Professor Cristina Canova has worked on many studies carried out to have a deeper understanding on the effect of PFAS on human’s health.
On the occasion of the event at Pressana, we wanted to give some space
to an expert in epidemiology that worked on the PFAS problem. For this
reason we asked for the participation of professor Cristina Canova and
asked her to open the evening with a presentation of her recent research
on the effects of PFAS.
She had a key role in helping us organize the event at Pressana and
also in responding to some of the questions that the public had.
For more information on the event mentioned look
Society Engagement-Roundtable with Citizens.
In the first stages of our project, we decided to try to have a
global point of view on the problem. For this reason we asked some
professors from our university that work on PFAS to tell us the topic
of their research and how they approach it.
We asked Professor Mario Bortolozzi who works at the Veneto Institute
of Molecular Medicine (VIMM) to meet us. On this occasion, we had the
opportunity to visit his lab and have him explain his research as an
expert in the Neurological Effects of PFAS.
The decision to undertake a project that takes an active role
in the fight against PFAS contamination stems from the profound
impact this issue has had on our lives and those around us, especially
given its strong connection to our local area. This naturally led us
to address the psychological implications it has had on the most
affected communities.
Our research brought us to the book Cattive acque. Contaminazione
ambientale e comunità violate ("Bad Waters. Environmental Contamination
and Violated communities"), where professors Adriano Zamperini and
Marialuisa Menegatto present their sociological research on the
tangible impact of PFAS on people's lives and their interactions with
authorities and the scientific community. We held an introductory
meeting with the researchers on 19/3/2023, where they expressed
great enthusiasm for our project and offered to assist us in
establishing communication with the public. They provided valuable
advice on how to approach the citizens, emphasizing the importance
of building trust and maintaining transparency, with a clear commitment
to outreach and even involving the community in the project’s design,
taking into account their direct experiences. The importance of helping
citizens understand the scientific principles underlying the project
also emerged.
Professor Dietelmo Pievani covers the first Italian chair of
Philosophy of Biological Sciences at the Department of Biology
of the University of Padua. He is a renowned science communicator
who wrote the introduction to the before mentioned book ‘Cattive acque.
Contaminazione ambientale e comunità violate ("Bad Waters. Environmental
Contamination and Violated communities").
We interviewed him, gathering insights into the social impact
of PFAS and how to discuss the issue with different social groups.
To share the knowledge we gained, we published the interview on our
website and Instagram account.
Additionally, the professor suggested organizing a roundtable
with the community to foster debate and receive direct feedback on our project.
He continued to assist us in planning and organizing the event,
and eventually participated as a moderator, ensuring the smooth
running of the evening (more information on it could be found in
Society Engagement-Roundtable with Citizens).
Professor Ester Marotta's main research activity deals with the use
of non thermal plasma for the degradation of pollutants such as PFAS.
We contacted her in the first stages of our project to have an idea
of the current state of the art on PFAS degradation and guidance in
finding a possible solution.
She was enthusiastic and willing to help us from the beginning.
We kept in touch with her during all stages of the process, we
exchanged ideas, opinions and views. She also shared with us a
thesis of one of her doctoral students on GAC adsorption and gave
us access to her laboratories to test what we found in literature
on GAC and AER desorption.
Professor Elisabetta Bergantino is an expert in molecular biology working at the University of Padua. One of her most recent works, focused on the use of cyanobacteria as biocatalysts, served as an inspiration and starting point for the design of our project: from this, a possible synergy between the catalytic actions of laccase and dehalogenase was identified and proposed. The professor followed the design phase of our work with great interest, suggesting experimental approaches and solutions, and assisting us in the design process.
In the early stages of the project, while we were trying to
conceptualize a well-round project, we understood the importance
of a PFAS sensor in a real-case scenario.
This tool could be used in multiple steps of an industrial process
(as you can easily see in
Plant Design).
After a meeting with an UniPD professor, an expert in biosensors,
we understood that the creation of a PFAS sensor from the ground
up would not be possible in the given time period.
We therefore looked up if a product like this could be found
in the market.
We found only a start-up: FREDsense Technologies. It’s a
canadian company, founded after a participation in iGEM 2013,
that offers analytical services and it’s currently developing
portable field kits for PFAS detection.
We decided to contact them and organize a preliminary meeting
with CEO David Lyod to talk about our team, our project and
their product.
It was the beginning of an exchange of information between
us that has given us the opportunity to send them groundwater
samples from our region, collected at a Acquevenete’s facility
in the so called ‘Red Zone’ (a highly PFAS polluted area).
