Description of how and why we chose our iGEM project.
Science and society are constantly striving for innovative, cost-effective tools to improve disease detection and treatment. One area ripe for advancement is the early and localized detection of oxidative stress, which plays a critical role in both plant and human diseases. In agriculture, the lack of timely plant disease detection poses a significant challenge, as pathogens like fireblight in apple and pear trees, Zymoseptoria tritici in wheat, and Xylella fastidiosa in vineyards can cause severe damage before they are noticed, leading to considerable economic losses. Similarly, in human diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompassing Crohn's disease and colitis, elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a key marker of disease progression. This marker, high oxidative stress, could be used as an activating signal in detection and therapy.
By developing cross-species biological sensors for high ROS levels, we can achieve earlier and more precise identification of diseases, improving management strategies in both plant and human health. This technology could significantly enhance disease outcomes and contribute to more sustainable agriculture and medical practices.
1 out of 250 in Switzerland suffer from IBD
4 drug classes just to manage symptoms
50 million CHF in damages in 2007
Only 2 biocontrol products approved in Europe
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive chemical compounds that are natural byproducts of metabolism. They are involved in cell growth, differentiation, signaling as well as immune responses[1]. Low ROS levels are required for proper metabolic function and cell signaling. However, high ROS levels (oxidative stress) can lead to tissue damage through the uncontrolled oxidation of cellular components[2].
In many organisms, ROS levels spike during signaling of cell death, indicating, for example, an infection. Therefore, selective high-ROS sensing, coupled with a localized and timely secretion of antimicrobials, could be used for early pathogen detection and prevention. In animals, high ROS levels are found in vascular, neurodegenerative and malignant diseases, as well as in aging. Keeping ROS at non-toxic levels by coupling sensing and anti-oxidant secretion could reduce the severity of many human diseases like diabetes or Alzheimer's disease[3]. Timely localization and quantification of ROS levels could also allow for targeted therapy[2].
We aim to develop a versatile cross-species high-pass ROS sensor platform, harnessing this disease- side effect as a timely and local marker for various health applications.
A cross-species platform would enable ROS-sensing in many settings. Using microorganisms would allow applications in research and health, microbiota being at the center of many bigger organisms of interest such as humans and plants.
Compatible microbiota agents have been selected for sensor engineering, namely bacteria and
yeast,
which are both naturally part of many bigger organisms. For bacteria, we have engineered
classic E.coli lab strains but also human and plant microbiota strains as they would be
closer to the final recipients of our sensor system for health applications. It is crucial to
already consider strain variation as the oxidative stress sensitivities and reactivities
can
differ significantly[4]. E. coli Nissle 1917 is a well-characterized
and
engineered human microbiota strain[5,6], which we engineered as proof of concept for
medical applications, whereas, for plants, we chose to focus on Pseudomonas alloputida
mt-2 KT2440 and P. protegens Pf5 strains, an oxidative-stress resistant
strain
and a biocontrol lab strains which were accessible to us[7-10].
For yeast, we first focused on making our construct work in the classic S.
cerevisiae lab strain.
We aim to adapt their natural ROS-sensing ability to suit our purpose.
For bacteria, the main native transcription factor OxyR will be tuned as high-pass ROS sensor [11], and, similarly for yeast, Yap1 [12-14]. An alternative eucaryotic ROS-sensitive TF from plants called Tga2 will also be tested in yeast, as it is naturally involved in plant immunity in response to pathogen infections called systemic acquired immunity (SAR) [15,16].
Since the TF is natively expressed (OxyR and Yap1), we chose to focus our strategy on promoter engineering in order to alter TF binding properties and, thus, gene expression[13,20]. To this end, we focused on convenient GFP-reporter vectors adapted for bacterial and yeast expression, in order to be able to assess H2O2 sensitivity of our new constructs through fluorometric assays.
Such a sensor could be paired with a detection and/or therapeutic output depending on the aim. As a proof of concept, we chose to focus on 2 diseases, each highly cumbersome: IBD in humans, and fireblight in plants.
We aim to create an autonomous theragnostic system for chronic inflammation
treatment. The probiotic bacteria equipped with high-ROS-tuned OxyR will be able to
adapt the amounts of therapeutic ROS-scavenging enzymes produced, with local
and timely precision. Catalase (KatG gene) was chosen as it is commonly used in
ROS-scavenging therapeutic engineered bacteria, although the sensing pathway differs
[6]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) would also be pertinent, however, more
difficult to test since we chose H2O2 as our ROS.
