Implementation

Implementation

Fig 1. SONG-H with other treatment of burn

Introduction

As our project nears completion, we recognize the importance of considering the real-world implementation, future applications, distribution, and logistics of our work. Given that our end users are patients, it is imperative to provide a comprehensive overview of the targeted burn wounds. Moreover, discussing the prevalence and incidence of this disease is crucial as these factors were instrumental in our selection. We found that the incidence of burn injuries was greater than that of human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and tuberculosis combined and also approached the incidence of all malignant neoplasms. Thus, we decided to work on treatment that promotes rapid wound healing.

Generally, burn wounds are characterized by loss of skin, infection, inflammation, and pain. Current treatment often involves wound care, fluids for rehydration, and pain-relief medicines. Severe burns may require skin grafting, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and antibiotics. Long-term recovery may involve rehabilitation to address scarring, contractures, and psychological trauma.

We intend to provide a novel treatment for burn wounds based on local delivery of engineered mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which are stromal cells that can self-renew in addition to exhibiting multilineage differentiation, along with some bioactive materials in a hydrogel scaffold. Our treatment SONG-H (Stem cell-based Occlusive Nutritive Gel of Healing) is part of a kit that covers burn wounds, promotes epithelialization with minimal scarring,additionally it prevents infection, keeps the wound moist, and reduces pain. It is a topical hydrogel scaffold that carries engineered mesenchymal stem cells. This hydrogel dressing is multifunctional as it plays its therapeutic role according to three main aspects: preventing infections, promoting repair, and constructing scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. Plus, it is a non-toxic, non-inflammatory, moisturizing hydrogel that absorbs wound exudate, maintains skin physical and mechanical integrity and, promotes cellular functions as well as reduces the temperature and pain associated with the wound.

The MSCs are engineered to increase YAP-1 expression which helps to deal with loss of skin through enhancing skin proliferation and cellular differentiation. At this point, the control of MSCs activity is mandatory to prevent any unwanted YAP-1 side effects. This is achieved through the innate nature of YAP-1 as its activity is suppressed in response to cell-to-cell mechanical contact. Moreover, we added a transcription activator receptor that is constrained to the presence of the tissue injury-specific biomarker called Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). Furthermore, we aim to treat the loss of skin by exploiting MSCs’ ability to communicate with other cells through exosomes to increase YAP-1 expression in the surrounding local cells. Indeed, exosomes have the ability to secrete various biologically active molecules which can regulate the responses of surrounding cells. So, we have implemented YAP-1 mRNA inside the exosomes with a protein-specific RNA switch depending on MMP-9 (intracellular tissue injury biomarker). Along with SONG-H in the kit, there is a bactericidal topical agent to prevent infection resulting from skin discontinuity. To ensure the vitality of the healed skin, we considered nutritional elements like zinc, vitamin E, and vitamin C to improve wound healing and immunity. Moreover, we added a systemic analgesic anti-inflammatory drug in the kit to reduce pain and inflammation.

Fig 2. Illustration which describes the response to burn injuries.

Design

The design includes two main stages:

  1. Firstly, when skin injury occurs, the gel is applied to the wound microenvironment, which is full of VEGF that will binds to the external domain of dcas9-synRTK receptor of the engineered MSCs, causing the dimerization of both chains of the receptor. This leads to the activation of TEV protease enzyme which acts on the cleavage site causing the release of dCas9 domains. Then, dCas9 domains assemble and induce YAP-1 production in MSCs, resulting in MSCs proliferation to fill the wound gap even if the wound site is highly destructed and has few viable cells.
  2. Fig 3. The structure of dcas9-synRTK receptor.

    Fig 4. This figure illustrates the TEV-dependent release of N and C fragments of dCas9 and their spontaneous assembly.

  3. Secondly, at the same time, through using the MSCs' ability of cell signaling, our mRNA-specific switch or the Translation Initiation Device (TID) will be loaded on the exosomes to be delivered intracellularly to the surrounding viable cells. Within the wound microenvironment, the burn injury causes an increase in intracellular MMP9 (matrix metalloproteinase 9) which is involved in the breakdown of extracellular matrix (inflammatory biomarker). This MMP9 will bind to a synthesised MMP-9 nanobody found on both mRNA ends: cap and MS2-Aptamer. This binding makes the mRNA segment fold into a circular form causing its activation and increases YAP-1 expression resulting in more proliferation of the viable cells and earlier wound healing.
  4. Fig 5. The structure of TID Switch

    Fig 6. The circularization and activation of TID Switch.

