Project Implementation
While our project shows promise, it is crucial to consider its viability on an industrial scale. Is it feasible and scalable? Could this approach represent the future of Neodymium and other rare earth metal separation processes, given the ever-growing demand for these precious resources?
Throughout our research and project development, we have been mindful of envisioning our system's potential for large-scale implementation. In this section, we outline how our proposed system could integrate into existing industrial processes - an idea fostered by our visit to the Sherbourne Recycling Company, who discussed with us where our project would fit into their plant.
Step 1: E-waste Pre-treatment
E-waste from electronics like smartphones and computers is a complex mixture of metals, polymers, and ceramics, requiring multiple stages of pre-treatment to liberate valuable metals. The process begins with industrial-scale shredders and crushers that break down the e-waste into smaller fragments, increasing the surface area for subsequent treatments. Magnetic separators are then employed to extract ferrous metals, while eddy current separators help in isolating non-ferrous metals, including rare earth elements like neodymium.
Automated conveyors and optical sorting systems are integrated into the process, ensuring rapid and precise separation of different components. In some cases, pyrolysis units are used to thermally treat the waste, removing organic materials, and exposing the metal content for easier recovery.
By incorporating mechanical and thermal treatments at the pre-treatment stage, we minimise the use of harmful reagents and ensure higher recovery rates of valuable metals like neodymium.
Step 2: Acid Leaching for Metal Extraction
After e-waste pre-treatment, acid leaching is employed to chemically extract valuable metals, particularly rare earth elements like neodymium. On an industrial scale, this process would involve large-scale leaching reactors with precise controls for temperature, acid concentration, and agitation. We use inorganic acids such as HCl, H2SO4, or preferably HNO3 at concentrations between 0.01 and 0.10M, which are delivered through automated acid dosing systems. The e-waste is then treated in these reactors, where metal components dissolve into the acid solution, forming metallic ions.
Continuous monitoring systems regulate the solid-to-liquid ratio, temperature, and acid concentration maximise metal recovery. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is added as an oxidising agent to further improve efficiency, especially for metals like copper, enhancing the selective extraction of rare earth elements.
By minimising acid concentrations and optimising leaching conditions, our process reduces the environmental impact typically associated with heavy chemical usage. The implementation of closed-loop systems for acid recovery and recycling further enhances the sustainability of this process, making it superior in terms of efficiency and scalability compared to traditional e-waste recycling techniques.
Step 3: Bacterial Uptake and Chemotaxis
In our process, genetically modified Methylobacterium extorquens is engineered to enhance its uptake for neodymium. These bacteria will actively scavenge lanthanide ions from solution by transporting them inside the cell. To ensure optimal performance, the bacteria will be cultured under controlled conditions: 30°C, pH 6.6, 1 atm pressure, and sufficient aeration. These conditions closely mimic laboratory-scale settings but are scalable to industrial processes using large bioreactors equipped with temperature and pH controllers, as well as aeration systems to maintain consistent oxygen levels throughout the culture.
The critical feature of this step is the chemotactic behaviour of the bacteria, which allows it to move directionally towards an extraction point. This is also facilitated by automated flow systems that direct the bacterial population to a dedicated extraction point where metal-laden bacteria can be harvested. Sensors and microfluidic controllers will ensure precise bacterial movement and metal uptake.
Compared to existing chemical processes, which often rely on high temperatures, toxic chemicals, and expensive filtration methods, our biological approach offers a more sustainable and cost-effective solution. The use of M. extorquens eliminates the need for harsh conditions, making this method both energy-efficient and environmentally friendly, with a significantly lower risk of pollution. Additionally, by leveraging chemotaxis, we improve metal recovery rates compared to conventional adsorption-based methods, which lack the active movement and metal-seeking capability of our engineered bacteria.
Step 4: Bacterial Extraction
Bacterial extraction is a critical phase where the bacteria responsible for scavenging lanthanide ions are separated from the process medium. On an industrial scale, this is implemented using membrane filtration systems with semi-permeable polymeric membranes designed to filter out the process fluid and retain the bacteria. These membranes, typically made from cellulose esters or similar materials, have pore sizes of 0.22 to 0.45 µm, which is optimal for retaining bacteria containing the valuable ions, whilst filtering out other undesired chemicals.
In practice, the process involves pumping the bacteria-containing solution through the filtration system under controlled pressure. The bacteria are trapped in the collected retentate, while the permeate is sent on for processing elsewhere. To prevent membrane clogging and ensure efficient operation, backwashing and cleaning systems are employed to remove buildup and prolong membrane life. Pre-treatment such as fine screening may also be implemented to remove larger particles before filtration, especially in high-turbidity environments.
This method is superior to traditional bacterial extraction processes because it enables continuous operation on a large scale while maintaining high bacterial recovery efficiency. Compared to older processes like centrifugation, membrane filtration is more energy-efficient and adaptable to high-throughput industrial environments, making it ideal for large-scale applications.
