For the final application of our project, we envision a probiotic which people can consume which will produce pancreatic digestive enzymes and secrete them into the pancreas. However, attempting to create recombinant proteins inside cells intended for human digestion comes with inherent risks. If the bacteria survived the intestinal tract and excretion, then we would have just released a novel, modified bacteria into the environment with unintended impacts. Our modified bacteria could potentially participate in horizontal gene transfer or disrupt local ecosystems. Additionally, we want to minimize any possible risk by choosing a non-pathogenic chassis and using proper safety precautions when handling bacteria. As such, we have implemented multiple features to ensure safety for researchers manufacturing our device, consumers, and the environment.
When designing and constructing the parts of our device, we prioritized safety in our protocols and practices. Researchers wore latex gloves when working with E. coli and B. subtilis. All lab spaces and equipment were wiped down with ethanol immediately before and after experimentation to prevent contamination. Any used plates, gloves, pipette tips and wipes were properly disposed of in biological hazard containers. Our lab is equipped with features which protect researchers experimenting with the parts we have designed. This includes multiple specific waste disposal bins, a regularly checked fire extinguisher, and fire sprinklers, an AED, and a first-aid kit. A fire evacuation plan was discussed and is displayed in case of a fire emergency. Because our lab generated chemical and biological waste, we took the necessary precautions to prevent contaminating our facilities or the outside environment. We exercised the appropriate waste disposal guidelines outlined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) [1]
We chose a non-pathogenic chassis for our device. Bacillus subtilis is a benign organism that is not considered pathogenic or toxigenic to humans, animals, or plants [2]. All of the DNA used within the parts is native to B. subtilis or Homo sapiens. No risks were identified in association with the genes corresponding to these proteins related to mutation, overexpression, or underexpression. Therefore, none of the parts utilized in construction of our device present any risk to humans and potential patients consuming our device. To contain our device to the desired environments, additional features were designed for our device in the form of the dual control kill-switch.
We designed a dual control safety mechanism using a toxin/antitoxin system that prevents the bacteria from surviving if excreted from the body. Since B. subtilis thrives in soil [3], this biocontainment mechanism minimizes the risk of environmental contamination. The bacteria will only live in physiological temperatures or if the sugar molecule xylose is present. Our mechanism was inspired by the 2023 NMU-China team’s MazE/MazF kill-switch, which was dependent on rhamnose and temperature [4].
The following circuit diagrams depict our design for the biocontainment mechanism.
Figure 1. Circuit diagrams depicting the individual parts and construct for the biocontainment mechanism.
The table below shows the condition of the bacteria in different locations. Our switch ensures that the bacteria are alive while being transported in a xylose-containing yogurt. Xylose is a natural sugar that is safe to consume but is not as common in the environment as glucose. When the yogurt is ingested and the bacteria passes through the stomach, it is in the presence of both xylose and the physiological body temperature of 37°C, so it will also survive. When traveling through the intestines, there will be no more xylose present, but the temperature will still be appropriate to keep the bacteria alive. When excreted, however, both xylose and physiological body temperature are absent, and the bacteria is not viable.
Location | Xylose Present | Temperature (°C) | Condition |
---|---|---|---|
Transport (in yogurt) | Yes | <37 | Alive |
In stomach | Yes | ≥ 37 | Alive |
In intestines | No | ≥ 37 | Alive |
Excreted from the body | No | <37 | Dead |
Table 1. Table showing the possible environmental conditions and outcomes for the engineered bacteria.
We initially planned to construct our biocontainment switch using traditional assembly methods. However, due to an oversight during parts design, along with obstacles with ligation, we were experimentally unable to perform this assembly successfully.
We designed primers to attach Gibson sequences to our biocontainment-switch using PCR. We successfully performed PCR and were able to attach these Gibson sequences to the ends of our parts. We are currently in the process of preparing for Gibson assembly.
We plan to test our biocontainment mechanism using a viability assay. Our cells will be placed in the four environments as described in Table 1, and their condition will be measured using a cell-staining viability assay.
[1] Title 40 of the CFR -- Protection of Environment. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40 (accessed 2024-10-01).
[2] Fra009.Pdf. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/fra009.pdf (accessed 2024-09-18).
[3] Mahapatra, S.; Yadav, R.; Ramakrishna, W. Bacillus Subtilis Impact on Plant Growth, Soil Health and Environment: Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. J Appl Microbiol .https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15480.
[4] Ghodeif, A. O.; Azer, S. A. Pancreatic Insufficiency. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island (FL), 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555926/.
[5] Part:BBa K143014 - parts.igem.org. https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K143014 (accessed 2024-10-01).
[6] Part:BBa K090505 - parts.igem.org. https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K090505 (accessed 2024-10-01).
[7] Moore, L. R.; Caspi, R.; Campbell, D. A.; Casey, J. R.; Crevecoeur, S.; Lea-Smith, D. J.; Long, B.; Omar, N. M.; Paley, S. M.; Schmelling, N. M.; Torrado, A.; Zehr, J. P.; Karp, P. D. CyanoCyc Cyanobacterial Web Portal. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1340413. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1340413.
[8] Castillo-Hair, S. M.; Fujita, M.; Igoshin, O. A.; Tabor, J. J. An Engineered B. Subtilis Inducible Promoter System with over 10 000-Fold Dynamic Range. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8 (7), 1673–1678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.8b00469.
[9] Part:BBa K3247005 - parts.igem.org. https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3247005 (accessed 2024-10-01).
[10] Pellegrini, O.; Mathy, N.; Gogos, A.; Shapiro, L.; Condon, C. The Bacillus Subtilis ydcDE Operon Encodes an Endoribonuclease of the MazF/PemK Family and Its Inhibitor. Molecular Microbiology 2005, 56 (5), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04606.x.
[11] Roux, S.; Hallam, S. J.; Woyke, T.; Sullivan, M. B. Data from: Viral Dark Matter and Virus–Host Interactions Resolved from Publicly Available Microbial Genomes, 2015, 254533367 bytes. https://doi.org/10.5061/DRYAD.B8226.