Pre-clinical studies

The pre-clinical study is divided into two stages:In-Vitro study and In-Vivo study.

In-Vitro Study

In our approach, we needed to validate each sector separately, as follows:

  • Structural Validation : Ensures that the biological part is correctly expressed. The engineered receptor structure will be validated through tagging it with hemagglutinin then detecting it by flow cytometry. Moreover, the engineered exosomes will be characterized by electron microscopy.
  • Functional Validation : Ensures that the expressed YAP-1 protein and the dCas9 perform their proper function by proliferative assay.
  • Safety Validation : Ensures the safety of the approach as a whole by testing Dcas9-synRTK receptor through a comparison of the activity of engineered MSCs with and without VEGF using proliferative assay.

In-Vivo Study

Our In-Vivo study will be conducted on animal models. We found that the gold standard animal model for burn treatment is rats, as rats are characterized by reduced healing time. This feature makes it easy for researchers to follow the rat very closely and enables them to study wound healing mechanisms efficiently. Other advantages of using rats in burn studies are their availability and their cost-effectiveness. Moreover, rats share several physiological similarities with humans; and relevantly rats’ skin is composed of dermis and epidermis layers. However, some substantial differences need to be considered as dermal and epidermal thickness, scar formation, and glucose metabolism post-burn injury. Additionally, rats heal by wound contraction, instead of healing by re-epithelization in humans.

Our approach will be intoduced to second-degree burn rats; through the application of hydrogel-containing MSCs to improve MSCs bioactivity and skin regenerative function throughout our pre-clinical studies. This can be achieved by enhancing the engraftment and survival rates of transplanted MSCs. As our study is considered a new assay, it will require a new validation cycle through the three stages of validation; pre-study validation, in-study validation & cross-validation in order to confirm the biological and pharmacological activity of our approach. In addition, this three-stage validation will measure the outcomes of MSCs application, like time, rate of wound healing, proportions of wound contraction and re-epithelialization, the Vancouver scar scale, functional squealae, and also the incidence of treatment-related side effects (pain, bleeding, and infections) at the end of these studies.

The pre-study validation is required before implementing the assay to identify the best design for our approach. Then, in-study validation of our approach will be tested to provide a preliminary assessment of our drug's efficacy, the best time of application, and the route of administration. This will also enable us to know the minimum and maximum dose for ideal treatment with fewer side effects. The validation cycle later ends with cross-validation; in which our approach will be handed off to another screening center where the final validation of our entirely new assay will take place, as our approach will require a replicate determination study (tier2) for full validation. At the end of the validation cycle of the approach, our drug will be finally ready for clinical studies.

Clinical trial

According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , pre-clinical research provides essential data on drug safety but is not enough to bring the drug to market. To validate the safety and efficacy of a new drug, a clinical trial is necessary. The term "clinical trial" refers to studies conducted on human participants to explore the possible and unpredictable interactions of the drug with the human body. Before starting a clinical trial, we must submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the FDA. This application should include the following:

Animal study data and toxicity data

Results from pre-clinical studies that demonstrate the drug’s safety and identify any harmful side effects.

Manufacturing information

Detailed documentation on the drug’s production process, including quality control measures, and consistency across batches.

Clinical protocols (study plans)

A comprehensive outline of the proposed study, including design, participant criteria, dosing, and safety monitoring.

Data from any prior human research

Any previous studies involving humans should be included to support the application.

Information about the investigator

The qualifications and credentials of those conducting the trial.

After submitting the IND application and receiving approval, we will move into the clinical trial phase. This phase is composed of four stages, each involving a different number of participants based on the specific data needed from each stage :

Phase 1 : A small group of healthy volunteers or patients is involved to assess safety, determine safe dosage ranges, and identify potential side effects.

Phase 2 : A larger group of participants is used to further assess the drug’s effectiveness and monitor its safety.