To fully understand what has been done since 2013, when the grave
problem of PFAS in Veneto was discovered, to find a solution to it
we decided to contact Acquevenete, a water service provider in the
so called ‘Red Zone’ in Veneto (which correspond to the most polluted
one, with a median of 44.2 ng/mL for PFOA alone when it’s known that
when the additive sum of PFAS concentrations in plasma is greater
than 2 ng/L health problems can occur).
To be able to provide 515.000 residents with clean water
Acquavenete has installed filtration plants that use granular
activated carbons (GAC) filters.
Unfortunately this is a downstream solution, which only allows
the problem to be contained.
In fact, there are currently no degradation methods for these
pollutants; when an aquifer, from which water is drawn for the
water supply system, is considered polluted you simply stop drawing
from it. But the problem remains.
The company has stressed how important the research on this topic
and a contribution like our is.
We established a partnership with them that has allowed us to get
technical data on their filtration systems.
Moreover Acquevenete has given us the opportunity to visit one of
their plants, where we were able to witness the changing of the filters
and collect some GAC samples that we then use in our experiments, and
groundwater samples before and after the filtration stage.
We then shipped the latter to FREDsense Technologies for some analysis.
Our team believes that a collaboration between the two, now in
communication thanks to us, can be mutually beneficial. In fact,
it would allow a comparison of analytical techniques used by different
organizations and in relation to samples collected from significantly
different territories.
We are grateful for the willingness shown by both companies,
committed to the common goal of tackling the global problem of PFAS pollution.
Through our researches we learned about an italian company
that sells PFAS-free non-stick pans and kitchenware.
We decided to contact the company founder, Rossana Dian,
famous food blogger that has taken the issue of PFAS pollution
to heart, leading her to the creation of the CucinoSano product line.
From the beginning she was willing to help us in publicizing
the team and the project through her instagram account, allowing
us to reach her 415k followers.
Furthermore she has given us a substantial donation and help us
make our fundraising known.
Following the advice of social psychology Professors Zamperini and
Menegatto
(Experts in the Sociological Impact of PFAS),
we reached
out via Facebook to MammeNoPFAS, a group of residents from PFAS-contaminated
areas who have come together to support their community. This network serves
both to exchange practical information on mitigating the health effects of
PFAS contamination and to disseminate scientific knowledge about the chemical
nature and health impacts of these substances.
We held an introductory meeting on 18/04/2024, with group representatives
Laura Facciolo, Michela Zamboni, and Giuliano Fin. They expressed great
enthusiasm for our work, emphasizing the importance of giving people
hope and showing them that someone is addressing their concerns.
MammeNoPFAS is a highly active group with numerous connections
to researchers worldwide who have studied potential PFAS degradation
methods. They generously offered to share contacts and data with us.
In particular, they helped us arrange a video call with Professor
Philippe Grandjean, a world-widely known expert in environmental
medicine who has focused on raising awareness about the health effects
of PFAS. During this call, the expert provided us with an in-depth
overview of the subject and his research findings, which revealed
that there is no safe minimum threshold for PFAS exposure without
toxic effects on health.
Additionally, MammeNoPFAS shared valuable information with us, such as methods for detecting PFAS in the environment and strategies for spreading awareness.
We had the opportunity to meet with some members of SIAN
(Food Hygiene and Nutrition Service), whose goal is to improve
individual and collective health by ensuring safe and quality food.
They told us about a study that they are currently doing by sampling
multiple animal products (such as milk, eggs, meat) from Veneto Red Zone,
the most polluted with PFAS.
They are also monitoring farms and ranches in that area that use
groundwater as sources of supply and if they detect a concentration
of PFAS above the recommended limit, they will proceed to shut down
the groundwater supply and seize the products, until they can be
sure that the water used for production is safe, for example by
using aqueduct water.
For our team it was very important to share knowledge with
younger students and tell them what’s going on in the science
world.
Thanks to some high schools in our territory we were able to
spread information about synthetic biology and PFAS.
We visited four high schools and, for a couple of hours,
taught younger students about what OGMs are, what synthetic
biology is, its core concepts (like the DBTL cycle) and what
applications this new field can have.
We also presented our group and what we want to achieve in our
project about PFAS degradation.
In order to keep the attention alive, we prepared a powerpoint
presentation to follow but also played some games and did some
activities with the students.
To better explain the importance of modularity in synthetic biology, for example, we did an activity based on biobrick assembly where they had to guess how to correctly manage the digestion and ligation of a plasmid.
Kahoot was also an important part of our lessons so that students could guess with us what PFAS are, where they can be found and why they are a problem but also if they really know what GMOs are.
In addition to talking to high school students, we also felt it was
important to talk to university students.
Some professors from different STEM faculties gave us the opportunity
to use part of their lesson to inform students about iGEM and give a brief
introduction to what is synthetic biology, its possible applications and how
it unites different scientific fields.
