While the final evaluations rest with the iGEM judges, we believe that self-assessing our project fosters deeper reflections and insights into our accomplishments and areas for improvement. This page consolidates pertinent information regarding prize evaluations.
Our self-assessment indicates that we meet the bronze medal criteria based on our previous work and submissions.
Deliverables
In addition to bronze, we demonstrate fulfillment of the silver medal criteria through our engineering successes and human practice initiatives.
We are confident that our project showcases excellence in synthetic biology, as evidenced by the following three aspects that align with the gold medal criteria:
During our project’s development, we actively participated in various human practice activities to refine its trajectory. After exploring potential directions, we collaborated with community members for insights into the challenges and consulted experts to enhance our design. We also gathered critical data through surveys and educational initiatives. Overall, our efforts facilitated meaningful connections with individuals, organizations, and specialists, leading to our success. Further details can be found on our HP page.
Our team successfully introduced 21 novel composite parts to the iGEM Registry, each designed to fulfill specific functions. These parts comply with iGEM requirements and the Registry's submission guidelines. Once integrated, they will serve as valuable resources for future iGEM teams undertaking similar projects. More information about these new composite parts is available on our parts page.
We redesigned BBa_K2116002 to create a more effective part, now documented as BBa_K5374021. Our experiments, using the original part as a control, showed clear performance improvements. All details, including experimental data and comparisons, are documented on the Main Page and Part's Page in the Registry, providing valuable insights for future projects.