. Parts of Collection .

Overview

This year, our project is dedicated to a crucial task: enhancing the deinking efficiency of paper. This initiative is of paramount importance as it directly contributes to increasing the recycling rate of waste paper, thereby reducing deforestation and mitigating the climate crisis.

Through three rounds of rigorous screening, we have achieved a significant milestone: the successful identification of the most efficient deinking enzyme CYP199A4 253A from a range of deinking enzymes. This breakthrough could serve as a viable alternative to the chemical method on the industry scale. Additionally, our introduction of an efficient secretion system for the secretion of our deinking enzymes has made this project more competitive in terms of cost and efficiency, bypassing the protein purification step. To this end, our team conducted a series of characterization experiments on eight signal peptides (AIgen, HlyA, OmpA, PelB, TorA, YebF, OsmY, LMT), and selected the optimal signal peptide LMT considering both secretion efficiency and metabolic burden.

Finally, we combined the secretion system with the deinking enzyme, and the experimental results unequivocally demonstrated the feasibility of our concept. The idea of using the secretion system to obtain deinking enzymes and apply them in the deinking process is not just a theory, but a practical and achievable solution.

We have divided our parts collection into the following two subsets:

Secretion System

Signal peptides are short amino acid sequences on secreted proteins and are natural assistants in separating proteins from the cytoplasm. We selected eight signal peptides (AIgen, HlyA, OmpA, PelB, TorA, YebF, OsmY, LMT) for E. coli, which can direct target proteins to the periplasm. These 8 signaling peptides involve two secretion pathways, and researchers can select signaling peptides from different secretion pathways to simplify their production or purification of proteins according to their needs. (see Model for more details)

To test the functions of these signal peptides, we constructed fusion proteins of these 8 signal peptides with sfGFP and performed a series of characterization experiments. In addition, we performed modeling analysis for the secretion kinetics of the signal peptides to investigate the exocytosis efficiency of the different signal peptides as well as the metabolic pressure on cell growth.

According to the experimental results and modeling results, the signal peptides AIgen and OmpA had less metabolic pressure on the strain, but the secretion effect was average, and the products mainly originated from the leakage and dead cell lysis; the signal peptides PelB and OsmY had a heavier metabolic burden on the strain and the secretion effect was poor; and the signal peptide YebF had a heavier metabolic burden on the strain as well but the exocytosis effect was OK. Happily, the exocytosis peptide LMT has quite good exocytosis efficiency and less effect on the metabolic load of the strain, which meets our needs well. (Please see our Model page)

In addition, in order to further obtain better exocytosis, we also used 6 different Anderson promoters with LMT-sfGFP fusion proteins constituting the composite part, and quantitatively characterized their exocytosis efficiency to determine the most efficient promoter combination. (Please see our Results page).

We have detailed our design and recorded all experimental data into the registry. We believe that our collection of parts will be of value in guiding the design and characterization of future IGEM teams, when they need to find a suitable exocytosis peptide that will help them produce proteins.

List 1 Parts of the signal peptides
Part number Type Description
BBa_K5136060 coding Algen
BBa_K5136061 coding OmpA
BBa_K5136062 coding PelB
BBa_K5136063 coding TorA
BBa_K5136064 coding YebF
BBa_K5136065 coding LMT
BBa_K5136066 coding OsmY
BBa_K5136067 composite HlyA

Deinking Enzymes

We designed an efficient and stable biological deinking enzyme system, which includes cellulase, monooxygenase, and laccase. (See our Design page for more details.) After preliminary experiments, we found that monooxygenase plays a key role in this system. Therefore, we focused on comparing the deinking efficiencies of several monooxygenase enzymes and designing relevant mutations to further improve their performance.

Figure 1 Collection of deinking enzymes (CODE), including various monooxygenases that functions in the reaction step in pulp deinking SOP in lab.

Monooxygenase is an oxidoreductase that catalyzes the insertion of a single oxygen atom into an organic substrate, which causes alkaline breakage of conjugated side chains of lignin and other colored substances. Therefore, we selected three highly active monooxygenases using H2O2 as electron donor monooxygenases: CYP199A4, SfmD, and OleTJE, and the deinking ability of them and their mutants were characterized by our pulp deinking experiments. (See our Results page for more details.) The experimental results showed that CYP199A4 and its mutants had the best deinking efficiency, and its mutant increased significantly compared with the wild type.

Therefore, we saturated mutation at locus 253 of CYP199A4 and characterized its deinking effect and enzyme activity by deinking assay and enzyme activity test, among which CYP199A4 253A mutant showed the best effect (See our Results page for more details.)

Figure 2 Comparison of the Relative Gray Scale of CYP199A4 and its mutants.

Finally, we constructed the fusion protein of LMT and CYP199A4 T253E and expressed it in E. coli BL21(DE3). Deinking reaction was carried out with culture medium supernatant. The experimental results are shown in Figure 1. Although CYP199A4 T253E is not the best deinking enzyme, the signal peptide and its component deinking system have shown very efficient deinking effect. This means that our parts collection is successful, and the signal peptide and deinking enzyme can be combined into an efficient deinking system.

We have detailed our design and recorded all experimental data in the registry. We believe that when future iGEM teams need to find an efficient deinking enzyme, our parts collection will be of value in guiding their design and characterization.

List 2 Parts of the monooxygenase
Part number Type Description
BBa_K5136000 coding CYP199A4 WT-his tag
BBa_K5136001 coding CYP199A4 T253E-his tag
BBa_K5136002 coding CYP199A4 T253S-his tag
BBa_K5136003 coding CYP199A4 T253A-his tag
BBa_K5136004 coding CYP199A4 T253R-his tag
BBa_K5136005 coding CYP199A4 T253N-his tag
BBa_K5136006 coding CYP199A4 T253D-his tag
BBa_K5136007 coding CYP199A4 T253C-his tag
BBa_K5136008 coding CYP199A4 T253Q-his tag
BBa_K5136009 coding CYP199A4 T253W-his tag
BBa_K5136010 coding CYP199A4 T253G-his tag
BBa_K5136011 coding CYP199A4 T253H-his tag
BBa_K5136012 coding CYP199A4 T253I-his tag
BBa_K5136013 coding CYP199A4 T253L-his tag
BBa_K5136014 coding CYP199A4 T253K-his tag
BBa_K5136015 coding CYP199A4 T253M-his tag
BBa_K5136016 coding CYP199A4 T253F-his tag
BBa_K5136017 coding CYP199A4 T253P-his tag
BBa_K5136018 coding CYP199A4 T253V-his tag
BBa_K5136019 coding CYP199A4 T253Y-his tag
BBa_K5136020 coding SfmD WT
BBa_K5136021 coding SfmD 277F
BBa_K5136023 coding OleTJE
BBa_K5136024 coding OleTJE 236S 100K 166K
BBa_K5136025 coding OleTJE 236S 360K 167K
BBa_K51360 coding LMT-linker-CYP199A4 T253E

Conclusion

Through our parts production, we have searched for an efficient and less costly way to produce deinking enzymes to deink waste paper to regenerate new, high-quality paper. (See our Implementation page)

Through our parts collection, we hope to enable all igem teams and researchers worldwide to obtain signal peptides that meet their needs quickly, link them to their target proteins, and produce the intended proteins efficiently and easily. We also hope that future teams attempting to study deinking can easily obtain the required deinking enzymes for further modification or mechanistic studies. We are eager to provide our parts collection to future iGEM teams.