We also used these meetings to make our team known and temp the students to
be part of the 2025 Team.
We did this in the faculties of medicine, biology (specifically
molecular biology and biotechnologies), engineering (biomedical
engineering and computer engineering) and chemistry.
The University of Padua has created a Synthetic Biology Center,
a meeting point for professors and students from different faculties,
STEM and humanities, to allow a deeper collaboration to utilize synthetic
biology to solve current problems.
During the inauguration of this center we were given the
opportunity to participate and present us and our project.
Every year in September, the University of Padova organizes a
science festival where students, professors and researchers can
present their work to the population.
For this occasion we prepared some material that could show people
of all ages what it is like to work in the scientific and engineering field.
We prepared many agar petri dishes where children could put their
fingers and observe in the following days the growth of different
microorganisms that were on their hand.
Our university also allowed us to display some OGM plants that
are used for research and some microscopes where people could
observe different leaves and peels.
Another main attraction was a game where people would write
their name on a computer and a code would identify the letters
and pick out the corresponding amino acid. The sequence of amino
acids would then create an ideal protein.
This year in May our University organized a festival called “NEXT”.
In this occasion, students in STEM had the opportunity to present to
others what they are passionate about or the project they are working on.
This was done in a public space and every group was assigned a space where
they could present their material.
Our team participated and presented our iGEM project about PFAS biodegradation.
We decided to talk about the PFAS pollution, ask other students and outside
people what they knew about this problem, but also introduce our solution and
how we approach the topic.
In a “show and tell” kind of way, we brought with us a small bioreactor, a 3D
model of a PFAS molecule, a prototype of PFAS sensor, some GAC filters and some
engineered plants given by our professors to represent the genetic engineering
part of our work. These materials were the gateway to people’s curiosity and a
way to break the ice and start a conversation with anybody that was interested
in what we do.
We also made a social experiment about the knowledge of the PFAS problem by
asking people to ask some questions and express their answers with some
thread on a poster. With this spaghetti chart, we could have an idea of
what people think and know by just taking a glance.
Given the impact of the damage caused by PFAS pollution in the Veneto area,
our team thought it would be meaningful to engage in a face-to-face conversation
with people from the most affected areas to hear their fear and concerns .
Our team member Laura Acerbi was affected firsthand by the problem and had
to undergo medical screenings to ensure her health. In fact she was kind
of the starting point for our project.
Thanks to the municipal councilor Adriana Dalmaso, we had the opportunity
to cooperate with the Pressana municipality, a small village of about 2500
inhabitants, Laura included, but only one of the hundreds of villages affected.
After about 3 months of work on it, on the 18th of July we hosted an
evening event open to the public where we could expose our ideas and
what we are doing to make our project SurPFAS advance but,
most importantly, where we could listen to what people who
lived through the problem had to say. As a matter of fact,
we think that it is important for the scientific world to have
a direct relationship with the population in order to understand
worries and opinions about a bioremediation project like ours and
develop it accordingly. Moreover, this was a good occasion to test
market interest in the solution we are developing.
The evening had an informative approach and saw the participation
of Professor Dietelmo Pievani (professor of bioethics at UNIPD) and
Professor Cristina Canova (epidemiologist at UNIPD). The event started
with a speech by Professor Canova where she presented some of the
data she collected during her research on the effects of PFAS molecules
on people’s health, then we presented our project, what our goals are
and how we intend on achieving them. At last, we felt it was necessary
to set aside some time to have an active interaction with the public
starting from some questions that we prepared in advance. The smooth
running of the evening took place thanks to the mediation of Professor
Pievani.
The organization of the event was possible thanks to the
availability of the municipality that believes it is important
to inform the population and thanks to the help of professors
of our University. In particular, Professor Pievani and Professors
Zamperini and Menegatto (Sociology department UNIPD) advised us on
the most effective way to interact with people who were affected by
the problem and they helped us find the correct structure for the event.
In addition to the population, we had invited some companies who we
collaborated with and Legambiente which is a voluntary organization
who deals with environmental problems in italian regions. Legambiente
Veneto cooperates with other local organizations in the “operazione
fiumi” that is a project that plans to analyze the state of the rivers
in the area and measure, for the first time, the levels of PFAS in the waters.
Every member of the audience was given a brochure with a brief description
of our project, a list of possible questions that could be asked during
the evening and our contacts.
On the back of the brochure there also was a qr code connected to a
questionnaire. This was made to allow people who didn’t have the opportunity
to talk during the event, to tell us their opinion.
We received answers from people of all educational levels and backgrounds.
One of the questions asked in the questionnaire was about possible
ways, other than degradation, to combat PFAS pollution: 53.1 % of
those who took part in the survey believed that the problem should
be dealt with directly at source, by banning the sale of products
containing these molecules and possibly finding environmentally
sustainable alternatives. On the contrary, 31.3 % of the remainder
believe it is necessary to find a methodology to remove PFAS already
present in the bloodstream.
We also asked whether the presence of genetically modified
organisms (Escherichia coli) within a degradation process
such as the one we hypothesized would cause any kind of concern:
90.6 % of respondents did not feel particularly worried since they
will be within a closed environment such as a bioreactor.
In this regard, however, someone emphasized the need to clearly
inform the population about what happens and how in a process in
which genetically modified organisms are present.
People who took part in the survey believe that PFAS removal
is most urgent on water matrices, with priority being given to
industrial wastewater (40.6%) and groundwater (31.3%). Household
water treatment is perceived as less of a priority.
None of the participants considered it necessary to work primarily on air.
However, several people asserted the need to work on all matrices
at the same time.
Thus, it appears that those interviewed believe that the removal of
PFAS should start with the cleaning of aqueous matrices, such as groundwater.
After that, the study should move on to wastewater from industrial
plants and finally move on to soils receiving such water and the air
surrounding industrial plants.
This information therefore allows us to confirm our choice of matrix
and identify future research steps.
As a last question on the survey we asked what weaknesses
could they find in our project in order to change our path
and fortify them.
Many people have emphasized the importance of having a project
that could be economically sustainable so that it could be realized
in the real world. This led us to create a strong business plan
that can be found in
Business Plan.
Following our educational event in Pressana (for more information
visit Society engagement- Roundtable with Citizens)
we were invited to talk about PFAS pollution in Veneto and to propose surPFAS solution
in Cologna Veneta, another town in the most polluted area in the region.
The event was organized with the aim of giving young people a space to
present their research in the field of PFAS pollution control and to
inform the citizens affected by this issue about the attempts of the
scientific community in trying to develop a solution.
This occasion was well accepted by the population, enthusiastic about
the surPFAS project as they saw it as a concrete answer to the problem.
In January, we were contacted by Giacomo Grisafi, Digital Marketing
Specialist for Promega Italy, who asked us to participate in an episode
of Promega’s ‘’Let’s Talk Science’’, a podcast hosted by Giuseppe Mancuso
where researchers have the opportunity to describe their work and field
of research to a wide audience.
We took this opportunity to talk about what iGEM is, describing both
P.A.S.T.A. (the project of the 2023 iGEM team of our university),
and the first stages of SurPFAS.
In addition to that, we explained the problem of water contamination
caused by PFAS, hoping to spread information about this extremely worrying topic.
We also discussed the future of synthetic biology at our university.
This science branch is attracting more and more interest in Padua
thanks to the recent creation of the Synthetic Biology center, that
has the goal of creating new synergies between different departments.
Through MammeNoPFAS ( we had the possibility to attend, as part of the audience, one day of a 2-day PFAS conference organized by ‘Osservatorio PFAS’, run by FOSAN (a Research Organization for the Study of Food and Nutrition), on the risk assessment in the agribusiness supply chain from primary production to packaging. During the event we had the honor of hearing from experts on the epidemiological aspects of PFAS, focusing on their toxicity and related environmental pollution. We also covered in depth what are the clinical manifestations associated with these molecules (endocrine disruption, maternal-fetal alterations, male and female fertility, metabolic alterations, and related cancers). On of the speaker was a colleague of Prof. Cristina Canova, from the University of Padova, who presented her work, which we found extremely interesting, leading us to contact her from the roundtable with the citizens organized by us (for more information on her and the event visit Collaboration & Partnership - Expert in Epidemiology and Society Engagement - Roundtable with Citizens).
Our Instagram account is our primary outreach platform,
exploiting the fast and direct communication through social
media for scientific dissemination. By posting content in
both Italian and English, we aim to engage and educate a
wider audience. We regularly share "science pills" that
break down complex aspects of PFAS contamination into
simple and accessible language. We cover topics like
the history of PFAS, the chemical nature of these substances,
and highlight special insight on our work; by doing so, and
also by sharing some information about ourselves, we want to
engage the population in our project.
In addition to Instagram, our website serves as a more
comprehensive platform where we expand on the information
shared on social media. Here, visitors can find detailed
articles and interviews with PFAS experts, providing an
in-depth understanding of the issue.
Our collaboration with influencer Rossana Dian (@cucinosano) has been instrumental in promoting our Instagram account, allowing us to reach a broader audience, particularly in our local area. This partnership has generated significant positive feedback on our project through direct messages.
Aware of the local impact of our project, we involved from the beginning citizens into our project, to promote and exchange of ideas. Local newspapers were amazed by this enthusiasm and further helped us promoting SurPFAS. In the articles PadovaOggi and Il Gazzettino wrote, we had the opportunity to share our GoFundMe campaign: the financial support received was crucial for permitting us to participate to iGEM and also made us aware of the impact we were having on local communities.
During the past few months we had the opportunity to collaborate
with FREDsense Technologies, a canadian company that offers analytical
services and it’s currently developing portable field kits for PFAS detection.
This start-up was founded after a participation in iGEM 2013.
They have given us a few tips on what to focus on for competition and technical support.
In fact, they provided us with information on their sensor, which is under
development, and analytical tests on a sample of water from our territories.
For more information on this visit
Collaboration & Partnership
- Canadian Start-Up for PFAS Sensors
The iGEM 2023 team from the University of Padova has given us substantial support from the beginning. They were the spark that led to the creation of the 2023 Team, the first italian group to participate in iGEM since 2017. They also were the one that inspire the individual components of our current team and make us aware of the experience offered by the iGEM Community. They also have given us precious advice and suggestions on how to set up the project, the website and the events with the public. Last September they involved us in managing their stand in the Science4All event (for more information about that look Society Engagement - Science4All: Science Festival), allowing us to have our first experience with the public.
In May we applied for the iGEM Mentorship Programme, created with
the goal of bringing new teams and alumni together, and enabling
everyone to meet their targets for iGEM 2024.
We were matched, by the iGEM Community with Kavya Prathap Kumar.
She has been a source of advice from the beginning and her
passion and her strong desire to help us left us speechless.
We are really grateful for her involvement in our project.
She has given us feedback on our short video and on how to
present the general idea of surPFAS, she helped us keep up
with iGEM deadlines and make sure to have everything ready for when needed.
This summer we took part in the European Mini-Jamboree organized
by the Toulouse iGEM team. We were invited to spend two days in
Toulouse, where the students of the home team had planned several
activities for us, allowing us to get in touch with students from
10 other Igem teams, exchange ideas and warm up before the Grand Jamboree.
It was an exceptional opportunity to further improve our project.
Each invited team exhibited a poster and presented their project
in 15 minutes live talk in front of students, professors and iGEM judges.
The feedback we received was incredibly valuable, helping us
understand our work's strengths and weaknesses and giving us
important guidance on how to best prepare the exposition to the public.
In particular, we were suggested to consider the implementation
of our system also within an industrial context, in addition to
groundwater, as a PFAS-purification method in wastewater. This
made us reflect upon the future prospects of our project, and
the possibility of expanding our system to new applications.
With this in mind, we decided to also conduct growth test on
Escherichia coli in a wastewater matrix, check out the results
in our
Model page.
In addition to this, we had a great exchange of knowledge and
ideas with the other groups not only during the official
presentations but throughout our entire stay, which led
to improvement in our working approaches and provided us
with new ideas to continue our iGEM experience in the best
possible way.
We thank the Toulouse iGEM team for their efforts and
generosity in organizing this wonderful event, and all the
participants for being part of such a memorable experience.
On the 22nd of September we attended an online symposium, organized by the Michigan iGEM team, where eleven iGEM teams, working on projects focused on bioremediation, were present. During this Mini Jamboree it was possible to share our projects with each other, our perspectives on the different issues and give each other feedback before the Jamboree in Paris. The experience as a whole was very comforting, as we shared the various difficulties we encountered during this year and listened to the solutions and helpful advice offered. It was very interesting to see what each team's selling point was and how they were able to present it in such a masterful way, it was also a wonderful thing to know that people out there are as invested in the environment’s health as we are.
After more than 10 years, two different Italian iGEM teams participate during the same year at the competition: when finding this out, we immediately thought it could be extremely enriching meeting up and discussing our shared experience, coming from a similar background. When we met in person at the Mini Jamboree in Toulouse, the Pisa-IT team was very enthusiastic at the idea of getting together again in Italy, and so we reconnected a few weeks later via texts and we started to organize a new meet-up. During this meet-up, which will take place at Padua the 11th of October, we plan to present our iGEM project during a mock-up presentation and judging session, where a few iGEM judges will be present thanks to the help of our secondary PI. Next, a brief Q&A with the members of the iGEM 2023 team will take place, where we will talk about their experience at the Jamboree: it will be the perfect opportunity for both our teams to prepare ourselves as best we can for the final presentation in Paris. After the hard work is done, we will have lunch together and visit the city of Padua in the afternoon, including a tour into the famous Orto Botanico of Padua, since the project of the Pisa-IT team revolves around plants health and we’re sure they will appreciate the tour very much.
On July 20th and 21st, a member of our team participated in the
iGEM Startups Summer School, a congress organized by iGEM to
prepare and guide students in drafting the wiki to be competitive
for the Best Entrepreneurship Prize. During these sessions, the
evaluation criteria were presented, along with the key elements
that need to be included in the wiki.
The presentations helped us understand the areas to focus
on and the concepts to outline in order to become a startup,
both from a research and development perspective as well as an economic one.
We truly appreciated this initiative by iGEM, which guided and motivated
us to further explore the practical application aspect. This way, our
project will not just remain in the realm of research but will have
real-world applications, helping the community.
A few professors from different STEM faculties gave us the opportunity
to use part of their lesson to inform students about iGEM and give a
brief introduction on what synthetic biology is.
We also used these meetings to make our team known and encourage STEM
students to be part of the 2025 Team.
We talked with students enrolled in Medicine, Biology (specifically
with the one from molecular biology and biotechnology), Biomedical
Engineering, Software engineering and Chemistry.
After this we organize a meeting for those who were interested
or curious on what we do. On this occasion we talked in more
detail about what a participation in the iGEM competition entails.
We encountered a high level of participation from those present,
who asked many questions on the topic.
We then held a round of interviews with the ones that expressed
their willingness to participate in the future 2025 team.
Of the 40 young people who applied we had to, reluctantly, only choose 15.
To end the recruitment process on a fun note we organized a
happy hour with the Mutans team 2023, 2024 and 2025 of the
University of Padua, thus launching the future team with
the value of cohesion between past and future teams.
It was May 2023, when Laura, our team member, received a letter which
convened her for a control of PFAS concentration in her blood as part
of an epidemiological programme for those from the so called ‘Red Zone’
(a highly PFAS polluted area in our region Veneto); this was the second
screening control for PFAS levels in people living in her hometown, one
of the most affected worldwide by this contamination. She found out her
PFAS levels were several times higher than the maximum level stipulated.
Deeply touched by this fact and this problem that had been going on for so
many years, she began to inquire about the current treatment of the problem.
Conversing with other colleagues from different university faculties, such
as Physics and Engineering, she found that the remediation methods in place
were reductive and did not lead to a real degradation of the compounds.
This notion was stuck in her mind for months, so when the time of
deciding the topic of research for our team came she had an idea.
She decided to look up ‘PFAS bacteria’ on NCBI, and from there she
discovered a world: a world of research and attempts at biodegradation.
She knew what our team had to focus on: PFAS.
We set out to find experts who could help us look into the matter.
We got a lot of feedback, as the issue is very much related to our
area, even in our University.
Prof. Bergantino's help was particularly interesting since she had
already worked on the study of a bacterial species used as a biocatalytic
system for PFAS degradation.
We also contacted local companies, such as AcqueVenete, a water service
provider in our region (for more information visit
Collaboration & Partnership
- Veneto’s Drinking Water Provider), to better understand the technologies
used for the treatment of these pollutants.
From all of this we realized that the current situation presentes many
problematic points so we decided to attack the PFAS problem from several
fronts (from the filtering systems to PFAS degradation, also implementing
a way to analyze the efficiency of the entire system).
We also understood that PFAS contamination had long been ignored and
underestimated, even by part of the public, despite the lively activism
of some citizens.
We therefore decided to embark on a very big project, perhaps bigger than
ourselves, with the intention of publicizing and raising awareness of
the problem too.
Consequently an integral part of our project has been the continuous
contact and confrontation with experts and citizens, such as
MammeNoPFAS (for more information visit
Collaboration & Partnership
- Activists’ Group Raising PFAS Awareness) and the locals from the
Red Zone (for more information visit
Society Engagement).
Through the meetings held with companies and citizens we also got a
360-degree view of the problem and an idea of what the needs and
fears of these communities are. This aspect was enormously
important to us as one of the core values of our team is to
develop a project with always the population affected in mind.
For example these encounters confirmed our idea of focusing on
2 types of PFAS (PFOA and PFOS), but they made us grasp the
importance of also considering PFBA. In addition these meetings
led us to modify the matrix of study. We had started out by
considering industrial wastewater, but these meetings helped
us realize that priority should be given to groundwater, while
keeping industrial water as the next area of research.
An important part of the project is the identification of the specific PFAS molecules of interest and the matrix on which we want to focus on.
We started by focusing on PFOA and PFOS: the types of PFAS most
studied, toxic and present in the environment.
Thanks to the meeting with Acquevenete (for more information visit
Collaboration & Partnership
- Veneto’s Drinking Water Provider) we understood the importance of
considering PFBA too. This molecule is crucial for a real application
of surPFAS as it’s currently use as a warning sign of the saturation
of the filters: when water service providers detect PFBA in the water
exiting the filters they know that GAC (the adsorbent currently used
in PFAS filters, for more information about it visit
Plant Design - Filters
) has reached its PFAS sorption capacity and it must be
removed and replaced with clean GAC or the treatment system will
not remain effective.
After receiving this information we decided to add PFBA to the
list of molecules investigated in all the modules of the project,
starting with the Escherichia coli growth test.
In May we had the honor to talk with Dr. Philippe Grandjean,
one of the world's leading experts on the adverse health effects
that are linked to the PFAS exposure.
He endorsed our decision to undertake research into a chemical-biological
methodology for the treatment of PFAS, being this the most promising way.
He also explained to us how the PFAS problem is becoming more and more
‘insistent’, given the creation of new molecules (Gen X) whose environmental
and health impact has not been studied in detail prior to their use
and dissemination.
Nevertheless he supported our choice of focusing on PFOA and PFOS,
‘the old generation ones’, ‘because they are better characterized,
already in the environment, bigger and more difficult to degrade’.
This meeting was also useful for us because it allowed us to get a
broad picture of the human health issues due to PFOA and PFOS exposure.
In the same month, we also participated in a conference organized
by the FOSAN association on the effects of PFAS exposure
(for more information visit
Society engagement
), providing an even deeper understanding of the impact of
these pollutants on human health.
Moreover, thanks to the analysis carried out by FREDsense
Technologies on groundwater samples collected at an Acquevenete plant
in the so-called ‘Red Zone’, we were able to confirm the high presence
of this PFAS in our region.
This feedback led all modules in our project to consider PFOA, PFOS and PFBA, starting with the analysis of the survival of our reference organism (Escherichia coli) in the presence of these pollutants (for more information visit Experiments - growth test ).
Our initial idea was to focus on the study of industrial wastewater,
being them a source of PFAS pollution and diffusion.
A meeting with Acquevenete (a water service provider), however,
led us to turn our attention to groundwater. In fact, this company
explained to us that the only ways they were able to deal with the
PFAS crisis in the Veneto region were to use absorbent filters for
these pollutants and to replace the groundwater used for the water
supply, so that it would be ‘clean’. However, it is currently impossible
to recover contaminated groundwater because there are no methods for
degrading PFAS and thus cleaning up these sites. Moreover, these sites
contain higher and ‘constant’ concentrations of these pollutants over
time than those found in river water.
However, as emerged from the opinions of the participants of the Mini
Jamboree held in Toulouse (for more information visit
iGEM Community
)
and the meeting with the residents of the Red Zone in Pressana (for more
information visit
Society engagement
), it is also important to
keep in mind the need to find a solution to industrial wastewater.
Specifically, through a questionnaire submitted to the latter,
we found that people who participated in the survey believe that
PFAS removal is most urgent on water matrices: of these, priority
is given to industrial wastewater (40.6%) and groundwater (31.1%);
household water treatment is perceived as less of a priority.
However, several people supported the need to work on all
matrices at the same time.
Thus, the respondents believe that PFAS removal should start with
the cleaning of aqueous matrices, such as groundwater; after that,
the study should move on to wastewater from industrial plants and
finally move on to soils receiving such water and the air surrounding
industrial plants.
This information therefore allowed us to confirm our choice of matrix
and identify future research steps.
Furthermore, from a meeting held with MammeNoPFAS, we identified another
possible future study matrix: animal products.
Our team agrees that the next study matrix should be industrial wastewater.
For this reason, we performed some tests on the growth of Escherichia
coli in a matrix similar to such wastewater.
Part of our project focuses on developing a detection method for PFAS
in water matrix that can give results easily, rapidly and in loco, as
opposed to the ones based on sampling and laboratory analysis.
We started by searching which PFAS sensors could be found on the
market and came across FREDsense Technologies, a start-up company
currently developing portable field kits for PFAS detection. We
contacted them and arranged a meeting with their CEO.
From this meeting we realized that there is still a long way to go
until a sensor capable of detecting PFAS accurately and even at low
concentrations is developed so we decided we wanted to do our part in
finding an alternative.
For this reason we decided to conceive a sensor based on RAMAN-SERS
technique (for more information visit
Plant Design - Sensors
).
We started by focusing on PFOA, then move on to PFOS and PFBA once we
saw the results obtained from the collaboration with FREDsense Technologies
and Acquevenete (FREDsense Technologies carried out analysis on groundwater
samples collected at an Acquevenete plant in the so-called ‘Red Zone’ in our
region) where the high presence of these molecules is evident.
During the first stages of project design we also took into account the
possibility of creating a sensor capable of measuring PFAS level in the
blood but we quickly realized it would be difficult to work with this
type of matrix.
The first step in our project concerns a way to collect PFAS from an aqueous
matrix to be then degraded.
