Project Description
This year, our team is working to mitigate the environmental effects of
methane produced in cattle rumen. Enteric methane emissions are one of the
largest anthropogenic sources of this potent greenhouse gas (GHG)
(Reisinger et al., 2021). Some research has prompted development of some
solutions to address this issue, however existing feed additive solutions
have limited efficacy and lack incentives for farmers to implement due to
added feed cost (Hodge et al., 2024). Our solution involves
Chlorella vulgaris microalgae engineered to express phage-based
lytic enzymes specifically targeting methanogen populations. Not only is
microalgae a nutrient-rich potential feed additive, but due to similar
genetic engineering processes, this will act as a proof of concept for
genetically modified plants expressing these enzymes (Saadaoui et al.,
2021). Existing cellulose fermentation in the rumen degrades microalgae
and plant cell walls, providing a release mechanism for the enzymes
(Weimer et al., 2022). We envision an engineered crop-based solution to be
simple to implement, and cost-effective. Existing research shows that some
phage-based enzymes are capable of lysing cells in free form (Altermann et
al., 2018). Further, a reduction in certain methanogens can result in a
sustained microbiome shift to favour other hydrogen sinks, including
reductive acetogenesis.
Why are we tackling this problem?
Methane is a potent GHG. Since 1950, atmospheric methane concentrations
have surged by 70%, marking it one of the fastest-growing GHGs
(Bačėninaitė et al., 2022). It is a critical concern due to its profound
warming effect, which is 84 times more potent than CO2 over a twenty-year
period (European Commission, 2023).
The global warming induced by methane has contributed to a range of
critical issues, including rising temperatures, more frequent extreme
weather events that worsen air quality, increased drought occurrences, and
a rise in vector-borne diseases (European Commission, 2023). These factors
collectively contribute to higher mortality rates among humans and other
organisms.
According to the Global Methane Assessment by the Climate and Clean Air
Coalition and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), reducing
methane-associated GHGs could prevent more than 200,000 premature deaths,
hundreds of thousands of emergency room visits due to asthma, and more
than 20 million tonnes of crop losses annually by 2030 (2023).
This is made easier by methane’s relatively shorter life-span of 7-12
years (Reisinger et al., 2021). Unlike persistent GHGs that remain in the
atmosphere for centuries, methane's shorter duration means that reducing
its emissions can lead to more immediate reductions in its warming effect.
By decreasing methane emissions, we can mitigate its rapid contribution to
global warming and potentially achieve quicker reductions in atmospheric
GHG levels compared to longer-lived gases.
Why cows specifically?
Enteric methane generated by anaerobic activity of methanogenic archaea in
the rumen of cattle is the largest source of anthropogenic CH4 emissions
(Reisinger et al., 2024). A fully developed cow can emit up to 500 litres
of methane each day, accounting for approximately 3.7% of all GHG
emissions.
Dairy/beef products are popular, particularly with a growing human
population, and consumer behaviour alone is unlikely to change
sufficiently to reduce climate change. As of 2023, in North America...
Over
3.5
Million Beef Cattle (Stat. Canada, 2024)
Approximatly
968,500
Dairy Cows (Stat. Canada, 2024)
Over
90
Million Farmed Cattle...
90 million in the United States — raised for a variety of food and
consumer products including beef, veal, dairy and leather (United States
Department of Agriculture, 2024)
Targeting cattle provides for significant opportunity to reduce methane
emissions and mitigate climate change.
The rumen of cattle offers a unique environment for addressing this issue.
Unlike greenhouse gases from industrial or domestic sources, mitigation
measures can be implemented within a naturally occurring system in a way
that is more realistic and less invasive than other means of reducing
anthropogenic methane emissions in the sector. Instead of investing in
alternate manure management approaches, such as anaerobic digesters, or
expensive precision equipment (i.e., sensors), we can address the issue
internally by altering microbial activity, at little inconvenience to
agricultural stakeholders.
Our solution developed through synthetic biology can be easily scaled up
and distributed widely, ensuring that the benefits of reduced methane
emissions can be realized across large populations of livestock
efficiently without requiring significant changes in farming
infrastructure.
Not only that, our approach also easily complements other emission
reduction measures, such as improved feeding strategies or breeding
programs for low-methane-emitting cattle.
References
- Altermann, E., Schofield, L. R., Ronimus, R. S., Beatty, A. K., & Reilly, K. (2018). Inhibition of Rumen Methanogens by a Novel Archaeal Lytic Enzyme Displayed on Tailored Bionanoparticles. Frontiers in microbiology, 9, 2378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02378
- Bačėninaitė, D., Džermeikaitė, K., & Antanaitis, R. (2022). Global Warming and Dairy Cattle: How to Control and Reduce Methane Emission. Animals: an open access journal from MDPI, 12(19), 2687. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12192687
- European Commision (2023). Methane emissions. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/carbon-management-and-fossil-fuels/methane-emissions_en
- Hodge, I., Quille, P., & O'Connell, S. (2024). A Review of Potential Feed Additives Intended for Carbon Footprint Reduction through Methane Abatement in Dairy Cattle. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 14(4), 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040568
- Reisinger, A., Clark, H., Cowie, A. L., Emmet-Booth, J., Gonzalez Fischer, C., Herrero, M., Howden, M., & Leahy, S. (2021). How necessary and feasible are reductions of methane emissions from livestock to support stringent temperature goals?. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 379(2210), 20200452. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0452
- Saadaoui, I., Rasheed, R., Aguilar, A. et al. Microalgal-based feed: promising alternative feedstocks for livestock and poultry production. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 12, 76(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00593-z
- Statistics Canada (2024, February 23). Number of cattle, by class and farm type. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=3210013001#timeframe
- UNEP (2023). Methane emissions are driving climate change. here’s how to reduce them. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/methane-emissions-are-driving-climate-change-heres-how-reduce-them
- United States Department of Agriculture (2024). United States cattle inventory down 2%. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Newsroom/2024/01-31-2024.php
- Weimer P. J. (2022). Degradation of Cellulose and Hemicellulose by Ruminal Microorganisms. Microorganisms, 10(12), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122345