Plasmid amplification and reconstruction
In degradation module we constructed 4 main plasmids. Two PE
degrading enzymes, CYPY96F-VHb and AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA, are designed
to accelerate the degradation rate by improving the absorbing and
hydroxylation of PE monomer. In order to express above two enzymes
in our chassis, pAB1-cypY96F-vgb and pAB1-alkB2-Rd45-adhA were
constructed. pAB1-pS-PEBP-PEase was constructed to depolymerize PE
microplastics. In addition, pAB1-PEBP-GFP was constructed to
verify the adsorption capacity of PEBP to PE by fluorescence
microscopy.
Figure 1 a. Map of plasmid pAB1-alkB2-Rd45-adhA b. Map of
plasmid pAB1-cypY96F-vgb c. Map of plasmif pAB1-pS-PEBP-GFP d.
Map of pAB1-pS-PEBP-PEase
Figure 2 The PCR result of AlkB-Rd45-AdhA fragment. The band was
identical to the expected length of 3033bp
Figure 3 The PCR result of CYPY96F-VHb fragment. The band was
identical to the expected length of 2285bp
Figure 4 The PCR result of PEBP-GFP fragment. The band was
identical to the expected length of 2108bp
Figure 5 The PCR result of PEBP-GFP fragment. The band was
identical to the expected length of 3231bp
The bands of AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA, CYP-VHb, PEBP-GFP and PEBP-PEase,
from PCR were identical to the theoretical lengths estimated by
the designed primer locations, which could demonstrate that we
successfully amplified our target fragments, we then used
homologous recombination to link the vectors and fragments.
Strain construction
We transferred the constructed plasmids into
Escherichia coli
DH5αstrain and conducted colony PCR. After obtained the
correct results we amplified and extracted the constructed
plasmids. Then we transferred these plasmids into
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 strain and E. coli BL21
strain and obtained correct colony PCR results, indicating that we
successfully constructed strains containing these plasmids.
Figure 6 P.aeruginosa PAO1 colony PCR results of
CYPY96F-VHb and AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA
Figure 7 P.aeruginosa PAO1 colony PCR result of
PEBP-PEase and PEBP-GFP. In order to improve primer specificity,
we change the location of primer and PEBP-GFP theoretical
lengths estimated by the designed primer locations is 1875bp
Expression
In order to verify whether AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA, CYPY96F and VHb
proteins were successfully expressed in the strains, SDS-PAGE was
performed and the following results were obtained.
Figure 8 SDS-PAGE result of CYPY96F-VHb
The plasmid pAB1-cypY96F-vgb is expected to express CYPY96F and
VHb. The molecular weight of CYPY96F is estimated to be 47.48kDa
and that of VHb is estimated to be 16.73kDa. In the figure, it can
be seen that the bands in the pAB1-cypY96F-vgb group were
significantly deepened at around 45kDa and 15kDa compared with the
control group, indicating that CYPY96F and VHb proteins were
successfully expressed.
Figure 9 SDS-PAGE result of AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA
Plasmid pAB1-AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA is expected to express a large fusion
protein AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA with a molecular weight of 94.59kDa. In
the figure, it can be seen that there were an extra bands in the
experimental group than in the control group at a position
slightly less than 100kDa, suggesting that AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA protein
was successfully expressed.
Figure 10 SDS-PAGE result of PEBP-GFP
The plasmid pAB1-pS-PEBP-GFP is expected to express a large fusion
protein PEBP-GFP protein with a molecular weight of 67.73kDa. In
the figure, it can be seen that compared with the control group,
the experimental group had multiple marker bands in the middle of
the marker bands slightly smaller than 75kDa and 60kDa, suggesting
that the PEBP-GFP protein was successfully expressed.
The plasmid PAB1-pS-PEBP-PEase was expected to express a protein
with a size of 188.18kDa. Unfortunately, we did not see the
corresponding bands, so the protein may have failed to be
expressed in bacteria. We hypothesized that the protein could not
be expressed correctly due to its large molecular weight.
Therefore, we will verify the related effects of PEBP mainly by
engineering bacteria with plasmid pAB1-pS-PEBP-GFP.For the part of
the PEBP-PEase protein that are not verified, we used modeling
methods to predict it.
