Introduction
Integrated Human Practices (IHP) aims to incorporate external feedback and insights into project design and optimization through research, communication, and interaction with relevant stakeholders.
The core goal of IHP is to ensure that the team not only relies on laboratory results but also considers the project's impact on society, the environment, and ethics, making the project more applicable and sustainable. From March to August, our HP team members hosted various offline activities, continuously refining our project through the four phases of Design, Build, Test, and Learn, leading to substantial improvements and optimizations.
The very begining
iGEM Competition Exchange Meeting
On February 27th, we participate in the iGEM Competition Exchange Meeting, inviting Ms. Zhang Nan, Vice President of iGEM Global Development. This meeting is hold by our kindly neighborhood SZU-China. We are glad to have the chance to learn what real integrated human practice is.
From this meeting we understood than integrated improvement to our project gained from human practice is ihp. Thus our ihp journey began!
Stage 1: Research and Public Awareness
Design:We want to know whether our current project is valuable and how can we make it better.
Communication With Prof. Yuze Wang
Build & Test: Professor Yuze Wang is an expert in the field of carbon dioxide management and has led several large-scale carbon sequestration projects. We hope she can evaluate the feasibility of our project.
Learn: Through our discussions, we learned about the advantages of oceans as carbon absorption environments and the benefits of minerals as a form of carbon sequestration. Professor Wang pointed out the general direction of our project: utilize biomineralization mechanism, and we invited her to serve as the Primary PI to guide SUSTechOCEAN.
After this communication, we established the direction of biomineralization and find out that we have to solve the following acidification(See more details in Design).
Pingshan Lecture
Build & Test: Held in the Southern University of Science and Technology, we introduced ocean carbon reservoir and collect feedback from about 200 teenagers with paper questionary.
Learn: We are glad that our idea is appealing to the teens. Their understanding in ocean protection was incredible, they criticized us for using paper questionary because of more carbon emission.In subsequent projects, we adopt a paperless approach whenever possible.
Survey
- 1.Please self-evaluate your understanding of global climate change.
- 2.Do you know the impact of carbon dioxide content on marine ecosystem?
- 3.Please assess the degree to which the global natural environment and climate are threatened by carbon emission changes, human activities and other factors
- 4.Please self-evaluate your knowledge about carbon emissions and carbon footprint:
Build: After educating students at Pingshan Middle School, we redesigned the electronic version of our questionnaire.
Test: After distribution, we have received a total of 287 questionnaires so far.
Learn: We distributed these questionnaires in various locations and settings. The final results revealed differences influenced by regional education levels, which ultimately led us to Hainan (See more details in Collaboration ) . If given the opportunity, we hope to spread the concept of combating the climate crisis and protecting the planet to even more distant places.
We found that:
-
Public awareness of the climate crisis is still insufficient, and we need to further expand our efforts to educate people
-
There is little public interest in carbon sequestration, and it is difficult to provide effective feedback, so we need to seek advice from the professional field
Carbon Absorption Research
Build: Assigned team members to conduct literature analysis and background research.
Learn: We explored various carbon absorption pathways. After comparing them, we adjusted our project plan and established the general direction of leveraging the ocean's inorganic carbon reservoir to sequester carbon as calcium carbonate. This helped the experimental team define the design approach for Vibrio natriegens. We aimed to driven three ocean carbon pump to make a comprehensive carbon storage.
Test: We reviewed the Emission Report 2023-2021 and conducted a qualitative comparison between existing emission reduction strategies and our approach.
Blue Planet Screening
Build: We collaborated with the Better Blue NGO and hosted a screening event at the school library.
Test: Followed up with discussions to understand public reactions to carbon sink technology.
Learn: We gained insights into the carbon sequestration potential of coral reefs, which further helped the experimental team refine the design of Vibrio natriegens In which we choose coral acid-rich proteins (CARPs) as the coding gene.
Qianlinshan Elementary School Outreach
Build: We visited Qianlinshan Primary School to conduct a science outreach program titled "Seaweed and Carbon Neutrality."
Test: We tested the effectiveness of the presentation by asking questions and conducted in-depth interviews with teachers afterward.
Learn: The teachers suggested reducing text-heavy descriptions and incorporating more interactive images to capture the children's attention. This feedback guided us in designing the educational curriculum for the Dream Aquarium. This feedback guided us in designing the educational curriculum for the Dream Aquarium. (Click to see details)
Stage 2: Public Engagement and Interaction
Design: Organized interactive activities that encouraged public participation, making HP events more practical and feasible.
Dream aquarium
Build: We reached out to the most popular aquarium in Shenzhen, hoping to establish a collaboration.
Test: We used our knowledge to help the Ocean Dream Pavilion design an educational program, and in return, they offered us a permanent exhibit space for our project.
Learn: We learned that as an exhibition venue, a comprehensive design approach engages all senses when showcasing a theme. This perspective has also been incorporated into our project design to promote the integration of various aspects of our work, which is essential! We followed this concept to design our co-culturing system and safety approaches. (Click to see details)
Campus Open Day
Build: Prepared lab demonstrations, project introductions, and interactive sessions.
Test: Presented experiment and collected public feedback.
Learn: Public education was effective, but concerns about the economic feasibility of the technology were raised, leading us to focus more on cost-efficiency research. Since calcium carbonate isn’t valuable. We decided to search for a cheaper organic compound to consume.
Beach Clean-Up
Build: We visited the famous beach in Shenzhen, Dameisha, to conduct a beach cleanup..
Test: We purchased insurance for participants and collectively took a bus to the beach for the litter cleanup.
Learn:
We discovered that the beach had a significant amount of litter.
Among the litter, most of them are shells from seafood like mollusks, shrimp, and crabs
are common on the beach, even buried in the sand. This abundance of chitin caught our
attention.
Our primary PI Chuanlun Zhang appreciated our investigation and pointed out that
coastal life is thriving and has many fascinating functions.
Project Culture and Interaction
Build: To facilitate a friendlier approach and make it easier to establish communication in the early stages, we conducted a comprehensive design of our project's cultural and creative products, incorporating visual, auditory, tactile, and olfactory elements.
Test: We created various attractive small gifts, composed a music album (using the AI tool SUNO), designed a board game themed around the carbon economy, and produced ocean-scented fragrance cards.
Learn: While conducting our “Eco Monopoly”, cost of science development is an important parameter. HP reflect this situation and inspired Wet Lab considering the cost in experiments. This consideration finally leading to a innovated low-cost formic acid detection method. (See more details in Experiment )
the 8th iSCRM
Build: Hold by the SZU-China, we participated in a technical discussion with other iGEM teams in South China.
Test: We participant in presentation and communication with other teams face to face.
Learn: The completion of HUBU China's project and SCUT-S-China's innovative ideas on carbon absorption provided us with valuable insights. Their work show us how can a project find its economical potential. Leading to our exploration in commercialization. (Click to see further works) Also, we were inspired by SCAU-China’s work in connection between modelling and hardware. This help us made a well-cooperated safety system. (See more details in Model & Hardware )
11th CCiC
Build: Prepared detailed experiment demonstrations and a PowerPoint presentation.
Test: Expert reviews and team discussions validated our experimental design.
Learn: Through this discussion and our face-to-face communication with Professor Zhang, we confirmed the necessity of designing a suicide switch and a biosafety chamber. We start to focus on the laws and regulations to make our project extremely safe (See more details in Safety ).
CCiC Workshop with East China Institute of Biotechnology,Peking University
Build: We aimed to engage in a collaborative brainstorming session during the CCiC workshop.
Test: Through active participation in their respective groups, our members shared ideas and engaged with experts, receiving real-time feedback from the prominent judges. Each group tackled unique challenges related to synthetic biology.
Learn: Genuine needs drive market potential. Our project addresses urgent demands, helping stakeholders quickly understand our initiative. The judges in this workshop appreciated our efforts in finding a cheap method of formic acid detection (See more details in Experiment ).
Global communication
Build: Prepared lectures and interactive sessions showcasing project progress. Design interesting experiments.
Test: Gathered carbon footprint from global youth and their understanding of climate change.
Learn:
Global friends are willing to participate in climate discussion.
