Description
Why choosing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as our project?
Overview of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been sporadically observed since ancient times, and has emerged as a growing problem in industrialized nations. Since the middle of the twentieth century, the incidence of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease has increased in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. At the turn of the twenty-first century, the overall incidence of IBD plateaued in certain regions of the Western world, whereas IBD in specific populations (for example, paediatric-onset IBD) continued to show a rise in incidence [1]. IBD has affected approximately 2 million people in North America and Europe, and the incidence continues to increase [2]. Similarly, the incidence rate of IBD has also increased in China and other Asian countries in recent decades [3].

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has a profound impact on patients and society as a whole. The chronic and unpredictable nature of the condition can lead to significant physical and emotional distress, affecting every aspect of a patient's life. The symptoms of IBD, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fatigue, can be debilitating, making it difficult for individuals to maintain their daily routines, work, or participate in social activities [1,4,5]. Moreover, the emotional toll of IBD can be overwhelming, leading to anxiety, depression, and feelings of isolation [4,5].

Beyond the individual level, IBD also has substantial economic and societal implications. The disease is associated with significant healthcare costs, lost productivity, and absenteeism, resulting in a substantial economic burden on patients, families, and society. In the United States alone, the annual direct and indirect costs of IBD are estimated to be over $12 billion [1]. Furthermore, IBD can limit educational and career opportunities, leading to a long-term impact on personal and professional development.

Additionally, IBD can also have a profound impact on families and caregivers, who often take on a significant emotional and financial burden in supporting their loved ones.

Current treatments And Key Challenges

New therapeutic strategies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have shifted from symptom control towards treat-to-target algorithms in order to optimize treatment results. The treatment of IBD has evolved with the development of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-α), such as infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol, which were introduced in the late 1990s to induce and maintain remission [6,7,8], beyond the conventional therapies. However, in spite of their long-term effectiveness, almost two thirds of patients do not respond to or cannot sustain treatment with these drugs, which have various side effects.

The key challenges in the current treatment of IBD include limited treatment efficacy, risk of relapse,and heterogeneity in treatment response and individualized needs. These issues highlight the need for further research and the development of more effective and safer therapeutic strategies for IBD.

New mechanisms of action and innovative therapies, such as modulating the gut microbiome and targeting specific immune pathways, should be explored, while evaluating the synergistic effects of various interventions to seek the optimal combination.

Engineered biological systems are currently being developed that use synthetic genetic circuits to generate a wide variety of biological behaviors. Intelligent biosensors developed via synthetic biology show a promising noninvasive strategy and has been used as a diagnostic tool for sensing disease biomarkers in the gut[9,10,11,12]. Bacterial sensors based on two-component systems, ThsS/R, have been constructed in Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) to sense and respond to thiosulfate, which are promising biomarkers of gut inflammation.[13] What's more, we describe the construction and testing of another synthetic genetic circuit capable of detecting and responding to nitric oxide, an important marker of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Thus, this biosensor can be used to diagnose colonic inflammation.

Herein, we developed a high-sensitive biomarker-responsive probiotic system to diagnose and treat IBD.

Mode:

About our project
Our project goal

The ultimate goal of our project is to design an effective whole-cell probiotic system to diagnose and treat inflammatory bowel disease

Our project design

Overview

Figure 1. About our our system

We developed a whole-cell engineered bacteria, based on the integration of three modules (inflammatory reporting, drug secretion and safety module) to simultaneously diagnose and ameliorate inflammatory bowel disease(Figure 1).

The diagnosis and therapy part

Figure2. A brief overview of the diagnosis and therapy part

Figure3.How does our diagnosis part work

Studies have shown that sulfate‐reducing bacteria (SRB) present in the colon produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from oxidized sulfur species derived from the host and diet, which is a process that has been suggested to be involved in colitis [14]. Host enzymes detoxify H2S to thiosulfate. And by using a Salmonella typhimurium mouse model Winter and colleagues have shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by the host during inflammation convert thiosulfate to tetrathionate, which this pathogen consumes to establish a foothold for infection [15]. A two-component system, ThsS/R, have been constructed in Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) as an ideal system to sense and respond to thiosulfate, which is a promising biomarker of gut inflammation.[16]

Therefore, we have designed a biotherapeutic strain of engineered probiotics specifically for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Figure 2), which possesses two key molecules, ThsS and ThsR, forming a high-efficiency signaling network to precisely recognize and respond to excessive amounts of thiosulfate, a key biomarker in the gut of IBD patients through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation [18,19].

Considering levels of many disease-related biomarkers are dynamic and difficult to capture and monitor in native environments, we added a CRISPR-based genome editing system that based on the second-generation base editor (CBE) to amplify the inflammatory signal reaction. In this added system, the promoter of drug protein was replaced with a CBE-editable ACG-tag sequence, which silenced the translation of our drug protein. CBE was expressed from PphsA to respond to thiosulfate levels in native environment. In the presence of thiosulfate, BE2 edited the ACG-tag sequence to ATG (molecular recording), which activated the translation of drug protein (Figure 3).

Once sulfide is detected, ThsS undergoes rapid phosphorylation, which in turn activates ThsR. This cascade of biochemical reactions triggers the transcription of downstream genes, including the AvCystatin protein from the parasite. AvCystatin plays a crucial role in regulating macrophage immune responses, activating cellular MAP kinase and inducing the expression of IL-10 and IL-12/23p40, thereby effectively alleviating gut inflammation [17,19].

The suicide part

Figure 4. How does our suicide part work

We then added a ‘suicide switch’ into our system to control drug expression (Figure 4). As the patient's symptoms gradually improve, the level of nitric oxide, which has been proved to be another promising biomarker of IBD [20], in the gut decreases. Then, the "suicide switch" within the probiotic is activated [18,19]. The PnorV promoter is inhibited, controlling the expression of CI protein, while the PL promoter is derepressed, inducing the expression of the MazF toxin protein [21]. As a toxin protein, MazF cleaves RNA to block protein synthesis, ultimately leading to the self-apoptosis of the probiotic cells. Moreover, MazF imparts resistance to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in primate and human T cells without affecting normal cell growth, demonstrating its potential for in vivo applications [22,23].

Reference

[1] Kaplan GG. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Dec;12(12):720-7. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.150. Epub 2015 Sep 1. PMID: 26323879.

[2] Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, Underwood FE, Tang W, Benchimol EI, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2017 Dec 23;390(10114):2769-2778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0. Epub 2017 Oct 16. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):e56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32028-6. PMID: 29050646.

[3] Chen Y. Perspectives of IBD China: Is Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Model a Solution to Health Care Issues for the Country? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 Apr 23;24(5):925-929. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy056. PMID: 29688396.

[4] Choi CR, Bakir IA, Hart AL, Graham TA. Clonal evolution of colorectal cancer in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;14(4):218-229. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.1. Epub 2017 Feb 8. PMID: 28174420.

[5] Karpin J, Rodriguez TG, Traboulsi C, Rai V, Gibbons RD, Rubin DT. Assessment of Comorbid Depression and Anxiety in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Using Adaptive Testing Technology. Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Jan;3(1):otaa095. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otaa095. Epub 2021 Feb 6. PMID: 34746788; PMCID: PMC8570563.

[6] Moss AC, Farrell RJ. Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2006 Nov;131(5):1649-51; discussion 1651. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.039. PMID: 17067595.

[7] Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Hommes DW, D'Haens G, Hanauer S, Schreiber S, Panaccione R, Fedorak RN, Tighe MB, Huang B, Kampman W, Lazar A, Thakkar R. Adalimumab for induction of clinical remission in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2011 Jun;60(6):780-7. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.221127. Epub 2011 Jan 5. PMID: 21209123.

[8] Warner B, Harris AW. Adalimumab induces and maintains clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2012 Jul;143(1):e42; author reply e42. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.03.055. Epub 2012 May 24. PMID: 22634354.

[9] Levskaya A, Chevalier AA, Tabor JJ, Simpson ZB, Lavery LA, Levy M, Davidson EA, Scouras A, Ellington AD, Marcotte EM, Voigt CA. Synthetic biology: engineering Escherichia coli to see light. Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):441-2. doi: 10.1038/nature04405. PMID: 16306980.

[10] Riglar DT, Silver PA. Engineering bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Apr;16(4):214-225. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.172. Epub 2018 Feb 5. PMID: 29398705.

[11] Landry BP, Tabor JJ. Engineering Diagnostic and Therapeutic Gut Bacteria. Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Oct;5(5). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.BAD-0020-2017. PMID: 29052539.

[12] Mays ZJ, Nair NU. Synthetic biology in probiotic lactic acid bacteria: At the frontier of living therapeutics. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018 Oct;53:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Mar 15. PMID: 29550614; PMCID: PMC6139064.

[13] Daeffler KN, Galley JD, Sheth RU, Ortiz-Velez LC, Bibb CO, Shroyer NF, Britton RA, Tabor JJ. Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Apr 3;13(4):923. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167416. PMID: 28373240; PMCID: PMC5408782.

[14] Blachier F, Davila AM, Mimoun S, Benetti PH, Atanasiu C, Andriamihaja M, Benamouzig R, Bouillaud F, Tomé D. Luminal sulfide and large intestine mucosa: friend or foe? Amino Acids. 2010 Jul;39(2):335-47. doi: 10.1007/s00726-009-0445-2. Epub 2009 Dec 18. PMID: 20020161.

[15] Winter SE, Thiennimitr P, Winter MG, Butler BP, Huseby DL, Crawford RW, Russell JM, Bevins CL, Adams LG, Tsolis RM, Roth JR, Bäumler AJ. Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature. 2010 Sep 23;467(7314):426-9. doi: 10.1038/nature09415. PMID: 20864996; PMCID: PMC2946174.

[16] Daeffler KN, Galley JD, Sheth RU, Ortiz-Velez LC, Bibb CO, Shroyer NF, Britton RA, Tabor JJ. Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Apr 3;13(4):923. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167416. PMID: 28373240; PMCID: PMC5408782.

[17] Daeffler KN, Galley JD, Sheth RU, Ortiz-Velez LC, Bibb CO, Shroyer NF, Britton RA, Tabor JJ. Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Apr 3;13(4):923. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167416. PMID: 28373240; PMCID: PMC5408782.

[18] Zou ZP, Du Y, Fang TT, Zhou Y, Ye BC. Biomarker-responsive engineered probiotic diagnoses, records, and ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2023 Feb 8;31(2):199-212.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 27. PMID: 36758520.

[19] Archer EJ, Robinson AB, Süel GM. Engineered E. coli that detect and respond to gut inflammation through nitric oxide sensing. ACS Synth Biol. 2012 Oct 19;1(10):451-7. doi: 10.1021/sb3000595. Epub 2012 Aug 21. PMID: 23656184.

[20] Kimura H, Miura S, Shigematsu T, Ohkubo N, Tsuzuki Y, Kurose I, Higuchi H, Akiba Y, Hokari R, Hirokawa M, Serizawa H, Ishii H. Increased nitric oxide production and inducible nitric oxide synthase activity in colonic mucosa of patients with active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 May;42(5):1047-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1018849405922. PMID: 9149061.

[21] Park JH, Yoshizumi S, Yamaguchi Y, Wu KP, Inouye M. ACA-specific RNA sequence recognition is acquired via the loop 2 region of MazF mRNA interferase. Proteins. 2013 May;81(5):874-83. doi: 10.1002/prot.24246. Epub 2013 Feb 25. PMID: 23280569; PMCID: PMC3618565.

[22] Saito N, Chono H, Shibata H, Ageyama N, Yasutomi Y, Mineno J. CD4(+) T Cells Modified by the Endoribonuclease MazF Are Safe and Can Persist in SHIV-infected Rhesus Macaques. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014 Jun 10;3(6):e168. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2014.20. PMID: 24914931; PMCID: PMC4078760.

[23] Jacobson JM, Jadlowsky JK, Lacey SF, Fraietta JA, Plesa G, Chono H, Lee DH, Kulikovskaya I, Bartoszek C, Chen F, Tian L, Dimitri A, Levine BL, Veloso EA, Hwang WT, June CH. Autologous CD4 T Lymphocytes Modified with a Tat-Dependent, Virus-Specific Endoribonuclease Gene in HIV-Infected Individuals. Mol Ther. 2021 Feb 3;29(2):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 11. PMID: 33186691; PMCID: PMC7854306.

Back to Top