To further investigate
the optimal amounts and timing for combining the two recombinant enzymes, we used commercially available
cane juice as the sample. We utilized triangular flasks as containers and incrementally added specific
amounts of the two enzyme solutions (1 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg). The reactions were conducted
at 37°C, and samples were taken at set intervals (5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min). After the
reaction, samples were heated to 65°C to inactivate the enzymes. Subsequently, the changes in the
contents of sucrose and D-glucose were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC).
Table 1: Sucrose (g) vs. Time (min) and
Composite Enzyme (mg) Experimental Results
Time
Enzyme
|
5min
|
10min
|
15min
|
30min
|
60min
|
1mg
|
0.76g
|
0.74g
|
0.72g
|
0.71g
|
0.24g
|
5mg
|
0.53g
|
0.43g
|
0.41g
|
0.42g
|
0.41g
|
10mg
|
0.5g
|
0.42g
|
0.089g
|
0.473g
|
0.436666667g
|
15mg
|
0.39g
|
0.40g
|
0.42g
|
0.44g
|
0.39g
|
20mg
|
0.3833g
|
0.4467g
|
0.4033g
|
0.35g
|
0.003333333g
|
Table 2: Glucose(g) vs. Time (min) and
Composite Enzyme(mg) Experimental Results
Time
Enzyme
|
5min
|
10min
|
15min
|
30min
|
60min
|
1mg
|
2.4g
|
2.5g
|
2.8g
|
2.8g
|
3.3667g
|
5mg
|
2.5g
|
2.5667g
|
2.4g
|
2.8667g
|
3.9g
|
10mg
|
2.6667g
|
2.6333g
|
2.6333g
|
2.6667g
|
2.7333g
|
15mg
|
2.2667g
|
2.5g
|
2.4667g
|
2.7g
|
2.6667g
|
20mg
|
2.5667g
|
2.4667g
|
2.5g
|
2.5g
|
2.9333g
|
3.1 Sucrose Data -
Normality Test
First, we conducted
normality tests on the measured sucrose variation data using the Shapiro-Wilk test (for small sample
sizes, generally less than 5000) or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (for large sample sizes, usually greater
than 5000) to assess significance. If the results do not show significance (P > 0.05), it indicates
that the data follow a normal distribution; otherwise, it suggests a non-normal distribution. In
practical research, meeting the normality assumption is often challenging. However, suppose the absolute
kurtosis values are less than 10 and skewness is less than 3, along with normal distribution histograms,
P-P plots, or Q-Q plots. In that case, the data can be described as approximately usual.
Table 3 presents
descriptive statistics and results from the normality tests for the sucrose data collected at 5 min, 10
min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min. This includes median, mean, and other statistics used to assess
normality.
For the samples at 5
min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min (N < 5000), the Shapiro-Wilk test was applied, yielding significance
P-values of 0.244, 0.391, 0.186, and 0.140, respectively. None of these values show significance,
allowing us to fail to reject the null hypothesis; therefore, the data satisfy the normal distribution
assumption.
For the 10-minute sample
(N < 5000), the Shapiro-Wilk test resulted in a significant P-value of 0.005***, leading us to reject
the null hypothesis; hence, this data does not meet the average distribution criterion. Its kurtosis
(4.687) has an absolute value of less than 10, and its skewness (2.146) has an absolute value of less
than 3, which allows for further analysis using normal distribution histograms.
Table 3:
Descriptive Statistics and Normality Test Results for Sucrose
Variable Name
|
Sample Size
|
Median
|
Mean
|
Standard Deviation
|
Skewness
|
Kurtosis
|
S-W
Test (P-value)
|
K-S
Test (P-value)
|
5min
|
5
|
0.5
|
0.513
|
0.153
|
1.299
|
1.739
|
0.864(0.244)
|
0.255(0.829)
|
10min
|
5
|
0.43
|
0.487
|
0.143
|
2.146
|
4.687
|
0.675(0.005***)
|
0.41(0.282)
|
15min
|
5
|
0.41
|
0.408
|
0.223
|
-0.074
|
1.994
|
0.897(0.391)
|
0.292(0.695)
|
30min
|
5
|
0.44
|
0.479
|
0.137
|
1.62
|
3.197
|
0.847(0.186)
|
0.316(0.603)
|
60min
|
5
|
0.39
|
0.296
|
0.181
|
-1.426
|
1.39
|
0.83(0.140)
|
0.299(0.669)
|
Note:
Significance levels are indicated as follows: *** (1%), ** (5%), * (10%).
