Notebook

This is the notebook page of iGEM HUST-China 2024. Here you can find our daily work and progress.

Molecular Experiment

July 14th - July 15th

July 16th - July 17th

July 18th - July 19th

July 20th - July 21st

July 22nd - July 23rd

The results of PCR identification for PETase-MHETase-aldA-fucO
Fig 1. The PCR identification result of plasmid PETase-MHETase-aldA-fucO
The results of PCR identification for PETase-MHETase-aldA-fucO

July 24th - July 25th

July 26th - July 27th

The results of PCR identification for tphA2A3BA1-pBBR1-CS2
Fig 2. The PCR identification result of plasmid tphA2A3BA1-pBBR1-CS2
The results of PCR identification for tphA2A3BA1-pBBR1-CS2

July 28th - July 29th

July 30th - July 31st

The results of PCR identification for tpaK-pBBR1-CS2
Fig 3. The PCR identification result of plasmid tpaK-pBBR1-CS2
The results of PCR identification for tpaK-pBBR1-CS2

August 1st - August 2nd

August 3rd - August 4th

We suspect that due to the wrong designing of our plasmid, the tpaK gene fragment contained the restriction enzyme sites that would cut the gene fragment tpak into two pieces while we’re performing double enzyme digestion on plasmid tpak-pBBR1CS-2, resulting in an excess of wrong fragments with identical cohesive ends, which would ultimately causes most ligation products to be incorrect.

August 5th

August 6th - August 7th

August 8th - August 9th

The results of PCR identification for pTerephthalate
Fig 4. The PCR identification result of pTerephthalate
The results of PCR identification for pTerephthalate

August 10th - August 11th

August 12th - August 13th

We believe that the similar lengths of the rhlA-rhlB fragment and the pUC57 fragment make it difficult to clearly separate bands during electrophoresis, preventing precise purification of the rhlA-rhlB gene fragment.

August 14th

August 15th - August 16th

August 17th

August 18th - August 19th

The results of PCR identification for rhlA-rhlB-pVLT33
Fig 5. The PCR identification result of rhlA-rhlB-pVLT33
The results of PCR identification for rhlA-rhlB-pVLT33

August 20th - August 21st

August 22nd - August 23rd

August 24th - August 25th

We failed to link these fragments. We suspect that the low activity and amplification efficiency of the pVLT33 (vector) plasmid resulted in low ligation efficiency between pVLT33 and phaZ. We decide to proceed the expression validation for other plasmids first, and continue to construct plasmid phaZ-pVLT33 if our experiment schedule is relatively free.

September 2nd - September 3rd

The results of PCR identification for phaZ-pVLT33
Fig 6. The PCR identification result of phaZ-pVLT33
The results of PCR identification for phaZ-pVLT33

Expression Validation

Validation of the degradation efficiency of terephthalic acid.

August 28th - August 29th

August 30th - August 31st

September 1st - September 7th

September 8th

Ramnolipid Detection

August 28th - August 29th

August 30th - August 31st

September 1st - September 5th

Prepare the plate for TCL of rhamnolipid.

September 6th

PET Degradation Efficiency Validation

September 9th - September 10th

September 11th - September 12th

September 13th - September 14th

September 15th

September 16th - September 17th

September 18th

September 19th - September 26th

Validation of the Utilization Efficiency of Ethylene Glycol

September 13th - September 19th