The Development of Textile Industry and Its Impact on our World
The textile industry is growing rapidly. At the same time, the amount of textile waste that harms the environment is also increasing. The invention of the spinning jenny in 1764 laid the foundations for the mass production of textiles (Watt, 2004). The invention of the steam engine 11 years later made it a reality (Watt, 2004). Although the prices for clothes dropped so the working class could afford them, the environmental impact of this industry was not considered. In addition, the people had no idea of how the textile industry would look nowadays.
Existing Solutions
Mixed textiles, such as cotton-polyester blends, cannot be recycled efficiently nowadays. Hence, the development of new recycling approaches is necessary.
As our team learnt about the impact of textile waste, we started looking for recycling strategies. We found that clothes are mainly made from polyester and cotton, which can be structurally regarded as PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and cellulose, respectively (Egan & Salmon, 2021). There are different approaches to recycle these materials, including the production of cleaning rags or melting and re-spinning thermoplastic fibers as well as many others (Piribauer et al., 2021). However, the degradation of mixed textiles, e.g. cotton-polyester blends, remains challenging and typically requires the separation of each composite fiber type (Loo et al., 2023).
Therefore, we decided to develop our own solution to this problem using the principles of synthetic biology. To this end, we conducted an extensive literature research on biological approaches for textile recycling. The advantage of biological approaches over others is that they can be applied to selectively degrade each type of fiber in blended materials (Kaabel et al., 2023; Li et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2013).
Furthermore, we searched for iGEM projects that tried to tackle the textile waste issue. Many iGEM projects from previous years were focused on the production of biodegradable polymer materials for fiber production, but, surprisingly, only a few projects were specifically dedicated to the degradation of the existing textile waste (GreatBay SCIE, 2022; Team Evry, 2016; Team Gothenburg, 2020; Team Imperial College London, 2013; Team LINKS China, 2021).
Our Solution
With our project "ReFiBa" we aim to degrade cotton and polyester clothing using recombinant bacterial cellulases and PETases produced by Bacillus subtilis.
Our project, ReFiBa (Enzyme-based Recycling of Textile Fibers using B. subtilis, is dedicated to developing an innovative solution for the degradation of cotton/polyester fibers and thus promoting a sustainable future. To achieve this, cellulases and PETases of bacterial origin have been selected and B. subtilis has been chosen as an expression host for enzyme production. Whereas PETases catalyze the formation of terephthalic acid (TPA) and ethylene glycol (EG) from PET, three types of cellulases (β-1,4-glucosidases, exo- and endoglucanases) are required to degrade cellulose to glucose (Behera et al., 2017; Egan & Salmon, 2021). TPA can be removed from the solution by acidic precipitation, while the remaining EG and glucose can be applied for further fermentation processes to gain high value chemicals (Sandhwar & Prasad, 2017; Wagner et al., 2023). Hence, a circular economy concept could be developed.
Infobox Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis belongs to the phylum Firmicutes and is the best-studied Gram-positive bacterium. Due to its rapid growth, easy cultivation, non-pathogenic (generally regarded as safe) and probiotic properties as well as powerful genetic tools, it serves as a model organism in numerous studies (Su et al., 2020). The cells are rod-shaped, occur ubiquitously in the soil and exhibit an aerobic lifestyle. Additionally, B. subtilis is able to form highly resistant endospores and possesses a very efficient secretion capacity, making it an interesting host organism for heterologous protein expression (Cui et al., 2018; Errington & van der Aa, 2020; Harwood, 1992; Schumann, 2007).
Two Approaches for Protein Production
In our project, polyester/cotton degrading enzymes were displayed on the spore surface of B. subtilis. Additionally, B. subtilis was engineered to secrete these enzymes or to produce them intracellularly.
Two different approaches for protein production were explored in our project. Our main goal was to immobilize PETases and cellulases of bacterial origin on the spore surface of B. subtilis using a technology called spore surface display, in which the target protein is fused to a protein out of the spore coat (Zhang et al., 2019). Spores can be used under harsh environmental conditions, making them suitable for industrial applications (Lin et al., 2020). Furthermore, spores are relatively small (1.2 μm long and 0.8 μm wide) in comparison to other immobilization platforms (Chada et al., 2003). This is an important factor influencing the ability of spores to access dense textile fibers and is crucial for efficient degradation of apparels. Additionally, immobilization of enzymes on the spore surface eliminates the need for enzyme purification and might increase the stability and reusability of proteins (Lin et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2019).