|
Figure 1 displays the
histogram of sucrose data variation at the 5 min mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape
(high in the middle and low at both ends). In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be
perfectly normal, it can be generally accepted as approximately usual.
Figure
1. Normality Test Histogram of Sucrose Data at 5 Minutes
Figure 2 displays the
histogram of sucrose data variation at the 10 min mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape
(high in the middle and low at both ends). In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be
perfectly normal, it can be generally accepted as approximately usual.
Figure
2. Normality Test Histogram of Sucrose Data at 10 Minutes
Figure 3 displays the
histogram of sucrose data variation at the 15 min mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape
(high in the middle and low at both ends). In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be
perfectly normal, it can be generally accepted as approximately usual.
Figure
3. Normality Test Histogram of Sucrose Data at 15 Minutes
Figure 4 displays the
histogram of sucrose data variation at the 30-minute mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape
(high in the middle and low at both ends). In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be
perfectly normal, it can be generally accepted as approximately usual.
Figure
4. Normality Test Histogram of Sucrose Data at 30 Minutes
Figure 5 displays the
histogram of sucrose data variation at the 60-minute mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape
(high in the middle and low at both ends). In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be
perfectly normal, it can be generally accepted as approximately usual.
Figure
5. Normality Test Histogram of Sucrose Data at 60 Minutes
3.2 Glucose Data -
Normality Test
We first performed
normality tests on the measured glucose variation data using the Shapiro-Wilk test (for small sample
sizes, generally less than 5000) or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (for large sample sizes, usually greater
than 5000) to assess significance. If the results do not show significance (P > 0.05), it indicates
that the data follow a normal distribution; otherwise, it suggests a non-normal distribution. In
practical research, meeting the normality assumption is often challenging. However, if the absolute
kurtosis values are less than 10 and skewness is less than 3, along with average distribution
histograms, the data can be described as approximately usual.
Table 4 presents
descriptive statistics and results from the normality tests for the glucose data collected at 5 min, 10
min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min. This includes median, mean, and other statistics used to assess
normality.
For the samples at 5
min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, and 60 min (N < 5000), the Shapiro-Wilk test was applied, yielding
significance P-values of 0.978, 0.440, 0.587, 0.859, and 0.373, respectively. None of these values show
significance, allowing us to fail to reject the null hypothesis; therefore, the data satisfy the
standard distribution assumption.
Table 4: Descriptive Statistics and
Normality Test Results for Glucose
Variable Name
|
Sample Size
|
Median
|
Mean
|
Standard Deviation
|
Skewness
|
Kurtosis
|
S-W
Test (P-value)
|
K-S
Test (P-value)
|
5min
|
5
|
2.5
|
2.48
|
0.154
|
-0.35
|
-0.45
|
0.99(0.978)
|
0.152(0.999)
|
10min
|
5
|
2.5
|
2.533
|
0.067
|
0.938
|
-0.187
|
0.905(0.440)
|
0.291(0.697)
|
15min
|
5
|
2.5
|
2.56
|
0.159
|
0.946
|
0.038
|
0.929(0.587)
|
0.247(0.853)
|
30min
|
5
|
2.7
|
2.707
|
0.14
|
-0.602
|
0.267
|
0.968(0.859)
|
0.188(0.980)
|
60min
|
5
|
2.933
|
3.12
|
0.515
|
1.016
|
-0.161
|
0.893(0.373)
|
0.242(0.870)
|
Note:
Significance levels are indicated as follows: *** (1%), ** (5%), * (10%).
|
Figure 6 displays the
histogram of glucose data variation at
the 5 min mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape (high in the middle and low at both
ends). In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be perfectly normal, it can generally
be accepted as approximately usual.
Figure 6. Normality Test Histogram of Glucose Data
at 5
Minutes
Figure 7 displays the histogram of glucose data
variation at the
10 min mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape (high in the middle and low at both ends). In
that case, it indicates that while the data may not be perfectly normal, it can generally be accepted as
approximately usual.
Figure 7. Normality Test Histogram of Glucose Data
at 10
Minutes
Figure 8 displays the histogram of glucose data
variation at the
15 min mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape (high in the middle and low at both ends). In
that case, it indicates that while the data may not be perfectly normal, it can generally be accepted as
approximately usual.
Figure 8. Normality Test Histogram of Glucose Data
at 15
Minutes
Figure 9 displays the histogram of glucose data
variation at the
30-minute mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape (high in the middle and low at both ends).
In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be perfectly normal, it can generally be accepted
as approximately usual.
Figure 9. Normality Test Histogram of Glucose Data
at 30
Minutes
Figure 10 displays the histogram of glucose data
variation at the
60-minute mark. Suppose the histogram resembles a bell shape (high in the middle and low at both ends).
In that case, it indicates that while the data may not be perfectly normal, it can generally be accepted
as approximately usual.
Figure 10. Normality Test Histogram of Glucose Data
at 60
Minutes
We used MATLAB
software
to perform three-dimensional visualization of the processed data and established functions to plot
three-dimensional graphs. We also solved for the optimal solutions of the model and determined the
extrema of the functions.
4.1 Sucrose Modeling
Analysis
4.1.1 Fitting the
Raw
Sucrose Data
In this section, we
fitted the raw sucrose data to determine the relationship between the variables. This process included
selecting appropriate mathematical models, applying regression techniques, and analyzing the goodness of
fit to ensure that the model accurately represents the observed data.
clear;clc;
x=[1 5 10 15 20];
y=[5 10 15 30 60];
z=[0.76 0.74 0.72 0.71 0.24;
0.53 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.41;
0.5 0.42 0.089 0.473333333
0.436666667;
0.39 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.39;
0.383333333 0.446666667 0.403333333 0.35
0.003333333];
%function [fitresult, gof] = createFit(x, y,
z)
%CREATEFIT(X,Y,Z)
% Create a fit.
% Data for 'untitled fit 1' fit:
%
X Input : x
%
Y Input : y
%
Z Output: z
% Output:
%
fitresult : a fit object representing
the
fit.
%
gof : structure with goodness-of fit
info.
% Fit: 'untitled fit 1'.
[xData, yData, zData] = prepareSurfaceData( x,
y,
z );
% Set up fittype and options.
ft = 'thinplateinterp';
% Fit model to data.
[fitresult, gof] = fit( [xData, yData], zData,
ft,
'Normalize', 'on' );
% Plot fit with data.
figure( 'Name', 'untitled fit 1' );
h = plot( fitresult, [xData, yData], zData
);
legend( h, 'untitled fit 1', 'z vs. x, y',
'Location', 'NorthEast' );
% Label axes
xlabel x
ylabel y
zlabel z
grid on
view( -41.1, 28.8 );
Figure 11. Three-Dimensional Plot
of
Sucrose Content Variation
4.1.2
Solving for the Optimal Value of the Model
Based
on the calculations, when the amount of composite enzyme is set to 10 mg and the digestion time is 48
minutes, the model computes a minimum negative value. Considering the practical context, we take this
value as 0 g. Therefore, the sucrose is completely digested when the composite enzyme amount is 10 mg
and the digestion time is 48 minutes.
The code used for
this
optimization is as follows:
clear;clc;
x=[1 5 10 15
20];
y=[5 10 15 30
60];
z=[0.76 0.74 0.72 0.71
0.24;
0.53 0.43 0.41 0.42 0.41;
0.5 0.42 0.089 0.473333333 0.436666667;
0.39 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.39;
0.383333333 0.446666667 0.403333333 0.35
0.003333333];
xx=[1:0.5:20];
yy=[5:1:60];
[xi,yi]=meshgrid(xx,yy);
zi=interp2(x,y,z,xi,yi,'spline');
surf(xi,yi,zi)
[imin,jmin]=find(zi==min(min(zi)))
xmin=xx(jmin),ymin=yy(imin),zmin=zi(imin,jmin)
[imax,jmax]=find(zi==max(max(zi)));
xmax=xx(jmax),ymax=yy(imax),zmax=zi(imax,jmax)
4.2 Glucose Modeling
Analysis
4.2.1 Fitting the
Raw
Glucose Data
This section will
fit
the raw glucose data to identify the underlying relationships between the variables involved. This
process will involve selecting suitable mathematical models, applying regression techniques, and
evaluating the goodness of fit to ensure the model accurately represents the observed glucose
data.
clear;clc;
x=[1 5 10 15 20];
y=[5 10 15 30 60];
z=[2.4 2.5 2.8 2.8 3.366666667;
2.5 2.566666667 2.4 2.866666667 3.9;
2.666666667 2.633333333 2.633333333 2.666666667
2.733333333;
2.266666667 2.5 2.466666667 2.7 2.666666667;
2.566666667 2.466666667 2.5 2.5
2.933333333];
%function [fitresult, gof] = createFit(x, y,
z)
%CREATEFIT(X,Y,Z)
% Create a fit.
% Data for 'untitled fit 1' fit:
%
X Input : x
%
Y Input : y
%
Z Output: z
% Output:
%
fitresult : a fit object representing
the
fit.
%
gof : structure with goodness-of fit
info.
%% Fit: 'untitled fit 1'.
[xData, yData, zData] = prepareSurfaceData( x,
y,
z );
% Set up fittype and options.
ft = 'thinplateinterp';
% Fit model to data.
[fitresult, gof] = fit( [xData, yData], zData,
ft,
'Normalize', 'on' );
% Plot fit with data.
figure( 'Name', 'untitled fit 1' );
h = plot( fitresult, [xData, yData], zData
);
legend( h, 'untitled fit 1', 'z vs. x, y',
'Location', 'NorthEast' );
% Label axes
xlabel x
ylabel y
zlabel z
grid on
view( -37.3, 8.5 );
Figure 12. Three-Dimensional Plot
of
Glucose Content Variation
4.2.2 Solving for
the
Optimal Solution of the Model
Based on the
calculations, when the amount of composite enzyme is set to 1 mg and the digestion time is 46 minutes,
the model computes a minimum value of 1.6318 g. This indicates that the addition of the composite enzyme
indeed promotes glucose production.
Furthermore, when
the
enzyme amount is increased to 10 mg and the digestion time is set to 49 minutes, the model calculates a
maximum value of 5.0486 g. Consequently, when the composite enzyme amount is set to 20 mg with the same
digestion time of 49 minutes, the maximum glucose produced from degradation reaches 5.0486 g, while the
remaining sucrose is converted into dietary fiber.
We utilized
sugarcane
juice as a model food suspension to test the functionality of composite enzymes under real conditions.
By analyzing the raw data and three-dimensional plots, we can conclude that, generally, a longer
reaction time leads to more complete catalysis, resulting in higher glucose concentrations and lower
sucrose concentrations.
Specifically, with a
composite enzyme amount of 10-20 mg and a digestion time of approximately 50 minutes, the residual
sucrose concentration in the solution approaches 0 g, while the resulting glucose concentration is
notably high, around 5.0486 g. The calculated results from the model align well with the actual measured
data, confirming that the dextransucrase and inulosucrase break down sucrose into dextran and
oligofructose (i.e., glucose).
This demonstrates
the
potential of these enzymes in enhancing sugar processing and improving nutritional outcomes in food
applications.