Phase 3 : This phase involves an even larger population to confirm the drug’s efficacy, monitor adverse reactions, and gather more comprehensive safety data.

Phase 4 : Post-marketing studies are conducted after the drug’s approval to collect additional information on long-term risks, benefits, and optimal use.

Fig 7. Shows the four clinical trial phases.

In recent updates, the FDA has emphasized several key factors for clinical trials. One of the factors is the need for greater diversity in trial participants to ensure that results are generalized to a broad patient population. Additionally, there is a growing focus on patient-centered trial designs, ensuring that patient input is considered in the trial process. The FDA has also increased its focus on data integrity, requiring strict adherence to guidelines for data collection, storage, and reporting.

Maintaining alignment with these updated FDA guidelines, particularly regarding participant diversity, patient-focused design, and data transparency, is essential for the successful conduct of our clinical trial and the eventual approval of the treatment for burns.

Market authorization

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (F,D&C Act), along with the regulations in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) Parts 1-58 and 800-1299, establishes the legal framework for regulating medical devices marketed in the United States. The safety and efficacy of a medical device are the primary factors determining its regulatory control and the pathway to market. To bring the SONG-H medical device to the U.S. market, four essential steps must be followed, incorporating the latest updates from the FDA:

Fig 8. Display market authorization steps.

Step One: Classify Your Device and Understand Applicable Controls

This step involves two critical processes. First, we must confirm that our product meets the legal definition of a medical device as outlined in Section 201(h) of the F,D&C Act. Once confirmed, we classify our product into one of three categories based on the associated risk level. According to Section 201(h) of the F,D&C Act, SONG-H are considered medical devices. Based on the Product Classification Database, our product falls under Class III, indicating the highest risk level in device classification.

Recent updates emphasize the importance of accurately classifying the device and understanding the applicable controls, as this step directly influences the regulatory pathway and the type of data required for subsequent steps. The FDA has heightened its focus on ensuring that high-risk devices, particularly those in Class III, undergo rigorous evaluation to confirm their safety and efficacy before reaching the market.

Step Two: Select and Prepare the Correct Pre-market Submission

The type of premarket submission required is determined by the classification of the product established in the previous step. Since SONG-H is classified as a Class III device with the highest risk, we must prepare two specific types of submissions: the "Request for Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation" under 513(f) De Novo Request, and a "Premarket Approval" (PMA).

The FDA's updated guidelines emphasize the need for thorough and accurate premarket submissions, particularly for Class III devices. There is an increased scrutiny on the quality of the data provided, and the submission must clearly demonstrate the device’s safety and effectiveness. The FDA also encourages the use of new submission tools like eSTAR (Electronic Submission Template and Resource) to streamline the process and enhance the quality of submissions.

Step Three: Prepare the Appropriate Information for the Premarket Submission

In this step, all necessary documentation and fees are required for the premarket submission must be meticulously prepared. This includes:

  1. Medical Device User Fees : Payment of the required fees for the submission process.
  2. Small Business Determination (SBD) Program : Application for reduced fees if eligible as a small business.
  3. eCopy: Submission of an electronic copy of the application.
  4. eSTAR : Utilization of the Electronic Submission Template and Resource for streamlined submission.
  5. Administrative Review : Initial review of the submission to ensure completeness.
  6. Interactive Review : Ongoing communication with the FDA during the review process to address any questions or issues.
Step Four: Comply with Applicable Regulatory Controls, Including Establishment Registration and Device Listing

After the premarket submission is complete, compliance with additional regulatory controls is necessary. This includes registering the manufacturing establishment with the FDA and listing the device in the FDA's database. This step ensures that the device is properly documented and tracked in the regulatory system.

The FDA’s recent focus on post-market surveillance and ongoing compliance highlights the importance of this step. Once a device is on the market, it must continue to meet safety and efficacy standards, and must be monitored by the FDA for any issues that may arise. Establishing a strong compliance framework from the beginning is critical for ensuring the device remains in good standing with regulatory authorities.

By following these steps and integrating the latest FDA updates into our process, we can navigate the complex requirements for bringing the SONG-H medical device to the U.S. market. Compliance with these guidelines will help ensure the device's safety, efficacy, and successful market authorization.

