As an iGEM team, we attach much importance to integrated human practices, which always give us inspiration for our project and enable us to improve consistently.
We emphasized how experts' advice helps us to solve problems of our projects, and finally reflected on how we improve ourselves in further research.
In addition, considering the wide range of application scenarios of our projects, we pay more attention to the diversity of applications. We divided people who can help us into three groups:
Let's see how we apply our HP criteria to practical research.
For background and marketing considerations, please click "implementation" page to check how our project connects with society.
Director, Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University
Problem:
Conversation with Prof. Li
By searching for relevant articles, we got in touch with Professor Li. Considering his busy schedule, we chose to communicate with him by email.
Solution:
Reflection:
Professor Li's response confirms what we envisioned in the pathway design and emphasizes that the addition of integrases in chronological order is necessary to achieve the temporal effect. At the same time, the application scenarios he proposed broadened the feasibility of our products in the field of the chemical industry.
Vice President, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences
Problem:
Conversation with Prof. Liu:
Also by searching for relevant articles, we got in touch with Professor Liu. However, because Professor Liu often stays in Shenzhen, which is far away from Beijing, we continue to use email for communication.
Solution:
Reflection:
Professor Liu's proposal is comprehensive and includes many factors to consider, from theoretical feasibility to practical application. Under his advice, we focused on screening suitable recombinant enzymes and CRISPER systems, and we also began to consider project applications in closed systems, with satisfactory results. At the same time, he gave our members a lot of encouragement and enhanced our confidence in completing the project.
Researcher, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Problem: When the project is conceived, we will ask Professor Wang's opinion. When we first got the idea for this project, we went to report to teacher Wang Jiangyun and asked him about the rationality of our project.
Conversation with Wang:
Since Professor Wang was very helpful and patient to answer our questions, we communicated with him both online and offline.
Solution: Professor Wang affirmed the rationality of our idea and suggested that we should focus on the application scenarios of our project, such as disease treatment. It's also important to think boldly about how assuming the project is complete, we can use it to improve the world around us. This has led to a strong focus on project application in our HP work this year.
Reflection: Our interaction with Professor Wang taught us that when determining a project, we should not only focus on the feasibility of the project, but also take a long-term view to see what positive impact the project may bring.
Problem:
Once our project had taken shape, we started thinking about productization. Our idea is to use our technology to develop a kit for programmable components, so we contacted teachers Liu Ping and Song Yanyan of BGI, hoping to get their advice.
Conversation with BGI:
To improve communication efficiency, we took the form of online meetings with BGI teachers to communicate.
Solution:
The teachers affirmed our ideas and designs and thought our ideas were novel, but they also raised some problems we had:
Reflection:
Senior undergraduate student, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Problem: In thinking downstream, can our project be applied to the aspects we envision? In other words, are there any factors we haven't considered before applying? This is an issue that we take very seriously.
Conversation with Kaming Li: Considering Li's busy academic work, we communicated with him by E-mail.
Solution: Li told us, this project has provided perfect ideas and thoughts. The programmable logic devices offer new ideas and references for designing synthetic biology pathways. However, the two-input pathway is a little easy in synthetic biology. Suppose programmable logic gates with multiple inputs corresponding to one input and multiple inputs corresponding to various inputs can be added. In that case, the ideas and applications of this project can be further broadened.
Reflection: When considering the application of products, we should take the initiative to adapt our products to different application scenarios and provide more choices, which will have more application prospects.