Catalase: 2H2O2 → 2 H2O + O2
SOD: 2O2•−+2H+ → H2O2+O2
The sensor will be engineered in epiphytic microbiota to detect high-ROS occurring during plant infections like fireblight, producing a fluorescent glow (mScarlet protein) as infection indicator. In response to detection, a bacteriostatic would be secreted, such as E. amylovora’s (fireblight agent) own siderophore, an iron chelator called desferrioxamine E [21], which would allow our competing bacteria to slow down the infection by stealing its vital iron. This translatable platform could also be applied to other high-ROS-producing diseases, like the Xylella fastidiosa infection in grapevines, Pseudomonas syringae on leaves, and Zymoseptoria tritici infection in wheat.
Inflammation is a critical part of the body’s immune response. It helps in eliminating pathogens and promotes tissue repair and recovery. ‘Chronic’ inflammation however, impairs the healing process, persists over prolonged periods of time and can cause serious damage [22,23]. Many prevalent diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with chronic inflammation and are incurable [24]. Chronic inflammation is therefore one of the most significant causes of death worldwide [25].
One characteristic most sites of chronic inflammation have in common are significantly elevated ROS levels. This is the case for chronic wounds in diabetic patients and is a major factor in IBD [26,27]. While low levels of ROS are essential in stimulating effective wound healing, excessive ROS cause cellular damage and impair wound repair by obstructing the shift from inflammatory stage to the proliferative stage of wound healing [28]. High ROS levels may even have a causative role by activating signaling pathways that are associated with chronic inflammation [29,30].
Our technology aims to target high ROS levels as both an indicator for chronic inflammation and a problem to be solved. The sensor will be specifically tuned to high concentrations and activate transcription and secretion of antioxidant enzymes to treat the inflammation (catalase, SOD). Due to the high relevance of oxidative stress in chronic inflammation, ROS scavenging is an attractive therapeutic approach. Anti-oxidative enzymes have been shown to help with diabetic wounds, like promising hydrogels loaded with SOD [32]. Also in IBD, antioxidants are a promising therapeutic approach [33]. We aim to engineer probiotic bacteria, equipping them with a high-ROS-tuned sensor to produce therapeutic ROS-scavenging enzymes with local and timely precision.
Farmers worldwide face increasing challenges from weather catastrophes, economic difficulties, and biological hazards. We aim to alleviate the risk and economic loss caused by bacterial infections by helping farmers detect and prevent their spread. Erwinia amylovora is a bacterium that infects and kills fruit trees. While E. amylovora can be treated with antibiotics, it is mostly prohibited in Europe due to environmental concerns [34], thus cutting of infected plants remains the only curative solution [35]. In 2007, fireblight caused 50 million CHF in damages [36].
Fireblight is caused by the bacteria Erwinia amylovora that infects and colonizes plant flowers, shoots and leaves [37]. E. amylovora, and other Gram negative bacteria like Pseudomonas syringae, inject toxins into the plant’s cells to kill them, promoting the infection of plant tissue [37]. Bacterial toxins are transferred through a secretion system (T3SS) that acts like a needle, perforating the plant cell [39, 40]. This activity, specific to some pathogenic species of bacteria, triggers strong ROS release from the plant as a defense mechanism (Fig. 11). This leads to cell death for both plant cells and sensitive bacteria. Early detection of abnormal ROS levels in plant tissue could thus reveal the presence of pathogenic bacteria before it spreads. However, ROS are produced in many situations, like abiotic stress (drought) or ripening, where H2O2 ranges from 0.5 to 1.5 mM [41]. Therefore, detection has to take into account the normal fluctuating ROS levels as a threshold. The range should be between 1-10 mM as ROS levels during infection can be at least 5 times higher (Fig. 11).
Currently, the main detection systems are based on sample retrieval and individual screening (PCR [43], bacteriophages). Moreover, E. amylovora biocontrol with competing beneficial micro-organisms like P. fluorescens (found in Serenade®) / P. agglomerans, or copper, sprayed on the flowers, stand out as the best modern chemical-free approaches [9, 37, 44, 45]. Engineered bacteria with a lytic E. amylovora-killing phage have managed to combine detection and biocontrol [46] but rely on transduction (deemed unsafe as biopesticide [47]), would push pathogens towards resistance [48] and are country-strain specific [49]. We propose a simpler approach, allowing early detection of any E. amylovora strain infection by engineering bacteria already present in the plant microbiota to detect ROS, acting as preventive and inducible biocontrol agents. Fluorescence would be detected by UV lamps at night and could be automated with drones [50,51], allowing early removal of infected flowers before further dissemination.
1. R. Mittler, ROS Are Good. Trends Plant Sci 22, 11–19 (2017).
2. L. Milkovic, A. Cipak Gasparovic, M. Cindric, P.-A. Mouthuy, N. Zarkovic, Short Overview of ROS as Cell Function Regulators and Their Implications in Therapy Concepts. Cells 8, 793 (2019).