Our main Competitor

There are several methods for burn treatment, the gold standard of which is surgical operations such as skin grafts and plastic surgery, but they have many side effects that range from bleeding in the wound area to loss of sensation in the wound area. Moreover, many pharmaceutical medications are used for burn patients, such as painkillers, antidepressants and antibiotics. However, these medications treat burn symptoms only and are not a radical solution. Furthermore, physiotherapy is provided to prevent contracture and facilitate joint movement if the joint is burned. In the last few years, new applications for burn treatment have emerged and gained global attention of many researchers, such as Nanotherapy which has great potentials for burn management. In contrast, these recent therapeutic applications are often expensive and unavailable.

The gold standard method as we mentioned above is reconstruction surgeries as skin grafting, which is an invasive surgical procedure involving the transplantation of skin from a donor site to the affected area. The donor site could be from the patient’s own body or from a human or animal donor. Also, these surgeries carry limitations such as donor site discomfort, limited availability of donor skin , expensive for patients and hospitals, and also graft failure. Skin grafting is also considered an invasive procedure which isn’t favorable by most patients; as ,on the long run, it may cause skin contractures,hypertrophic scars, pain, and cosmetic disfigurement.

On the other hand, SONG-H offers a radical solution to burns by application of genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells to enhance wound healing and reduce the occurrence of wound complications such as contractures, keloids ,and hypertrophic scarring. Also, It is available, more efficient and cost-effective when compared to other available treatments.

Real World Implementation

Annual deaths resulting from burns are estimated at about 180,000 deaths yearly and burn injuries are a significant public health problem in Egypt. Egypt has one of the highest rates of burn-related deaths worldwide. The prevalence of burns is notably higher in developing countries compared to many developed countries. This is attributed to various factors, including socioeconomic conditions such as poverty, cultural practices like traditional cooking methods, and also limited awareness to burn prevention and first aid. Hence, the implementation of our project in Egypt has a great role in the overall burn management. Generally, developing personalized stem cell banks is a crucial step to provide stem cell-based therapy. Later on, we may add a new department for modifying and engineering these stem cells. Besides, engineered mesenchymal stem cells require special conditions to be synthesized, as a specific cell source, nutritive media, optimum temperature, experienced technicians, biological parts, and finally adequate storage. Moreover, we need to raise people’s awareness for burn first aid and how to react to a burn injury; as it can potentially save the victim’s life and also reduce physical and psychological damage.

All of this would happen through advertisements, brochures, and educational sessions in primary health care centers. In tertiary health care and specialized centers, our therapy will be provided as a treatment to improve the burn outcome. We can implement our project more accurately locally and globally, respectively, with the support of the Egyptian Ministry of Health and WHO.

End users

Our target is to give burn victims a better solution through SONG-H that mediates earlier wound closure, minimizes the complications and heals cosmetically better with minimal scarring. This will occur by applying the gel locally in hospitals taking care of contamination to guarantee the treatment quality, training staff to deal with stem cells as well as ensuring available biological parts to produce SONG-H.

Fig 9. Shows our targeted end users. .

Future plan

To implement our project, there will be a short-term plan to validate SONG-H and get FDA approval. After that, we need to settle on a long-term plan which could be regarded as future considerations. Our vision is to manufacture a platform for regenerative medicine. As a start for our project, our therapeutic platform focuses on the simplest cells in the body, which form the skin. However, our hope for the future is that the platform will be available for all tissues and cells; bearing in mind organs that are not capable of healing or self-renewal. These complex non-regenerative tissues include the heart, joints ,and nerves. Furthermore, we hope to make tissue banks for all types of tissues in the future.

Fig 10. Displays our future plan to use regenerative function of SONG-H

Challenges

Fig 11. Illustrates the expected challenges we might face in the future.

To implement our therapeutic approach in a community, there are a lot of challenges that we need to be aware of to make its implementation easier and increase the efficacy of the treatment.

