascomycete+in+Sugarcane:+Role+of+Host+Varieties&author=Viswanathan,+R.&author=Padmanaban,+P.&author=Selvakumar,+R.&publication_year=2019&journal=Sugar+Tech&volume=22&pages=473%E2%80%93484&doi=10.1007/s12355-019-00780-3)]
[[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00780-3)]
7. Hossain, M. I., Ahmad, K., Siddiqui, Y., Saad, N., Rahman, Z.,
Haruna, A. O., & Bejo, S. K. (2020). Current and Prospective Strategies
on Detecting and Managing Colletotrichumfalcatum Causing Red Rot of
Sugarcane. In Agronomy (Vol. 10, Issue 9, p. 1253). MDPI
AG.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091253
8. Hassan, M.N.; Afghan, S.; Hafeez, F.Y. Suppression of red rot caused
by Colletotrichum Falcatum on sugarcane plants using plant
growth-promoting rhizobacteria. BioControl *2010, *55, 531–542.
[[*Google
Scholar*](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Suppression+of+red+rot+caused+by+Colletotrichum+falcatum+on+sugarcane+plants+using+plant+growth-promotin+grhizobacteria&author=Hassan,+M.N.&author=Afghan,+S.&author=Hafeez,+F.Y.&publication_year=2010&journal=BioControl&volume=55&pages=531%E2%80%93542&doi=10.1007/s10526-010-9268-z)]
[[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-010-9268-z)]
9. Duttamajumder, S.K. Red Rot of Sugarcane; Indian Institute of
Sugarcane Research: Lucknow, India, 2008; pp. 1–8. [[*Google
Scholar*](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Red+Rot+of+Sugarcane&author=Duttamajumder,+S.K.&publication_year=2008)]
10. Viswanathan, R.; Rao, G.P. Disease scenario and management of major
sugarcane diseases in India. Sugar Tech *2011, *13, 336–353. [[*Google
Scholar*](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Disease+scenario+and+management+of+major+sugarcane+diseases+in+India&author=Viswanathan,+R.&author=Rao,+G.P.&publication_year=2011&journal=Sugar+Tech&volume=13&pages=336%E2%80%93353&doi=10.1007/s12355-011-0102-4)]
[[DOI](https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0102-4)]
11. Viswanathan, R.; Padmanaban, P.; Mohanraj, D.; Jothi, R.
Indirect-ELISA technique for the detection of the red rot pathogen in
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) and resistance screening. Indian J.
Agril. Sci. *2000, *70, 8–11. [[*Google
Scholar*](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Indirect-ELISA+technique+for+the+detection+of+the+red+rot+pathogen+in+sugarcane+(Saccharum+spp.+hybrid)+and+resistance+screening&author=Viswanathan,+R.&author=Padmanaban,+P.&author=Mohanraj,+D.&author=Jothi,+R.&publication_year=2000&journal=Indian+J.+Agril.+Sci.&volume=70&pages=8%E2%80%9311)]
12. Khan, A.; Yadav, M.; Singh, A.S. Image Processing Based Disease
Detection for Sugarcane. Int. J. Adv. Res. Ideas Innov. Technol. *2017,
*3, 497–502. [[*Google
Scholar*](https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Image+Processing+Based+Disease+Detection+for+sugarcane&author=Khan,+A.&author=Yadav,+M.&author=Singh,+A.S.&publication_year=2017&journal=Int.+J.+Adv.+Res.+Ideas+Innov.+Technol.&volume=3&pages=497%E2%80%93502)]
13.
https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/crop_protection/sugarcane_diseases/sugarcane_d4.html
14. Singh, Sujeet & Vishwakarma, S & Kashyap, Sachin & Tiwari, Niraj.
(2022). DISEASE STATUS OF SUGARCANE IN UTTAR PRADESH.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360306210_DISEASE_STATUS_OF_SUGARCANE_IN_UTTAR_PRADESH?enrichId=rgreq-34fffb9ff7ac9dbf77b604e0e6f36e69-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzM2MDMwNjIxMDtBUzoxMTQzMTI4MTA5MTUyODEzNkAxNjY2NTIwMjAyNzcx&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf
15. Kumar, Mukesh & Misra, Varucha & Singh, B & Mall, Ashutosh & Pathak,
A.. (2018). Incidence of Red Rot disease in Sugarcane Variety, CoS 8436,
in Bihar, India. Plant Archives. 18. 182-186.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327719873_Incidence_of_Red_Rot_disease_in_Sugarcane_Variety_CoS_8436_in_Bihar_India?enrichId=rgreq-ec6630a5df0803a024867fa68583c4a3-XXX&enrichSource=Y292ZXJQYWdlOzMyNzcxOTg3MztBUzo5NDk3MzgxNDkwMTE0NTdAMTYwMzQ0NjYyODkyNQ%3D%3D&el=1_x_2&_esc=publicationCoverPdf