3. J. Zhou, et al., Reactive oxygen species-sensitive materials: A promising strategy for regulating inflammation and favoring tissue regeneration. Smart Materials in Medicine 4, 427–446 (2023).
4. A. Baez, J. Shiloach, Escherichia coli avoids high dissolved oxygen stress by activation of SoxRS and manganese-superoxide dismutase. Microbial Cell Factories 12, 23 (2013).
5. J. Y. Xia, et al., Engineered calprotectin-sensing probiotics for IBD surveillance in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 120, e2221121120 (2023).
6. J. Zhou, et al., Programmable probiotics modulate inflammation and gut microbiota for inflammatory bowel disease treatment after effective oral delivery. Nature Communications 13, 3432 (2022).
7. N. B. Svenningsen, et al., Pseudomonas putida mt-2 tolerates reactive oxygen species generated during matric stress by inducing a major oxidative defense response. BMC Microbiol 15, 202 (2015).
8. B. P. Aktepe, Y. Aysan, Biological Control of Fire Blight Disease Caused by Erwinia amylovora on Apple. Erwerbs-Obstbau 65, 645–654 (2023).
9. J. Cabrefiga, J. Francés, E. Montesinos, A. Bonaterra, Improvement of a dry formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens EPS62e for fire blight disease biocontrol by combination of culture osmoadaptation with a freeze-drying lyoprotectant. Journal of Applied Microbiology 117, 1122–1131 (2014).
10. X. Jing, et al., Engineering Pseudomonas protegens Pf‐5 to improve its antifungal activity and nitrogen fixation. Microb Biotechnol 13, 118–133 (2018).
11. P. J. Pomposiello, B. Demple, Redox-operated genetic switches: the SoxR and OxyR transcription factors. Trends in Biotechnology 19, 109–114 (2001).
12. M. Delic, et al., Overexpression of the transcription factor Yap1 modifies intracellular redox conditions and enhances recombinant protein secretion. Microb Cell 1, 376–386.
13. L. C. Dacquay, D. R. McMillen, Improving the design of an oxidative stress sensing biosensor in yeast. FEMS Yeast Research 21, foab025 (2021).
14. D. Tsuzi, K. Maeta, Y. Takatsume, S. Izawa, Y. Inoue, Regulation of the yeast phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase GPX2 by oxidative stress is mediated by Yap1 and Skn7. FEBS Lett 565, 148–154 (2004).
15. Y. Zhang, M. J. Tessaro, M. Lassner, X. Li, Knockout Analysis of Arabidopsis Transcription Factors TGA2, TGA5, and TGA6 Reveals Their Redundant and Essential Roles in Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell 15, 2647–2653 (2003).
16. A. Herrera-Vásquez, et al., TGA class II transcription factors are essential to restrict oxidative stress in response to UV-B stress in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 72, 1891–1905 (2020).
17. C. Picazo, M. Molin, Impact of Hydrogen Peroxide on Protein Synthesis in Yeast. Antioxidants 10, 952 (2021).
18. W. Fan, X. Dong, In Vivo Interaction between NPR1 and Transcription Factor TGA2 Leads to Salicylic Acid–Mediated Gene Activation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14, 1377–1389 (2002).
19. B. Fode, T. Siemsen, C. Thurow, R. Weigel, C. Gatz, The Arabidopsis GRAS Protein SCL14 Interacts with Class II TGA Transcription Factors and Is Essential for the Activation of Stress-Inducible Promoters. Plant Cell 20, 3122–3135 (2008).
20. S. C. Amack, M. S. Antunes, CaMV35S promoter – A plant biology and biotechnology workhorse in the era of synthetic biology. Current Plant Biology 24, 100179 (2020).
21. M. Salomone-Stagni, et al., A complete structural characterization of the desferrioxamine E biosynthetic pathway from the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Journal of Structural Biology 202, 236–249 (2018).
22. R. Zhao, H. Liang, E. Clarke, C. Jackson, M. Xue, Inflammation in Chronic Wounds. Int J Mol Sci 17, 2085 (2016).
23. A. D. Widgerow, Chronic wounds – is cellular ‘reception’ at fault? Examining integrins and intracellular signalling. Int Wound J 10, 185–192 (2012).
24. C. H. Liu, et al., Biomarkers of chronic inflammation in disease development and prevention: challenges and opportunities. Nature Immunology 18, 1175–1180 (2017).
25. R. Pahwa, A. Goyal, I. Jialal, “Chronic Inflammation” in StatPearls, (StatPearls Publishing, 2024).
26. M. Schäfer, S. Werner, Oxidative stress in normal and impaired wound repair. Pharmacological Research 58, 165–171 (2008).
27. A. R. Bourgonje, et al., Crohn’s Disease in Clinical Remission Is Marked by Systemic Oxidative Stress. Front Physiol 10, 499 (2019).
28. Z. Deng, et al., M1 macrophage mediated increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) influence wound healing via the MAPK signaling in vitro and in vivo. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 366, 83–95 (2019).
29. Y. An, et al., Autophagy promotes MSC-mediated vascularization in cutaneous wound healing via regulation of VEGF secretion. Cell Death & Disease 9, 1–14 (2018).
30. E. Asai, M. Yamamoto, K. Ueda, S. Waguri, Spatiotemporal alterations of autophagy marker LC3 in rat skin fibroblasts during wound healing process. Fukushima J Med Sci 64, 15–22 (2018).
31. G. Wang, et al., The initiation of oxidative stress and therapeutic strategies in wound healing. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 157, 114004 (2023).
32. L. Zhang, et al., A composite hydrogel of chitosan/heparin/poly (γ-glutamic acid) loaded with superoxide dismutase for wound healing. Carbohydrate Polymers 180, 168–174 (2018).
33. B. Ar, et al., Oxidative Stress and Redox-Modulating Therapeutics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. PubMed.
35. B. Duffy, H.-J. Schärer, M. Bünter, A. Klay, E. Holliger, Regulatory measures against Erwinia amylovora in Switzerland. EPPO Bulletin 35, 239–244 (2005).
36. M. Gusberti, U. Klemm, M. S. Meier, M. Maurhofer, I. Hunger-Glaser, Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, 11422–11447 (2015).
37. S. Aćimović, C. Meredith, Evaluation of dormant copper sprays with bark penetrating surfactants in reduction of Erwinia amylovora in cankers and of low-rate copper sprays in blossom blight control. 25, 15–20 (2017).
38. J. Huang, C. Yao, Y. Sun, Q. Ji, X. Deng, Virulence-related regulatory network of Pseudomonas syringae. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 20, 6259–6270 (2022).
39. Z. Cui, et al., Expression of the Type III Secretion System Genes in Epiphytic Erwinia amylovora Cells on Apple Stigmas Benefits Endophytic Infection at the Hypanthium. MPMI 34, 1119–1127 (2021).
40. A. Launay, O. Patrit, E. Wénès, M. Fagard, DspA/E Contributes to Apoplastic Accumulation of ROS in Non-host A. thaliana. Front Plant Sci 7, 545 (2016).
41. J. M. Cheeseman, Hydrogen peroxide concentrations in leaves under natural conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 2435–2444 (2006).
42. D. Hua, J. Duan, M. Ma, Z. Li, H. Li, Reactive oxygen species induce cyanide-resistant respiration in potato infected by Erwinia carotovora subsp. Carotovora. Journal of Plant Physiology 246–247, 153132 (2020).
43. S. Bereswill, A. Pahl, P. Bellemann, W. Zeller, K. Geider, Sensitive and species-specific detection of Erwinia amylovora by polymerase chain reaction analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 58, 3522–3526 (1992).
44. G. A. L. Broggini, et al., Detection of the fire blight biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis BD170 (Biopro�) in a Swiss apple orchard. Eur J Plant Pathol 111, 93–100 (2005).
45. I.-Y. Kim, et al., Controlled release of Pantoea agglomerans E325 for biocontrol of fire blight disease of apple. Journal of Controlled Release 161, 109–115 (2012).
46. S. Gayder, S. Kammerecker, L. Fieseler, Biological control of the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora using bacteriophages. J Plant Pathol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-023-01478-y.
47. S. Hagens, M. J. Loessner, Bacteriophage for biocontrol of foodborne pathogens: calculations and considerations. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11, 58–68 (2010).
48. S. T. Abedon, K. M. Danis-Wlodarczyk, D. J. Wozniak, Phage Cocktail Development for Bacteriophage Therapy: Toward Improving Spectrum of Activity Breadth and Depth. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14, 1019 (2021).
49. S. Gayder, M. Parcey, A. J. Castle, A. M. Svircev, Host Range of Bacteriophages Against a World-Wide Collection of Erwinia amylovora Determined Using a Quantitative PCR Assay. Viruses 11, 910 (2019).
50. H. Ye, et al., Recognition of Banana Fusarium Wilt Based on UAV Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing 12, 938 (2020).
51. P. J. Zarco-Tejada, V. González-Dugo, J. A. J. Berni, Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera. Remote Sensing of Environment 117, 322–337 (2012).