We started by looking into the current methods used to do this and came
across granular activated carbon filters (GAC), currently used by water
service providers such as Acquevenete, as explained to us during our
first meeting with them.
After a meetup with Prof. Ester Marotta, we started to consider ion
exchange resins as an alternative adsorbent to GAC.
Then there was the problem of how to detach the pollutants from the
filters. During our meeting with Acquevenete, we were told filters
are currently reactivated through thermal processes in which the
saturated adsorbent is exposed to high temperatures in order to
‘destroy’ PFAS molecules; in the scientific literature it is
possible to find multiple studies stating that this type of treatment
needs to be investigated further because it appears that it could lead
to the emission of volatile and mobile products and harmful compounds. [1]
This notion led us to research other possible procedures to regenerate
saturated filters; we came to the decision to study the chemical desorption
of PFAS filters, through the use of specific solutions. This choice was
endorsed by Prof. Philippe Grandjean during the online call we had with
him and MammeNoPFAS.
Thanks to the collaboration with Acquevenete, in addition to the various
information received on their filtration system and the adsorbent used,
we were able to obtain groundwater and GAC samples: the former were sent
to FREDsense to be analyzed, the latter were used for desorption experiments.
The desorption solutions we tested were chosen after a literature review
and a meeting with Prof. Ester Marotta, in particular for GAC we used
organic solutions with methanol or ethanol and MilliQ water. We then
scaled up the volumes used in the lab to full-size systems, such as
the one used by Acquevenete, and found it would not be economically
feasible, but in doing so we didn’t realize on thing: a filtration
system would not use MilliQ but tap water, which would significantly
reduce costs. This was pointed out to us by our iGEM Mentor Kavya Prathap Kumar.
In the early design stages of filter regeneration, we thought about
functionalizing the adsorbent surface, but then there would be a biosafety
problem due to the possible detachment of microorganisms from the surface.
Having identified a biocatalytic system as the best prospect for
PFAS degradation, we began with an in-depth literature review to investigate
currently employed methods. We were fortunate to find an article by Prof. Bergantino,
in which she studied a possible degradative approach to PFAS; we immediately sought
contact and support from the professor, who showed immediate willingness to engage
in discussion. In selecting our project, we first conducted a state-of-the-art
review on PFAS biodegradation. Our research aimed to find microorganisms proposed
to have biodegradative activity on PFAS; using these as a starting point, we
identified possible ways to implement them in the project: optimizing the organism
itself for more efficient degradation or selecting specific degradative enzymes,
using them either in a cell-free system or expressing them in a model organism.
The choice most suitable for us was the expression in Escherichia coli of enzymes
identified for PFAS degradation in microorganisms that the literature identifies
as the best performers. However, the Achilles' heel of microbial PFAS biodegradation
lies in their incomplete elimination: it can produce shorter-chain compounds that are
still polyfluorinated and therefore persistent in the environment. Faced with this
apparent partial degradation action, Prof. Bergantino advised us to consider promoting
a synergistic action between enzymes; she herself had conducted a biocatalysis study
on PFAS, suggesting that two enzymes, particularly laccases and dehalogenases, could
have complementary action on PFAS. We therefore thought of implementing different
microorganisms in the same system, co-culturing them in a bioreactor, trying to
"attack PFAS with all the ammunition at our disposal". However, selecting organisms
for the consortium and establishing ideal co-culture conditions represented too lengthy
a task given our limited time: we decided to focus only on laccases and dehalogenases,
betting on their complementary mechanism of action.
Another issue we considered concerned the permeability of intermediate products
from the catalytic actions of laccases and dehalogenases on PFAS. Previously,
these had not been precisely defined, let alone their membrane permeability.
Among possible solutions, we considered co-expressing the two enzymes in the
same microorganism, or conducting a study on possible transporters that could
facilitate the passage of reaction intermediates in and out of the cell. In a
further meeting with Prof. Bergantino, she expressed concern about excessive
metabolic load for the first alternative, while identifying the second as too
lengthy a task. Instead, she proposed using a surface expression approach,
particularly engineering two different strains of Escherichia coli to express
either laccase or dehalogenase, anchored on their surface.
Once we opted for this strategy, we began researching display systems that
had previously shown the best results under conditions similar to ours. While
we were setting up our design, Prof. Bergantino finally advised us to use an
inducible expression system, given the metabolic load we would subject the
enzyme host to. We therefore decided to implement the pTac promoter in the
expression cassettes we designed, which is inducible with IPTG.
The PFAS problem is very complex but we believe that our
contribution can be ‘a shining beacon that lights the path
to a solution’, as our project was described by a citizen
present at our roundtable with the population.
We do know that there is a long way ahead of us but
also know what needs to be done. Future investigations
should focus on: