Contribution
Introduction
Throughout this year's competition we worked on providing future iGEM teams with tools for many different applications. Since we worked with three different organisms (Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Komagataeibacter xylinus) we developed standardized protocols to collect comparable and valuable data. For this we also built a machine to directly perform mechanical property tests without specialized gear. Furthermore we designed genetic constructs for K.xylinus to enable future teams an easier handling of non-model organisms for related applications. Conveniently, we designed parts that interact with cellulose that is also naturally produced by K.xylinus. Furthermore, we fixed a preexisting part (the OYC-eforRed-dropout, eforRed selection cassette for level 1 vector ; BBa_J435281) from the part registry that had the wrong cloning sites and therefore was not usable for the declared purpose of the part. For achieving the suitable color by mixing of different chromoproteins, we developed a software, which predicts the color accurately for a modular coloring system. Lastly, we constructed a xyloglucan specific binding domain.
Contributions we made:
Fixing the OYC Backbone (BBa_J435281):
When we received our distribution kit, we were planning to use the part BBa_J435281, which is a Open Yeast Collection backbone. Sadly we found that the overhangs after Bsa1 digest are not compatible with regular MoClo Level 1 assembly. Therefore we reported the error and progressed by fixing the part part in silico and then in vitro. After repeated sequencing confirmed the problem, we fixed it with running two consecutive Golden Gate reactions, in which the part was fixed at two locations. To achieve this we used primers with overlapping overhangs, different from the original sequence, in the later desired sequences for level one assembly. We now registerd this fixed part as BBa_K5146045
Property testing machine
Another contribution for future teams is the creation of a simplified, low budget property testing machine (Picture 1). With this, iGEM teams who lack the necessary funding or contacts can do their own mechanical testing on textiles, including tear tests and tensile strength tests.
Picture 1: Property testing machine mark 2 (“DAS MASCHIN”) in tear test configuration (left) and tensile strength configuration (right).For precise replication of our work, we created a step-by-step building instruction for the machine. Additionally to the assembling of the machine, we provide a self-established protocol to allow teams the use of our tear test [crosslink to simplified tear test protocol].
Lastly, as it is crucial for a functioning property testing machine, we wrote some code for the machine to be used in tear tests.