Describe all the safety issues of your project.
The Nanyang Technological University (NTU) iGEM team views safety as one of the fundamental aspects towards experimental success. Our team is fully compliant with iGEM’s and NTU’s safety regulations – including chemical safety, biological safety, and data protection. Our approach towards safety follows two perspectives – individual and experimental safety.
For more details, please refer to our safety form instead.
Indiviudal safety is further segragated into Individual Safety is further segregated into two categories – personal and laboratory safety.
Personal safety is of utmost importance as it directly protects the individual when he or she is conducting experiments. NTU Occupational Safety and Health (OHS) Management has mandated that all students involved in laboratory research are to complete various comprehensive risk assessment modules before embarking on their projects. This myriad option of modules available equips students with sufficient laboratory safety knowledge, and to conduct experiments in a safe manner. Each module has a 3-year coverage, and covers chemical safety, biological safety, and data protection:
In addition, a risk assessment is required before embarking on a scientific research project. This allows students to identify any potential hazards, evaluate the risks involved, as well as develop additional mitigation steps to minimize the risk associated with any experimental procedures. When the Risk Prioritisation Number (RPN; given as Severity (S) x Likelihood (L)) exceeds a limit, additional risk control detailing the mitigation steps are required.
No. | Work Activity | Hazard | Sub Hazard | Possible Accident/Ill Health & Person-at-Risk | Existing Risk Control | S | L | R | Additional Risk Control | S | L | R | Follow Up by & date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Use of chemicals | Chemical | Corrosive | Eye injuries and skin irritant |
|
2 | 2 | 4 | NA | ||||
Sensitizer or irritant | Burns / scalds |
|
2 | 2 | 4 | NA | |||||||
Poison | Chemical poisoning / absorption of chemicals or hazardous substances |
|
2 | 2 | 4 | NA | |||||||
2 | Use of machines | Electrical | Contact with electrical energy | Electrocution |
|
5 | 1 | 5 | NA | ||||
3 | Working in coldroom | Physical | Extreme weather | Cold temperature environment |
|
4 | 2 | 8 | Users are required to have a buddy system before working in the coldroom. Their buddies should check on them once every hour. | 4 | 2 | 8 | Follow up by CCEB staff. |
The laboratory is also a certified Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2) laboratory that is well-equipped with the appropriate safety features required for the project.
All organisms used in our project are included in iGEM’s White List, ensuring they meet established biosafety standards. No additional check-in forms were required for non-White List organisms or parts, as none were utilized in our work.
Our experimental setup is also designed to minimize the risk of increasing antimicrobial resistance in our organism. The project focuses on exploring T7 RNA polymerase (T7RNAP), an enzyme derived from the T7 bacteriophage1. Previous studies have characterized T7RNAP using an in vivo dual plasmid selection system, where chloramphenicol resistance serves as the readout2,3. In these setups, better-performing T7RNAP variants conferred increased antibiotic resistance to bacteria, enabling them to thrive at elevated chloramphenicol concentrations. Using antibiotic resistance as a qualitative readout accelerates the identification of superior variants, as only bacteria harboring these variants survive under more stringent conditions. However, this approach raises concerns about unintended horizontal gene transfer, which could spread antibiotic resistance to other organisms. Such an event poses a potential biosafety risk, particularly if the organisms are not properly contained or disposed of.
Therefore, to avoid increasing the antibiotic resistance properties of our organism, we designed the experiment to quantify fluorescence intensity instead. Better-performing variants are expected to yield higher fluorescence readouts, enabling us to identify improved variants without relying on antibiotic resistance as a marker. This approach mitigates the risks associated with increased antimicrobial resistance while maintaining the efficiency of identifying superior variants.
1 Borkotoky, S., & Murali, A. (2018). The highly efficient T7 RNA polymerase: A wonder macromolecule in biological realm. International journal of biological macromolecules, 118(Pt A), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.198
2 Ikeda, R. A., Ligman, C. M., & Warshamana, S. (1992). T7 promoter contacts essential for promoter activity in vivo. Nucleic acids research, 20(10), 2517–2524. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.10.2517
3 Boulain, J. C., Dassa, J., Mesta, L., Savatier, A., Costa, N., Muller, B. H., L'hostis, G., Stura, E. A., Troesch, A., & Ducancel, F. (2013). Mutants with higher stability and specific activity from a single thermosensitive variant of T7 RNA polymerase. Protein engineering, design & selection: PEDS, 26(11), 725–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzt040