Overview
To enable the degradation of microplastics in a sustainable and eco-friendly manner, we have engineered bacteria
to produce enzymes capable of breaking down PET molecules, PETase. With the additional introduction of
Rhodococcus into our system, the products will be further degraded into H2O and CO2.
PETase
Introduction of PETase
PETase, known as polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase, is a class of enzymes that can degrade PET
(polyethylene terephthalate), which is among the most durable and common types of microplastic found [1] PETases show similar characteristics with both lipases and cutinases; they
catalyze the breakdown of PET into mono terephthalic acids (MHET), terephthalate (TPA), and ethylene glycol
(EG) via ester hydrolysis. To achieve the degradation of PET under regular ordinary settings, we aim to
develop highly active PETases that function efficiently at room temperature.
IsPETase and BhrPETase
From the iGEM distribution kit, our team found PETases: IsPETase. IsPETase is an enzyme found in
Ideonella sakaiensis that possesses the ability to degrade crystalline PET [2]. Later we found another PETase from the pape BhrPETase is a variant of the PETase
enzyme identified from the bacterium Ideonella sakaiensis [3] ; it
enhances the further degradation of PET. BhrPETase shows improved capabilities of breaking down PET due to
its higher efficiency, thermal stability, and activity compared to wild-type PETase.
Chassis Selection
Initially, during our experiments, we utilized E. coli as chassis. Its advantages of a short growth
period and ease of genetic manipulation makes plasmid construction quicker and easier. However, E. coli
is unable to generate energy independently. This makes cyanobacteria, Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942,
more suitable chassis for our purposes. Cyanobacteria are capable of harnessing solar energy through
photosynthesis, reducing reliance on external carbon sources. This characteristic contributes to a more
environmentally friendly and cost-effective PET degrading system. Additionally, regarding the impression of the
final output, the appealing green color and the odorless nature of cyanobacteria, further establishing it as a
more preferable chassis compared to E. coli.
Pathway
The overall degradation mechanism is as follows.
Figure 1. Summary of the degradation mechanism of PET
The modified organisms containing genes that encode either IsPETase or BhrPETase synthesize these enzymes
intracellularly. The addition of a signal peptide on the PETase assists the enzyme to exit the
E. coli. Once
outside the cell membrane, the PETase will degrade PET into monomers by breaking the ester bonds. The resulting
products MHET, TPA and EG, will be further decomposed by the bacterium
Rhodococcus. These bacteria will break
down TPA and EG into CO
2 and H
2O.
Co-Culture
Rhodococcus is bacteria widely used in environmental pollution bioremediation [4] , such as degradation of xenobiotic substances, heavy metal adsorption, reduction and
bio desulfurization. Therefore, Rhodococcus is considered as one of the best candidates strain for in
situ bioremediation. The Rhodococcus jostii is in charge of degrading TPA and EG, which were the monomers
produced by the PETase degrading process, into H2O and CO2.
Plasmid Construction
To allow E. coli to produce PETase, we introduced the genes encoding these enzymes using plasmid vectors.
We constructed our initial plasmids that were introduced into E. coli using pET28a, a classical plasmid
vector used for protein expression in E.coli. This vector contains the T7 promoter, the lac operator, a
ribosome binding site, the 6xHis sequence, and the T7 terminator. The T7 promoter is a strong promoter
recognizable by T7 RNA polymerase, used to regulate gene expression of recombinant proteins. The lac operator
can be activated by IPTG and used to control gene expression. The 6xHis sequence encodes for a tag that
facilitates protein purification; however, we did not take advantage of it since our design does not require the
extraction of the enzymes. Aside from the features included in the plasmid backbone, the genes coding for the
different enzymes are inserted between the ribosome binding site and 6xHis sequence. In addition to using the
two PETase from the iGEM distribution kit: IsPETase and BhrPETase. We applied an AI model we trained to generate
mutated versions that possibly encode enzymes with higher efficiencies.
Figure 2. Table of mutated versions of IsPETase/BhrPETase
Upon consulting ChatGPT, we learned that in order to secrete the enzymes synthesized within the bacteria cells,
we needed to attach signal peptides to the enzymes. ChatGPT provided us with several signal peptide sequences.
We then confirmed to use the pelB sequence after conducting further research. This sequence is inserted before
the PETase sequence.
Figure 3. Diagram of plasmid for E. coli
Subsequent to deciding to use cyanobacteria as our chassis, we rebuilt our plasmids using a transfer vector
instead. We inserted the sequence including the signal peptide, PETase and 6xHis sequences between the promoter
PpsbA2 and Bb_B0015. The t-vector transports the genes into the cyanobacteria, which are then incorporated into
the host cell genome.
Figure 4. Diagram of plasmid for cyanobacteria
References
Unless otherwise specificed, images used here are licensed under Creative Commons 4.0.
[1] Han, X., Liu, W., Huang, J., Ma, J., Zheng, Y., Ko, T., Xu, L., Cheng, Y., Chen,
C., & Guo, R. (2017a). Structural insight into catalytic mechanism of PET hydrolase. Nature Communications,
8(1),https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02255-z.
[2] Lee, S. H., Seo, H., Hong, H., Park, J., Ki, D., Kim, M., Kim, H., & Kim, K.
(2023). Three-directional engineering of IsPETase with enhanced protein yield, activity, and durability. Journal
of Hazardous Materials, 459, 132297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132297.
[3] Kato, Shingo, et al. “Long-Term Cultivation and Metagenomics Reveal Ecophysiology
of Previously Uncultivated Thermophiles Involved in Biogeochemical Nitrogen Cycle.” Microbes and Environments,
vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 107–10, https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me17165.
[4] Diao, J., Hu, Y., Tian, Y., Carr, R., & Moon, T. S. (2022). Upcycling of
poly(ethylene terephthalate) to produce high-value bio-products. Cell Reports, 42(1), 111908, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111908.