Prior to spore surface immobilization, selected enzymes, either secreted or intracellular were investigated to find suitable candidates for spore surface display. For protein secretion, PETases and cellulases were fused to signal peptides which either are naturally used for secretion of the respective enzymes or were derived from B. subtilis. In general, the secretion of enzymes into their surrounding makes their downstream processing easier and more cost-effective compared to intracellular enzyme expression (Neef et al., 2021). The disadvantage of freely diffusing enzymes in comparison to immobilized proteins is that their stability is typically more limited (Maghraby et al., 2023).
Infobox on Bacillus subtilis Spores for Protein Immobilization
In general, spores are promising candidates for immobilization of proteins, as they can survive harsh environments and do not lose their resistance properties after genetic modification (Hinc et al., 2013). Particularly, B. subtilis endospores are frequently used due to their probiotic properties, for example in development of vaccines or animal feed production (Cutting, 2011; Hong et al., 2005; Isticato et al., 2001). The spore achieves its resistance to environmental stress (chemicals, heat, ultraviolet radiation) mainly through its spore coat (Driks & Eichenberger, 2016). It serves as a protective barrier, protecting the spore from toxic substances and predatory microbes (Balassa & Yamamoto, 1970; Klobutcher et al., 2006). Nevertheless, the envelope is permeable, for example to nutrients that pass through to receptors in the inner membrane, which then trigger a signal for germination (Moir & Cooper, 2015).
The composition of the spore coat is very complex. It contains at least 80 proteins, which are arranged in four layers: basement layer, inner coat, outer coat and crust (Driks & Eichenberger, 2016). The aim of displaying proteins on the spore surface is to improve their stability and functionality by anchoring them in the coat (Zhang et al., 2019). Moreover, this strategy enables the protection of target proteins from heat-induced denaturation and organic solvents. Another advantage is the easy recovery and reusability of the modified endospores for multiple reactions. Thus, the spore display technology represents a sustainable and cost-effective tool in biotechnology (Bartels et al., 2018; Sheldon, 2007).
References
Balassa, G., & Yamamoto, T. (1970). Biochemical genetics of bacterial
sporulation. 3. Correlation between morphological and biochemical properties
of
sporulation mutants. Molecular & General Genetics : MGG, 108(1), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343179
Bartels, J., López Castellanos, S., Radeck, J., & Mascher, T. (2018).
Sporobeads: The Utilization of the Bacillus subtilis Endospore Crust
as a
Protein Display Platform. ACS Synthetic Biology, 7(2), 452–461.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSYNBIO.7B00285
Behera, B. C., Sethi, B. K., Mishra, R. R., Dutta, S. K., & Thatoi, H. N.
(2017). Microbial cellulases – Diversity & biotechnology with reference to
mangrove environment: A review. Journal of Genetic Engineering &
Biotechnology,
15(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JGEB.2016.12.001
Caro, F., & Martìnez-De-Albèniz, V. (2015). Fast Fashion: Business Model
Overview and Research Opportunities. International Series in Operations
Research
and Management Science, 223, 237–264.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7562-1_9
Chada, V. G. R., Sanstad, E. A., Wang, R., & Driks, A. (2003). Morphogenesis
of
Bacillus Spore Surfaces. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(21), 6255.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.21.6255-6261.2003
Cui, W., Han, L., Suo, F., Liu, Z., Zhou, L., & Zhou, Z. (2018).
Exploitation of
Bacillus subtilis as a robust workhorse for production of
heterologous
proteins and beyond. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 34(10).
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11274-018-2531-7
Cutting, S. M. (2011). Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiology, 28(2),
214–220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FM.2010.03.007
Driks, A., & Eichenberger, P. (2016). The Spore Coat. Microbiology Spectrum,
4(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/MICROBIOLSPEC.TBS-0023-2016
Egan, J., & Salmon, S. (2021). Strategies and progress in synthetic textile
fiber biodegradability. SN Applied Sciences 2021 4:1, 4(1), 1–36.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-021-04851-7
Errington, J., & van der Aa, L. T. (2020). Microbe Profile: Bacillus
subtilis: model organism for cellular development, and industrial
workhorse. Microbiology, 166(5), 425. https://doi.org/10.1099/MIC.0.000922
European Parliament. (2024). The impact of textile production and waste on
the
environment (infographics) | Topics | European Parliament.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20201208STO93327/the-impact-of-textile-production-and-waste-on-the-environment-infographics
Harwood, C. R. (1992). Bacillus subtilis and its relatives: molecular
biological and industrial workhorses. Trends in Biotechnology, 10(7),
247–256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(92)90233-L
Hinc, K., Iwanicki, A., & Obuchowski, M. (2013). New stable anchor protein
and
peptide linker suitable for successful spore surface display in B.
subtilis. Microbial Cell Factories, 12(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-12-22
Hong, H. A., Le, H. D., & Cutting, S. M. (2005). The use of bacterial spore
formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 29(4), 813–835.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FEMSRE.2004.12.001
Isticato, R., Cangiano, G., Tran, H. T., Ciabattini, A., Medaglini, D.,
Oggioni,
M. R., De Felice, M., Pozzi, G., & Ricca, E. (2001). Surface display of
recombinant proteins on Bacillus subtilis spores. Journal of
Bacteriology, 183(21), 6294–6301.
https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.21.6294-6301.2001
Kaabel, S., Arciszewski, J., Borchers, T. H., Therien, J. P. D., Friščić,
T., &
Auclair, K. (2023). Solid-State Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Mixed PET/Cotton
Textiles. ChemSusChem, 16(1), e202201613.
https://doi.org/10.1002/CSSC.202201613
Klobutcher, L. A., Ragkousi, K., & Setlow, P. (2006). The Bacillus
subtilis spore coat provides “eat resistance” during phagocytic
predation by the protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. Proceedings of the
National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(1), 165–170.
https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0507121102/SUPPL_FILE/INDEX.HTML
Li, X., Hu, Y., Du, C., & Lin, C. S. K. (2019). Recovery of Glucose and
Polyester from Textile Waste by Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Waste and Biomass
Valorization, 10(12), 3763–3772.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S12649-018-0483-7/FIGURES/9
Lin, P., Yuan, H., Du, J., Liu, K., Liu, H., & Wang, T. (2020). Progress in
research and application development of surface display technology using
Bacillus subtilis spores. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2020
104:6, 104(6), 2319–2331. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-020-10348-X
Loo, S. L., Yu, E., & Hu, X. (2023). Tackling critical challenges in textile
circularity: A review on strategies for recycling cellulose and polyester
from
blended fabrics. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(5),
110482.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2023.110482
Moir, A., & Cooper, G. (2015). Spore Germination. Microbiology Spectrum,
3(6).
https://doi.org/10.1128/MICROBIOLSPEC.TBS-0014-2012
Neef, J., van Dijl, J. M., & Buist, G. (2021). Recombinant protein secretion
by
Bacillus subtilis and Lactococcus lactis: pathways, applications, and
innovation potential. Essays in Biochemistry, 65(2), 187.
https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20200171
Piribauer, B., Bartl, A., & Ipsmiller, W. (2021). Enzymatic textile
recycling -
best practices and outlook. Waste Management & Research : The Journal of the
International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 39(10),
1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211029167
Sandhwar, V. K., & Prasad, B. (2017). Terephthalic acid removal from aqueous
solution by electrocoagulation and electro-Fenton methods: Process
optimization
through response surface methodology. Process Safety and Environmental
Protection, 107, 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2017.02.014
Schumann, W. (2007). Production of recombinant proteins in Bacillus
subtilis. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 62, 137–189.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(07)62006-1
Sheldon, R. A. (2007). Enzyme Immobilization: The Quest for Optimum
Performance.
Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, 349(8–9), 1289–1307.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ADSC.200700082
Shen, F., Xiao, W., Lin, L., Yang, G., Zhang, Y., & Deng, S. (2013).
Enzymatic
saccharification coupling with polyester recovery from cotton-based waste
textiles by phosphoric acid pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 130,
248–255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.12.025
Su, Y., Liu, C., Fang, H., & Zhang, D. (2020). Bacillus subtilis: a
universal cell factory for industry, agriculture, biomaterials and medicine.
Microbial Cell Factories 2020 19:1, 19(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S12934-020-01436-8
Team Evry. (2016). Let’s PLAy - Bioproduction of Poly-Lactic acid.
https://2016.igem.org/Team:Evry/Description
Team Gothenburg. (2020). No Time To Waste.
https://2020.igem.org/Team:Chalmers-Gothenburg/Description
Team Imperial College London. (2013). Plasticity.
https://2013.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Imperial_College/tour
Team LINKS China. (2021). Neoleathic age.
https://2021.igem.org/Team:LINKS_China
Wagner, N., Wen, L., Frazão, C. J. R., & Walther, T. (2023). Next-generation
feedstocks methanol and ethylene glycol and their potential in industrial
biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances, 69, 108276.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2023.108276
Watt, M. (2004). Nineteenth-Century European Textile Production | Essay |
The
Metropolitan Museum of Art | Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History.
https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/txtn/hd_txtn.htm
Zhang, G., An, Y., Zabed, H. M., Guo, Q., Yang, M., Yuan, J., Li, W., Sun,
W., &
Qi, X. (2019). Bacillus subtilis Spore Surface Display Technology: A
Review of Its Development and Applications. Journal of Microbiology and
Biotechnology, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.4014/JMB.1807.06066