Step 5: Neodymium Recovery
Following bacterial extraction, neodymium recovery involves lysis of the bacteria to release the neodymium ions that have been scavenged. This is achieved through thermal or chemical lysis methods in industrial lysing reactors capable of processing large volumes of bacterial biomass efficiently. By breaking apart the cell walls and membranes, the neodymium is released into the solution.
Once the neodymium ions are liberated, the solution undergoes thermal treatment in high-temperature furnaces. This step not only purifies the neodymium but also removes any remaining organic material, resulting in a concentrated neodymium solution.
This integrated approach optimises the process using continuous flow systems and automated reactors, minimising human intervention while maximising efficiency. By employing bacterial extraction followed by lysis, we reduce the reliance on harmful chemicals and enhance selectivity in recovering neodymium, making this method both sustainable and scalable for industrial applications.
Step 6: Neodymium Processing
After neodymium recovery, the next step is to process and refine the neodymium-rich solution to achieve high purity. This begins with solvent extraction using mixer-settlers, where the solution is mixed with organic solvents to separate the neodymium into a cleaner phase. This process may be repeated in multiple stages to further increase purity.
Following solvent extraction, the purified solution undergoes precipitation using oxalic acid, a common and effective agent for separating rare earth elements from other dissolved ions. The addition of oxalic acid converts the dissolved neodymium into a solid form, typically as neodymium oxalate. The stoichiometric ratio of oxalic acid to neodymium sulfate is critical for optimising precipitation efficiency; studies indicate that ratios as high as 19.52 can achieve precipitation efficiencies up to 99.4% for neodymium. The resulting solid is then filtered and dried using rotary filters and dryers, preparing it for final refining.
Finally, the neodymium oxalate is subjected to high-temperature calcination, typically around 850 °C for 120 minutes. This thermal treatment effectively transforms the oxalate into neodymium oxide, removing any remaining impurities and yielding high-purity neodymium metal.
This is the pyrometallurgical technique that our project aims to reduce. By enriching neodymium in a smaller sample, less of this intensive processing needs to be done.
This streamlined approach allows for continuous production, minimises waste generation, and ensures that the final product meets industrial purity standards.
Step 7: Waste Management
After the neodymium extraction and processing steps, the remaining acid leachate is treated to neutralise its pH before disposal. This is done by adding alkaline substances, such as lime or sodium hydroxide, to bring the pH to a neutral range, ensuring the treated solution can be safely discharged or further processed, meeting environmental regulations.
Additionally, the bacterial biomass used in earlier steps for scavenging lanthanides can be recycled. Instead of discarding it as waste, the biomass holds potential for biogas production through anaerobic digestion, contributing to a circular economy by generating renewable energy. Alternatively, the biomass can be composted and used as a nutrient-rich material for agricultural purposes, further reducing waste.
By treating waste effectively and reusing by-products, this process not only meets regulatory compliance but also promotes a sustainable, eco-friendly approach to resource recovery from e-waste.
References
- A. Kumari, R. Panda, M. K. Jha, J. R. Kumar, & J. Y. Lee. (2015). Process development to recover rare earth metals from monazite mineral: A review. Minerals Engineering, 79, 70-78.
- Akcil, A., Rama Swami, K., Gardas, R. L., Hazrati, E., & Dembele, S. (2024). Overview on hydrometallurgical recovery of rare-earth metals from red mud. Minerals, 14(6), 587.
- Castro, L., Blázquez, M. L., González, F., & Muñoz, J. Á. (2020). Biohydrometallurgy for rare earth elements recovery from industrial wastes. Molecules, 26(20), 6200.
- Filtration Methods. (2014). In N. F. Gray (Ed.), Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
- Bridle, H., & Schultz, A. C. (2014). Sample processing. In Waterborne Pathogens.
- Chen, W., & Liu, Y. (2020). Process flow during the pre-treatment of e-waste.
- Zhou, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, W., & Jiang, M. (2019). Advances in the recovery of rare earth elements from e-waste. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 483.
- Zhang, W., & Honaker, R. (2022). Process development for the recovery of rare earth elements and critical metals from an acidic mine leachate. Department of Mining and Minerals Engineering, Virginia Tech, USA.
- Poma, A. (2019). Advances in rare earth elements recovery from industrial waste. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
- J. C. Davis, D. (2014). Analysis of rare earth element recovery. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
- Filtration Methods. Nicholas F. Gray, in Microbiology of Waterborne Diseases (Second Edition). Academic Press, 2014.
- Echeverry-Vargas, L., Rojas-Reyes, N. R., & Ocampo-Carmona, L. M. (2022). Recovery of light rare earth elements, cerium, lanthanum, and neodymium from alluvial gold mining waste from the Bagre-Nechí mining district in Colombia using acid leaching, oxalate precipitation, and calcination. Hydrometallurgy, 202, 106009.