Therefore, in the expression verification stage, we successfully
verified the expression of AlkB2-Rd45-AdhA, CYPY96F, VHb and
PEBP-GFP proteins, which laid a solid foundation for our
subsequent effect verification.
Effect verification
In order to verify that the engineering bacteria did degrade the
microplastics faster, a 7-day co-incubation experiment was
conducted. When the co-culture was done, microplastics were
carefully separated from the culture medium and weighed. Fourier
infrared (FTIR) detection was performed on the incubated
microplastics to check the property changes of the microplastics,
and scanning electron microscopy was used to detect the
morphologic change on the surface of the microplastics.
Weighing:
The results of the weighing were only slightly different. The
remaining microplastics separated weighted 0.094g, 0.094g and
0.098g in PAO1::alkB2-Rd45-adhA,
PAO1::cypY96F-vgb, wild type PAO1 group. This result may
not be very convincing but it may also hint that our engineered
bacteria can degrade microplastics more effectively.
Fourier infrared detection:
Figure 11 FTIR results of co-cultured PE microplastics *The peak
around 2400 cm-1 is caused by the instrument itself,
that it lacks of argon
The FTIR results show that, the group without any bacteria have
shown classic absorption peaks of PE. The characteristic PE
absorbance peaks are located at 2921 cm-1, 2851
cm-1, 1456 cm-1, and 722cm-1,
each standing for CH2 asymmetric C-H stretch, CH2
symmetric C-H stretch, CH3 umbrella bending mode, and
spilt CH2
rock.
Compared to its line, the bacteria input group's peaks have
decreased in the intensity level, indicating the decrease in
chemical bonds. Especially, the engineered PAO1 have shown lower
intensity than the wild type of PAO1. The decrease of chemical
bonds indicates that the PAO1 is able to degradant PE, and our
plasmids have improved its ability.
Scanning electron microscopy:
Figure 12 From left to right, PAO1::alkB2-Rd45-adhA,
PAO1::cypY96F-vgb, wild type PAO1, blank control,
respectively In the first row, the experimental group is magnified
900 times, the control group is magnified 300 times In the second
row, the experimental group was magnified 5,000 times and the
control group 2,500 times
It can be seen that the overall particle size of microplastics
degraded by engineering bacteria is generally smaller than that of
the control group and microplastics co-incubated with Engineering
bacteria were broken into small fragments while control group
maintains complete microplastic particles. In the enlarged images
the microplastics co-incubated with the engineering bacteria
displayed a rough surface, while the microplastic in the control
group is rather smooth. All of these features suggest that
engineering bacteria degrade plastics more efficiently.
Effect verification of PEBP:
Figure 13 From left to right are images of microplastics with
500mm diameter incubated with GFP with PE binding peptide, with
GFP protein alone, and a blank control
The PEBP-GFP protein was extracted and purified. After being
immersed in PBS and cleaned twice by the vortex shaker, the
microplastics incubated with PEBP-GFP still generally showed
obvious fluorescence. The microplastics incubated with GFP can see
weak fluorescence of GFP residue after intense exposure, while the
blank group can not see any fluorescence under the fluorescence
microscope. It can be concluded that PEBP has strong binding
ability with microplastics.
Modeling of PEBP-PEase:
Figure 14 Predicted structure of PEBP-PEase protein
For PEase, we tested its effect through moduling. We conducted
structure predicting of PEBP-PEase. The predicting module clearly
displayed a membrane spanning domain and an enzyme domain, which
we exactly expected our bacteria to produce. After that molecular
docking was conducted to study the interactions between the PEase
enzyme and both large and small alkane molecules. It can be
observed that the docking sites and the binding pockets are
generally located within the same binding pocket, with multiple
amino acid residues (such as LEU246, ILE250, VAL589, LEU622, etc.)
surrounding the long-chain alkane. These amino acids are mostly
hydrophobic residues, which likely stabilize the alkane molecules
through hydrophobic interactions. Their affinity suggests that
PEase may have the ability to bind to and degrade PE
microplastics. (For detail information, please visit Modeling
page)