Their passion inspire us to learn more in global cooperation in climate action.
(See more details in
SDG
)
Also, during our experiment in coral reefs in a more acid ocean is questioned, since CA lead to
acidification.
We choose co-culturing with Shewanella to solve this problem.
(See more details in
Design)
2nd iGBA Forum
Build: Organized cross-team discussions on the application of carbon capture technologies.
Test: Focus on the potential of our project in industrialization.
Learn: It’s not easy for a premature project to gain investment. We should make it more professional and mature. Our hardware (2nd version) is innovative but hard to product, said by company attended. (See more details in Hardware )
Stage 3: Professional Exchange and Collaboration
Design: In the third phase, we aim to evaluate our project through discussions with professionals to help us make improvements.
Discussion with Du Xuan on Carbon Accounting Methods and Market
Build: We got connection with our senior sister Xuan Du, who is now a expertise in carbon accounting.
Test: We had a online meeting with Xuan Du and asking some questions of carbon market. Also, we made a brief pre and invite her to evaluate our program economically.
Learn: We got clear picture of carbon market and how the carbon is calculated. This helps us to find out the carbon budget in our program from individual action to a industry. (As shown in the picture)
Synthetic Biology Ethics Collaboration
Build: Led by Jilin University's China-Japan Union Hospital, we collaborated with several iGEM teams to co-write a book on the ethics of synthetic biology.
Test: We shared our opinions in this great discussion.
Learn: Ethics safety is also a part of project safety. Thoroughly completing the project's safety design helps alleviate public concerns about the ethics of synthetic biology. (See more details in Safety ).
Hainan Guangji Village Research and Outreach
Build: Guangji is a small village but the head of this village is a professor major in marine science from Hainan University. We want to share our ideas and do some survey.
Test: We discuss with the teenagers in that village about what they now about climate change. Also, we had a face-to-face talk with the village head to see how can science benefit people practically. For villagers living beside the sea, they understood environment protection from ancient folk and daily routines. Leading them scientifically can easily realize win-win for climate and villagers.
Learn: We should start locally, assess the situation, and establish a promotion process before expanding the project's scope. We started sampling locally first the result if shown in modelling work. (See more details in Model )
State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea
Build: Collaborated with professors from the South China Sea National Key Laboratory.
Test: Gained suggestions for experiment optimization and new methods through technical discussions.
Learn: Learned about how environmental conditions affect microbial applications. Appreciated the feasibility of our project.
Seafood Market Research
Build: Conducted a team visit to the largest local seafood market to research where chitin goes after market operations.
Test: Talking with the seafood keeper about how they deal with the residues.
Learn: The seafood market is a extinct source of chitin output caused by human activities. We found that chitin has low economic value and incurs minimal costs for carbon sequestration. Fits our idea of organic-inorganic matter co-precipitation well.
Summary
Through these diverse offline activities, we completed the "Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL)" cycle. The feedback ensured the feasibility and potential of our electrolysis carbon sink technology on technical, social, and economic levels.
These activities made our iHP not just a collection point for external feedback but also a crucial driving force in the continuous iteration and refinement of the project.
Reflections and Thoughts
During the project's progress, we summarized the three most valuable suggestions, hoping to assist other teams in their iHP activities.
Point 1
- Feedback: When collecting feedback, it's crucial to discern the reliability and rationality of the responses.
- Example: We combined “screening questions” and “research questions” in our survey to gather feedback from selected stakeholders, improving response validity and reliability.
Point 2
- Interactivity: Interactive activities expand stakeholder engagement and deepen communication.
- Example: Board games help stakeholders quickly grasp the carbon market and the impacts of carbon trading.
Point 3
- Information Sharing within the Team: Efficient information sharing within the team promotes overall progress.
- Example: Weekly meetings help us share insights from HP activities, fostering project advancement.
Point 4
- Considering Project Costs: Reducing project costs while minimizing output losses is essential.
- Example: Initially, we chose various organic materials for co-precipitation to enhance carbon sinks. Research from SZU-China revealed the low economic value of calcium carbonate minerals, prompting us to explore ways to reduce secondary costs.