  1. Firstly, a key challenge in our project was securing a reliable source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), as MSCs are considered a core element of our project. Therefore, we are planning to start an awareness campaign for pregnant women to give them information about stem cells and their importance not only in our project but in biomedical research in general. Then, we will ask them to donate the umbilical cord after delivery and obtain informed consent. The umbilical cord is considered a rich source of stem cells, but unfortunately, it is a wasted treasure in a lot of developing countries.
  2. Secondly, we need skilled hands, as we know that most medical experts don’t have enough experience in synthetic biology to handle this project alone. So, the lack of specialized expertise in synthetic biology within the healthcare sector can hinder progress in implementing and developing these treatments. This gap in knowledge can lead to challenges in designing and conducting research, interpreting data, and translating research findings into clinical practice. To address this issue, it is essential to invest in training programs and educational initiatives to develop a skilled staff in synthetic biology within the healthcare field, like building a team and training every member for such a huge project as SONG-H. The team will consist of plastic surgeons, researchers, and synthetic biology experts. All team members will be well informed about the project so they can improve the quality of the treatment and overcome any limitations.
  3. Thirdly, developing and implementing synthetic biology to treat burns can be financially demanding; taking in consideration the fund needed for research, development, and clinical trials, especially in the early stages of development. Adding to that, the high costs associated with synthetic biology research; burn injuries greater including laboratory equipment, reagents, and specialized expertise, can limit the availability of funding. Additionally, the potential market risks can make it difficult for investors to justify significant financial commitments.

References

  1. Lian N, Li T. Growth factor pathways in hypertrophic scars: molecular pathogenesis and therapeutic implications. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;84:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlanga-Acosta J, Gavilondo-Cowley J, López-Saura P, et al. Epidermal growth factor in clinical practice - a review of its biological actions, clinical indications and safety implications. Int Wound J. 2009;6(5):331–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00622.x [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mansilla E, Marín GH, Berges M, Scafatti S, Rivas J, Núñez A, et al. Cadaveric bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: first experience treating a patient with large severe burns. Burns Trauma. 2015;3:17. doi: 10.1186/s41038-015-0018-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rasulov MF, Vasil AV, Onishchenko NA, Krasheninnikov ME, Kravchenko VI, Gorshenin TL, et al. First experience in the use of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of a patient with deep skin burns. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2005;139(1):141–4. doi: 10.1007/s10517-005-0232-3. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Yoshikawa T, Mitsuno H, Nonaka I, Sen Y, Kawanishi K, Inada Y, et al. Wound therapy by marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:860–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Xu Y, Huang S, Fu X. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a promising therapeutic strategy for prevention of skin-graft contraction. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012;37:497–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Maranda EL, Wang MX, Shareef S, Tompkins BA, Emerson C, Badiavas EV. Surgical management of leukoderma after burn: a review. Burns. 2018;44:256–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kucharzewski M, Rojczyk E, Wilemska-Kucharzewska K, Wilk R, Hudecki J, Los MJ. Novel trends in application of stem cells in skin wound healing. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;843:307–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. da Silva Meirelles L, Fontes AM, Covas DT, Caplan AI. Mechanisms involved in the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20:419–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gnecchi M, Danieli P, Malpasso G, Ciuffreda MC. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1416:123–46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_7. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan RK, Zamora DO, Wrice NL, et al. Development of a vascularized skin construct using adipose-derived stem cells from debrided burned skin. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2012/841203 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Trottier V, Marceau-Fortier G, Germain L, Vincent C, Fradette J. IFATS collection: using human adipose-derived stem/stromal cells for the production of new skin substitutes. Stem Cells. 2008;26(10):2713–2723. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maharlooei MK, Bagheri M, Solhjou Z, et al. Adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cell (AD-MSC) promotes skin wound healing in diabetic rats. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93(2):228–234. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.04.018 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tartarini D, Mele E. Adult stem cell therapies for wound healing: biomaterials and computational models. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2016;3:206. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00206 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Step 3: Clinical Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/patients/drug-development-process/step-3-clinical-research
  16. .U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). How to Study and Market Your Device. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/how-study-and-market-your-device
  17. Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of burn injuries - UpToDate

ARMED FORCES COLLEGE OF MEDECINE
AFCM EGYPT iGEM 2024

Awards

© 2024 - Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The repository used to create this website is available at gitlab.igem.org/2024/afcm-egypt.